Skip to content

Can Humans Taste Starch? The Discovery of a Sixth Basic Taste

4 min read

For centuries, the human tongue was believed to perceive only five basic tastes: sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and umami. But a 2016 study published in the journal Chemical Senses uncovered evidence that humans can, in fact, taste starch, suggesting the existence of a sixth fundamental taste sensation. This discovery challenges long-held assumptions about carbohydrate perception and adds a new layer to our understanding of human food intake.

Quick Summary

This article explores the evidence behind the discovery that humans can taste starch, distinct from sweetness. It details the role of oral enzymes like salivary alpha-amylase and taste receptors, and discusses the evolutionary significance of sensing complex carbohydrates.

Key Points

  • Sixth Taste: Emerging research indicates that humans possess a sixth basic taste for 'starchy' foods, distinct from the five traditional tastes.

  • T1R-Independent Mechanism: The starch taste is detected through a pathway separate from the sweet-taste receptor (T1R2/T1R3), suggesting a unique sensory mechanism.

  • Salivary Amylase Role: The enzyme salivary alpha-amylase (sAA) breaks down starches into shorter sugar chains, which contributes to, but does not solely cause, the perception of starch.

  • Metabolic Sensors: Taste cells contain metabolic sensor pathways, involving glucose transporters, that detect the breakdown products of starch, providing a direct mechanism for sensing complex carbohydrates.

  • Evolutionary Advantage: The ability to taste starch provided an evolutionary advantage by helping our ancestors identify calorie-dense foods, a trait reinforced by the expansion of the amylase gene in agricultural societies.

  • Health Implications: Understanding the starch taste can influence food science, potentially aiding in the development of new products and providing insights into why some people may be more sensitive to high-carb foods.

In This Article

A Scientific Shift: From Tasteless Carbohydrates to the 'Starchy' Taste

For most of modern history, starch, a complex carbohydrate, was considered tasteless to humans. The subtle sweetness detected when chewing foods like bread or potatoes for an extended period was attributed to the enzyme salivary alpha-amylase (sAA) breaking down starches into simpler, sweet-tasting sugars like maltose and glucose. However, groundbreaking research from Oregon State University's food science department began to challenge this assumption. Led by Professor Juyun Lim, a team conducted a series of blind taste tests that revealed a more complex sensory reality.

The Research That Broke New Ground

The 2016 study involved experiments where participants were given solutions containing simple and complex carbohydrates. To isolate the potential 'starchy' taste from sweetness, some solutions were treated with a sweet-taste inhibitor called lactisole. Strikingly, even with their sweet receptors blocked, subjects could still detect a distinct flavor from the complex carbohydrate solutions. They described this new, separate sensation as 'starchy,' 'flour-like,' or 'rice-like'. The findings provided the first direct demonstration that humans can perceive the taste of glucose oligomers, the short-chain polymers that result from starch breakdown.

The Mechanism Behind the Starch Taste

The perception of starch is a two-part process involving both enzymatic breakdown and direct receptor activation. It's not a single mechanism but a combination of several physiological events working in concert within the oral cavity.

The Role of Salivary Alpha-Amylase (sAA)

As previously understood, sAA is secreted by our salivary glands and begins the process of hydrolyzing starch into maltooligosaccharides (MOS) and maltose. This action happens rapidly upon mastication and explains the gradual sweetening of starchy foods as they are chewed. Individuals with higher levels of sAA activity are more sensitive to this starch-related sweet taste.

The New Discovery: A T1R-Independent Pathway

The crucial insight from Lim's research is that a component of starch taste persists even when the sweet-taste receptor, a G-protein-coupled receptor known as T1R2/T1R3, is blocked. This implies the existence of a distinct, T1R-independent pathway for sensing complex carbohydrates. Further studies have identified that taste cells themselves express a range of carbohydrate-cleaving enzymes, such as maltase-glucoamylase (MGAM), that break down maltooligosaccharides into transportable monosaccharides. These monosaccharides are then detected by a metabolic sensor pathway within the taste cells involving glucose transporters (GLUTs) and the sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1). This system essentially allows the taste cells to directly 'taste' or sense the breakdown products of starch, independent of the classical sweet receptor.

