For those committed to a careful nutrition diet, every component of consumption matters, including the water you drink. Premium bottled water brands, particularly Evian and Fiji, market themselves on purity and unique mineral profiles. But are the differences significant enough to sway your choice? A closer look at their sources, mineral content, and other factors reveals how these two popular waters stack up.
Sources and Origins: A Tale of Two Terroirs
Evian's story begins in the French Alps, where its journey starts as rain and snow. Over a 15-year period, this water filters through layers of glacial sand and rock, which naturally enrich it with minerals. Protected by layers of clay, this underground source remains untouched by man until bottling. This long, natural filtration process is the foundation of Evian's balanced mineral composition.
Fiji water, by contrast, comes from a natural artesian aquifer located in the remote Yaqara Valley on Fiji's main island. The water is sealed within the aquifer by layers of impermeable volcanic rock, which protects it from external elements. This unique volcanic rock filtration infuses Fiji water with its signature minerals, particularly silica, and gives it a soft, smooth mouthfeel. Both brands emphasize their pristine, protected sources as a key selling point.
Mineral Composition and Nutritional Benefits
The most significant difference between Evian and Fiji lies in their mineral content. These naturally occurring minerals act as electrolytes, which are critical for hydration, nerve, and muscle function.
-
Evian's Mineral Profile (per liter):
- Calcium (Ca²⁺): ~80 mg
- Magnesium (Mg²⁺): ~26 mg
- Potassium (K⁺): ~1 mg
- Bicarbonates (HCO₃⁻): ~360 mg
- Sodium (Na⁺): ~6.5 mg
-
Fiji's Mineral Profile (per liter):
- Silica (SiO₂): ~93 mg
- Bicarbonate: ~152 mg
- Calcium (Ca): ~18 mg
- Magnesium (Mg): ~15 mg
- Sodium (Na): ~17 mg
- Potassium (K): ~5 mg
Key Nutritional Differences
Evian provides higher levels of calcium and magnesium, which are beneficial for bone health and muscle function, respectively. Fiji, on the other hand, is uniquely high in silica, a mineral purported to benefit skin, hair, and nails. Both contain electrolytes essential for the body's proper functioning.
Taste and Subjective Preferences
Taste in bottled water is a highly subjective experience, shaped largely by the mineral profile. In a 2017 blind taste test by Business Insider, both Fiji and Evian ranked low, with filtered tap water outranking both. However, online forums and personal anecdotes paint a more nuanced picture of subjective preferences.
- Evian Taste: Often described as smoother and having a balanced taste due to its calcium and magnesium content. Some tasters describe it as feeling 'soft'.
- Fiji Taste: Characterized by its soft, silky mouthfeel, which is attributed to its high silica content. It can have a slightly sweet taste, which some find more palatable than Evian.
Environmental and Ethical Considerations
For many consumers, the environmental impact of purchasing bottled water is a major concern. Both Evian and Fiji have faced scrutiny due to their use of plastic bottles and the energy required for global transport.
- Evian: The brand is actively working to mitigate its environmental footprint. Evian aims to become a fully circular brand by making all plastic bottles from 100% recycled plastic (rPET). They also highlight their sustainability actions, including water conservation at the source and using renewable energy at bottling sites. However, the long journey from the French Alps to global markets still entails significant transport emissions.
- Fiji: The product must travel across the ocean from the remote Fiji Islands, creating a substantial carbon footprint. Fiji has established a foundation to support sustainability initiatives in the region and has committed to using 100% recycled PET bottles. Despite these efforts, the high energy required for international shipping is an unavoidable part of their business model.
Comparison Table
| Feature | Evian | Fiji Water |
|---|---|---|
| Source | French Alps | Artesian aquifer in the Fiji Islands |
| Mineral Profile | High in Calcium and Magnesium | High in Silica, plus Calcium and Magnesium |
| Taste | Balanced and smooth | Soft, silky mouthfeel, slightly sweet |
| pH Level | Neutral (approx. 7.2) | Alkaline (approx. 7.7) |
| Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) | Higher (approx. 345 ppm) | Lower (approx. 222 ppm) |
| Sustainability | Initiatives for recycled plastic, renewable energy, and carbon neutrality | Transported long distances, but supports Fiji Foundation and aims for 100% rPET |
| Cost | Considered premium, can be more expensive | Also premium, price varies, sometimes slightly less than Evian |
Which Water Should You Choose?
The answer to "is evian or Fiji water better?" depends on your personal priorities. If you are looking for higher levels of calcium and magnesium, Evian might be the better nutritional choice. If you prefer a smoother taste and the added benefit of silica for skin health, Fiji could be your pick. For the environmentally-conscious, both brands have significant transport footprints but are taking steps toward sustainability; Evian's use of renewable energy at bottling sites may give it a slight edge.
Ultimately, neither is a nutritional powerhouse capable of replacing a balanced diet, and the trace minerals they provide can often be sourced elsewhere. Your choice should come down to taste preference, mineral content, and your stance on the environmental trade-offs. The purest and most sustainable option remains filtered tap water for most people, but for those seeking a specific taste or mineral profile, the choice between Evian and Fiji is more than just branding.
Conclusion
While both Evian and Fiji are high-quality, premium bottled waters, they offer different experiences rooted in their distinct geographical origins. Evian, from the French Alps, provides a balanced mineral profile with a crisp taste, while Fiji, from its Fijian artesian aquifer, is known for its high silica content and smooth mouthfeel. The final decision rests on individual taste, nutritional preferences for specific minerals, and a consideration of their respective environmental impacts. For most people, the difference is primarily a matter of preference rather than a significant nutritional advantage.
For more information on the brands' efforts, Fiji water provides details on its sustainability and water quality reports.
