Skip to content

Does Chocolate Milk Have More Sugar Than Coke?

3 min read

According to the Cleveland Clinic, ounce for ounce, chocolate milk can be equal in sugar content to soda drinks. This surprising fact challenges the common perception that milk-based beverages are always the healthier choice. So, does chocolate milk have more sugar than Coke, or is it a more complicated comparison?

Quick Summary

A detailed comparison of chocolate milk and Coke's sugar content reveals which beverage truly packs more sweet punch. The analysis covers serving sizes, added sugars, and overall nutritional profiles to determine the real difference between these popular drinks.

Key Points

  • Coke has more sugar by serving, but chocolate milk can be dense. A 12oz can of Coke has more sugar than an 8oz glass of chocolate milk, but ounce-for-ounce, some chocolate milk can be comparable.

  • Sugar types matter for nutrition. Chocolate milk contains both natural lactose and added sugars, whereas Coke is sweetened with only added sugars, which contribute 'empty calories'.

  • Chocolate milk offers valuable nutrients. Unlike Coke, chocolate milk provides essential nutrients like protein, calcium, and Vitamin D, making it a more complete beverage despite its sugar content.

  • Moderation is key for both. Both beverages should be consumed in moderation due to their sugar content; excessive intake of added sugar is linked to various health risks.

  • Consider the context of consumption. For athletic recovery, chocolate milk's mix of protein and carbohydrates can be beneficial, a purpose for which Coke offers no advantage.

  • Healthy alternatives are available. Alternatives include water, unsweetened milk, or homemade chocolate milk with controlled sugar levels.

In This Article

The Surprising Reality of Sugar Content

Many people assume that because chocolate milk contains milk, it is inherently healthier than a can of soda like Coke. While it does offer beneficial nutrients like calcium and protein, the addition of chocolate flavoring often comes with a significant amount of added sugar. A standard 8-ounce serving of chocolate milk can contain around 24 grams of sugar, with about half of that being added sugar, depending on the brand. In comparison, a standard 12-ounce can of Coke contains around 39 grams of sugar. On a gram-per-ounce basis, this makes the comparison quite close, and in some commercial formulations or smaller portions, chocolate milk can even surprise with its high sugar density.

Comparing Sugar Types: Added vs. Natural

One of the key distinctions between the sugars in chocolate milk and Coke is their source. Plain milk naturally contains lactose, a milk sugar. Chocolate milk adds sweeteners like sugar or corn syrup to this, which are considered 'added sugars'. Coke, on the other hand, is sweetened almost entirely with added sugars. This is a crucial point for understanding the health implications, as your body processes these sugars differently. While the body can use both for energy, natural sugars in milk come packaged with essential nutrients, whereas the added sugars in soda are often referred to as 'empty calories'.

The Full Nutritional Picture

Beyond just the sugar count, a true nutritional comparison must look at the overall package. Here is a comparison of key nutritional components based on standard servings (8oz for milk, 12oz for Coke):

Feature Chocolate Milk (8 oz) Coca-Cola (12 oz)
Sugar ~24g (varies by brand) ~39g
Protein ~8-9g 0g
Calcium ~30% Daily Value 0% Daily Value
Vitamin D ~15% Daily Value 0% Daily Value
Potassium Present Minimal
Empty Calories Fewer (due to nutrient content) High

This table highlights that while Coke might have a higher absolute sugar content per typical serving, chocolate milk offers substantial nutritional benefits that Coke completely lacks.

Health Implications of Excessive Sugar Intake

Regardless of the source, high sugar consumption, especially added sugars, poses several health risks. Excessive intake is linked to increased risk of chronic conditions such as type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and obesity. The sugar in sugary beverages can also contribute to weight gain by providing calories that are less satisfying than those from solid foods, potentially leading to overconsumption.

The Verdict and Choosing Wisely

While the absolute sugar content in a larger serving of Coke is higher, a smaller serving of chocolate milk can have a surprisingly high sugar density. The key takeaway, however, is that chocolate milk is a nutritionally richer beverage. It contains important nutrients like protein, calcium, and vitamin D, making it a better choice for hydration and post-workout recovery compared to an empty-calorie drink like Coke. The decision on which beverage to consume should not be based solely on sugar content but rather on the overall nutritional value and context. For children and adults, moderation is key for both.

Making Smarter Beverage Choices

  • Prioritize Water: Your primary source of hydration should always be water.
  • Read Labels: Don't assume. Check the nutrition facts for total sugar and, if available, added sugar content.
  • Go Unsweetened: For a healthier alternative, try regular, unflavored milk.
  • Portion Control: If you choose a sweetened drink, stick to smaller, controlled portions.
  • Homemade Options: Mix your own chocolate milk with unsweetened cocoa powder and a measured amount of a low-glycemic sweetener to control the sugar content.
  • Post-Workout Context: The carbohydrates in chocolate milk can be useful for replenishing energy stores after strenuous exercise, a benefit Coke cannot provide.

Conclusion

In the direct comparison of sugar per standard serving, Coke typically contains more sugar than chocolate milk. However, the initial question of whether does chocolate milk have more sugar than coke is misleading if only focused on the headline number. Chocolate milk contains both natural and added sugars but offers significant nutritional benefits like protein and calcium that Coke completely lacks. The real health concern for both beverages lies in excessive consumption of added sugars. Ultimately, while chocolate milk is a more nutritious option, both should be consumed in moderation as part of a balanced diet, with water being the preferred daily hydration source.

USA Today: Is chocolate milk good for you? Here's the complicated answer.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, chocolate milk is generally a healthier choice than Coke because it offers essential nutrients like protein, calcium, and Vitamin D that Coke completely lacks. However, its high sugar content still means it should be consumed in moderation.

A standard 12-ounce can of Coke contains about 39 grams of sugar. An 8-ounce glass of chocolate milk typically contains around 24 grams of sugar, with half being natural lactose and half being added sugar.

High intake of added sugars from drinks is associated with health risks such as weight gain, obesity, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and dental cavities.

Yes, the type of sugar matters. While both contain sugars, chocolate milk's natural lactose is paired with nutrients. Coke's added sugars are 'empty calories,' providing energy without nutritional benefit.

Yes, some athletes use chocolate milk as a post-workout drink. Its carbohydrate-to-protein ratio helps replenish energy stores and repair muscles, making it more effective than many sports drinks for recovery.

Yes, many brands offer low-fat, low-sugar, or no-sugar-added chocolate milk versions. Checking the nutrition facts label is the best way to find a healthier option.

While chocolate milk provides nutrients beneficial for growing children, both it and soda should be limited due to high sugar content. Water and plain milk are healthier daily options, with sweetened drinks reserved for occasional treats.

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.