Evolutionary Advantage: The Drive to Eat Carbs

From an evolutionary perspective, the ability to taste and detect complex carbohydrates would have been highly advantageous for our ancestors.

  • Energy Detection: Starch is a crucial source of slow-release energy, and being able to sense its presence would have helped early humans identify and prioritize calorie-dense foods.
  • Dietary Adaptation: Studies of the amylase gene (AMY1) show that humans with ancestors from starch-rich agricultural societies tend to have more copies of the gene, leading to higher levels of salivary amylase. This suggests a powerful selective pressure favoring efficient starch digestion during the advent of agriculture.

Comparison: Sensing Simple Sugars vs. Complex Starches

Feature Simple Sugars (e.g., Glucose) Complex Starches (e.g., Maltodextrin)
Primary Receptors Primarily the T1R2/T1R3 G-protein-coupled receptor, signaling sweet taste. Involves a T1R-independent pathway utilizing glucose transporters and metabolic sensors within the taste cells.
Sensation Perceived as a straightforward, hedonically pleasing sweet taste. Perceived as a distinct 'starchy' or 'floury' flavor, which can eventually become sweet as salivary enzymes break it down.
Mechanism Simple sugars are small enough to directly bind to the sweet taste receptors on the surface of taste buds. Large starch polymers are too big to bind directly. They must be broken down by enzymes like sAA and MGAM before their products can be sensed by metabolic pathways.
Evolutionary Role Signals immediate, high-energy source. The instant gratification of sweetness drives consumption. Signals a valuable, slow-release energy source. The ability to sense it allows for the recognition of a calorie-dense food.

Implications for Food Science and Health

The recognition that humans can taste starch has profound implications. For food scientists, this opens up new possibilities for understanding and manipulating flavor profiles, particularly in low-sugar or starch-based products. For nutrition and public health, it helps explain why certain people might be more drawn to starchy foods. Understanding the mechanisms behind this sensation could lead to new ways of controlling food intake and managing conditions like obesity, which is often linked to the overconsumption of high-carbohydrate foods. The sensation of 'starchy' taste may act as a signal that influences our eating behavior, beyond just the promise of sweetness.

Conclusion

The answer to whether humans can taste starch is no longer a simple 'no.' Decades of research have culminated in a nuanced understanding that reveals a complex, two-pronged system for sensing carbohydrates. While our salivary enzymes do convert starches into sweet-tasting sugars, a separate, evolutionary-driven mechanism also exists that allows us to detect the presence of complex carbohydrates independently. This groundbreaking finding expands our understanding of taste, food perception, and the deep evolutionary ties between our diet and our biology. As research continues, the 'starchy' taste may soon take its official place alongside the classic five, redefining the science of flavor for good. For more on the physiological roles of salivary enzymes in digestion and metabolism, see this review: Salivary Amylase: Digestion and Metabolic Syndrome.

Frequently Asked Questions

Tasting starch involves a separate sensory pathway that detects the small glucose polymer chains produced from starch breakdown, giving a sensation described as 'floury' or 'starchy'. Tasting sweetness, on the other hand, is mediated by dedicated sweet receptors that bind to simple sugars.

Scientists used a sweet-taste inhibitor (lactisole) in experiments. Even with the ability to taste sweetness blocked, participants could still perceive a distinct starchy flavor from complex carbohydrate solutions, proving it is a separate sensation.

Salivary amylase breaks down complex starches into smaller glucose oligomers and sugars. This initial breakdown makes the starch easier to sense, and prolonged chewing increases the concentration of these shorter chains, eventually leading to a sweet taste sensation.

While the scientific evidence is compelling, it is not yet officially recognized as a basic taste. A taste must meet several criteria to be officially added to the list, but the discovery has generated significant excitement in the food science community.

Evidence suggests that the ability to taste and efficiently digest starch has evolved over time. Ancestors in agricultural societies, where starch-rich diets were common, developed more copies of the salivary amylase gene, enhancing this capability.

Yes, it is possible. Research suggests that some people are more sensitive to the taste of carbohydrates and tend to consume more of them. This sensitivity might act as a subconscious accelerator for carbohydrate intake, impacting health outcomes.

This discovery could revolutionize food science and nutrition by helping researchers understand food cravings and energy intake. It also opens avenues for exploring how taste perception influences metabolic health and obesity.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.