Skip to content

Are Starbucks' New Energy Drinks Healthy?

4 min read

Despite being marketed as 'healthier,' a 12-ounce can of Starbucks' new zero-sugar Iced Energy contains 160mg of plant-based caffeine. So, are Starbucks' new energy drinks healthy, or do they carry potential hidden drawbacks for daily consumption?

Quick Summary

A detailed analysis of the health and nutritional aspects of Starbucks' latest energy drink offerings, examining high caffeine levels, artificial sweeteners, and potential health impacts.

Key Points

  • Caffeine Content: Starbucks' Iced Energy drinks contain 160mg of caffeine per 12oz can, a significant dose that can cause side effects like anxiety and heart palpitations in sensitive individuals.

  • Zero Sugar, Artificial Sweeteners: While low in calories, the Iced Energy line uses artificial sweeteners like sucralose and acesulfame potassium, which have potential links to gut health issues and metabolic disturbances.

  • Not for Children and Teens: Health experts and organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics advise against energy drink consumption for minors due to health risks associated with high caffeine levels.

  • Source Doesn't Negate Risk: The 'plant-based' caffeine from green coffee bean extract still has the same stimulant effects on the body as other sources, and the high dose is the primary concern.

  • Better Hydration Alternatives: Plain water, green tea, or black coffee are often healthier, more natural options for a daily boost, especially when compared to the higher caffeine and additive content of energy drinks.

  • Occasional Treat, Not Daily Supplement: These drinks should be viewed as an occasional indulgence, not a regular or healthy beverage, especially for frequent consumers or individuals with pre-existing conditions like anxiety or heart problems.

  • Not All are Zero-Sugar: Older energy drinks like the Doubleshot Energy line still contain high levels of sugar and calories, presenting a different set of health considerations.

In This Article

Decoding Starbucks' New Energy Drink Lineup

Starbucks, a global leader in coffee culture, has recently expanded its ready-to-drink (RTD) lineup to include the new Iced Energy series and has long featured other options like Doubleshot and Baya energy drinks. As consumers become more health-conscious, the big question remains: are Starbucks' new energy drinks healthy? The answer requires a deep dive into the ingredients, comparing them against established nutritional guidelines, and understanding the potential side effects of their key components.

Caffeine: A Powerful Stimulant with a Catch

Caffeine is the primary active ingredient in all of Starbucks' energy drinks, delivering the promised 'boost'. However, the levels are substantial, and the effects are not without potential downsides. For the Iced Energy drinks, the 160mg per 12oz can is a significant dose, comparable to a standard-sized cold brew, but can cause side effects for individuals sensitive to stimulants. Even higher amounts (up to 205mg) are found in some in-store handcrafted versions. The FDA recommends a daily limit of 400mg for most healthy adults, and one of these drinks consumes a large portion of that allowance. Excessive caffeine intake can lead to a host of problems, including anxiety, jitteriness, insomnia, rapid heart rate, and digestive issues. For children and adolescents, who are major consumers of the Starbucks brand, health experts and the American Academy of Pediatrics advise against energy drink consumption due to these risks.

The Controversial Role of Artificial Sweeteners

To achieve their signature sweet flavors without the calories or sugar, Starbucks' new Iced Energy and other zero-sugar options rely on artificial sweeteners like sucralose and acesulfame potassium. While regulatory bodies like the FDA consider them safe for consumption within recommended limits, a growing body of research raises concerns about their long-term health effects. Studies suggest potential links between high intake of artificial sweeteners and a disrupted gut microbiome, increased risk of metabolic disorders, and even cardiovascular issues. These non-nutritive sweeteners may not solve underlying issues related to sugar cravings and can condition taste buds to prefer high-intensity sweetness.

Deconstructing the 'Natural' Energy Claim

Starbucks often highlights its 'plant-based' or 'natural' energy sources, such as green coffee bean extract or the coffee fruit. While this sounds healthier than synthetic additives, it's essential to remember that caffeine is caffeine, regardless of its source. The body processes it largely the same way, and the side effects are not mitigated by its 'natural' origin. A more balanced perspective acknowledges that the source is less important than the total quantity and frequency of consumption. The perception of 'natural' can sometimes mask the high stimulant content and encourage people to consume more than they should.

Ingredients: Beyond Caffeine and Sweeteners

Beyond the core ingredients, Starbucks' energy drink formulas include various other components. The Iced Energy series contains B vitamins (B3, B5, B6), panax ginseng extract, and preservatives. The Doubleshot Energy line includes additional ingredients like guarana, taurine, and high sugar content in non-zero-sugar variants. While B vitamins are essential, the high levels in these drinks far exceed what most people need and offer no proven additional benefits for a healthy diet. The effects and safety of other additives like taurine and guarana, especially when combined with high caffeine, have been subject to concern, particularly for younger consumers.

How Starbucks' Energy Drinks Stack Up

Here is a comparative look at some of Starbucks' energy-boosting options:

Feature Iced Energy (Zero Sugar) Doubleshot Energy (Vanilla) Baya Energy (Raspberry Lime)
Calories (per can) 5 210 90
Sugar (per can) 0g 25g 22g
Caffeine (per can) 160mg (12oz) 135mg (15oz) 160mg (12oz)
Key Additives Green coffee bean extract, B vitamins, ginseng, sucralose Brewed coffee, milk, sugar, taurine, ginseng, guarana, sucralose Coffee fruit extract, B vitamins, Vitamin C
Sweetener Artificial (Sucralose) Sugar & Artificial (Sucralose) Sugar

Navigating Your Choices

For those seeking an energy boost, understanding the nutritional information of each product is key. The low-calorie and zero-sugar options like the new Iced Energy are an improvement over older, high-sugar versions, but the presence of high caffeine and artificial sweeteners necessitates caution. Regular, high consumption is not without risk, and alternatives like plain black coffee or tea, with their simpler ingredient profiles and lower caffeine levels per serving, may be a better option for a daily pick-me-up. For hydration, nothing beats plain water. The healthiness of these drinks is entirely dependent on context—how much, how often, and for whom. For most people, they are an occasional indulgence, not a daily health supplement. Visit the FDA's site for general caffeine guidelines.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the question of whether Starbucks' new energy drinks are healthy is nuanced. While the zero-sugar Iced Energy line represents a step toward a 'healthier' profile with its low calories and lack of sugar, it is not a health food. The high concentration of caffeine and the inclusion of artificial sweeteners introduce potential risks, especially for frequent consumers or sensitive individuals. These drinks should be viewed as occasional treats rather than a reliable, healthy source of daily energy. Informed choices based on personal health, tolerance to stimulants, and understanding of artificial sweetener concerns are crucial.

Potential Health Concerns with Frequent Energy Drink Consumption

  • Caffeine Overload: The high caffeine content in some Starbucks energy drinks can cause anxiety, jitters, and a rapid heartbeat, especially in caffeine-sensitive individuals.
  • Sleep Disruption: Consuming these energy drinks, particularly later in the day, can interfere with sleep patterns and quality, leading to insomnia.
  • Artificial Sweetener Effects: Sweeteners like sucralose may impact gut health, potentially altering the microbiome and contributing to metabolic issues over time.
  • Cardiovascular Risks: Some research has associated higher consumption of artificial sweeteners, like acesulfame potassium and sucralose, with increased cardiovascular disease risk.
  • Risk for Adolescents: Health organizations discourage energy drink consumption in children and teens due to high caffeine levels that can affect their developing bodies and trigger side effects.

Frequently Asked Questions

A standard 12-ounce can of the new Starbucks Iced Energy drinks contains 160mg of plant-based caffeine. Some in-store handcrafted versions, like the Tropical Citrus, can contain even higher levels, up to 205mg in a Venti size.

The new Iced Energy drinks contain zero sugar and only 5 calories per can, but older products like the Doubleshot Energy line can contain significant amounts of sugar, up to 25g per can.

Starbucks' zero-sugar Iced Energy drinks use artificial sweeteners such as sucralose and acesulfame potassium (Ace-K) to achieve their sweet taste without adding calories.

Potential health risks include side effects from high caffeine intake like anxiety, insomnia, and increased heart rate. The artificial sweeteners also carry potential risks related to gut health and metabolic function, especially with regular high consumption.

While the caffeine comes from natural sources like green coffee bean extract, the body's reaction to high doses of caffeine is largely the same regardless of its origin. The stimulant effects and potential side effects are not eliminated by the source.

The American Academy of Pediatrics advises against energy drink consumption for children and adolescents due to high caffeine levels and potential health risks. High doses can be dangerous for their developing bodies.

The Iced Energy drinks are lower in calories and contain zero sugar compared to the Doubleshot Energy line, which can have over 200 calories and significant sugar content. The Iced Energy also relies on artificial sweeteners, while the Doubleshot uses a mix of sugar and artificial sweeteners.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.