Skip to content

How Chobani Less Sugar Compares to Other Brands

5 min read

According to a 2018 study published in BMJ Open, flavored yogurts contain substantially more sugar than natural Greek varieties. For those seeking a healthier, lower-sugar option, Chobani Less Sugar has become a popular choice. But how does Chobani Less Sugar compare to other brands on the market, and is it truly the best option for your diet?

Quick Summary

This article offers an in-depth comparison of Chobani Less Sugar Greek yogurt against other popular brands like Siggi's, Fage, and Oikos. We analyze the nutritional content, including sugar and protein levels, and discuss the differences in taste and texture to help you find the best fit for your needs.

Key Points

  • Natural Sweetness vs. Alternatives: Chobani Less Sugar uses cane sugar and fruit for sweetness, while brands like Oikos Triple Zero and Two Good utilize stevia.

  • Sugar Levels Vary: Chobani Less Sugar contains about 5g of added sugar, while Oikos Triple Zero has none and Two Good has 0-2g.

  • Protein Content is Competitive: Chobani Less Sugar offers 12g of protein, on par with Two Good, but slightly less than Oikos Triple Zero and some Siggi's varieties.

  • Texture Depends on Preference: Chobani Less Sugar has a creamy, but not overly thick texture, while Icelandic-style Siggi's and Fage are notably denser.

  • Taste Differs with Sweeteners: The use of stevia in brands like Oikos and Two Good creates a distinct flavor profile that not all consumers enjoy, unlike Chobani's naturally sweeter taste.

  • Consider Ingredients: If avoiding artificial sweeteners is a priority, Chobani Less Sugar, Fage, and Siggi's are preferable over Oikos and Two Good.

In This Article

Understanding the Less Sugar Yogurt Category

Before diving into the comparisons, it's important to understand the landscape of low-sugar yogurt. There are several ways brands achieve a lower sugar count. Some, like Chobani Less Sugar, reduce the amount of cane sugar and rely on natural fruit purées for sweetness, while others use artificial or alternative natural sweeteners, such as stevia or monk fruit extract. The best choice depends on individual preferences for taste, ingredients, and nutritional goals.

The Nutritional Profile of Chobani Less Sugar

Chobani Less Sugar is a low-fat Greek yogurt that serves as a benchmark for many consumers. For a standard 5.3-ounce cup, it contains approximately 9 grams of total sugar, with about 5 grams of that being added sugar from sources like cane sugar. This is significantly less than Chobani's regular flavored yogurts, which can have 15-18 grams of total sugar. It also provides a solid 12 grams of protein per serving, making it a satiating snack option. Crucially, it does not use artificial sweeteners.

Head-to-Head: Chobani Less Sugar vs. Competitors

To make a well-rounded decision, let's examine how Chobani Less Sugar fares against some of its biggest competitors in the low-sugar and high-protein yogurt space.

Chobani Less Sugar vs. Siggi's

Siggi's is an Icelandic-style yogurt, known as skyr, which is thicker and tangier than traditional Greek yogurt. Siggi's plain varieties are very low in sugar, with no added sugar, while their flavored options like vanilla contain about 5 grams of added sugar per 5.3 oz serving, similar to Chobani Less Sugar. However, Siggi's often has a higher protein content and a much thicker texture due to its straining process.

Chobani Less Sugar vs. Oikos

Oikos offers several low-sugar options, most notably their Triple Zero line. Oikos Triple Zero is sweetened with stevia leaf extract and has 0 grams of sugar and 0 grams of artificial sweeteners, while packing 15 grams of protein per 5.3-ounce cup. Chobani Less Sugar, conversely, uses real cane sugar in smaller amounts. For those avoiding all added or artificial sweeteners, Oikos Triple Zero is a compelling alternative, though the taste profile is distinctly different due to the stevia.

Chobani Less Sugar vs. Fage

Fage is a well-regarded Greek yogurt brand, particularly for its thick, creamy, and tangy texture. Fage Total 0% Blended Greek Yogurt offers a low-fat, low-sugar option, with 6-7 grams of added sugar per serving and a thick, creamy consistency that many prefer. Fage uses more real fruit pieces compared to Chobani's purée, offering a different textural experience. For those who prefer a less sweet, more traditional Greek yogurt, Fage can be a great alternative.

Chobani Less Sugar vs. Two Good

Two Good is another popular low-sugar option, known for its very low sugar count. At just 2 grams of sugar per 5.3-ounce cup, it's one of the lowest available and is sweetened with stevia. Two Good also has a respectable 12 grams of protein per cup, making it a strong competitor for those focused on minimal sugar intake. However, some consumers might find the stevia aftertaste and tangy flavor to be more pronounced than in Chobani Less Sugar.

Comparison Table: Chobani Less Sugar vs. Key Brands

Feature Chobani Less Sugar (5.3 oz) Siggi's Flavored (5.3 oz) Oikos Triple Zero (5.3 oz) Two Good (5.3 oz)
Total Sugar 9g ~11g 0g 2g
Added Sugar 5g 5g 0g 0g (natural)
Sweetener Cane sugar, fruit Cane sugar, fruit Stevia, Monk fruit Stevia
Protein 12g 13-17g 15g 12g
Calories 120 ~120 90 80
Texture Smooth, creamy Very thick, dense Smooth, creamy Smooth, less dense
Flavor Subtly sweet, fruity Tangy, rich, clean Sweet (stevia), distinct Tangy, slightly bitter (stevia)

Pros and Cons Analysis

Chobani Less Sugar

  • Pros: Uses only natural ingredients for sweetness, providing a balanced flavor without artificial aftertastes. It's creamy and offers a good protein boost.
  • Cons: Not the lowest sugar option available, and some may find the texture slightly less thick than Icelandic or other Greek varieties.

Siggi's

  • Pros: Extremely thick and satisfying texture. High in protein. The plain option is a truly low-sugar base for custom additions.
  • Cons: The distinct tanginess isn't for everyone. Flavored versions contain similar added sugar to Chobani Less Sugar.

Oikos Triple Zero

  • Pros: Zero added sugar and high protein content make it ideal for those closely managing sugar intake.
  • Cons: Sweetened with stevia, which can have an aftertaste some people dislike.

Two Good

  • Pros: One of the lowest sugar counts on the market, very low in calories.
  • Cons: Like Oikos, the stevia sweetener may not appeal to all palates. Can be more tangy than Chobani Less Sugar.

Making the Best Choice for Your Health Goals

When deciding between Chobani Less Sugar and its competitors, your final choice will depend on several factors:

  • Flavor Profile: If you prefer a naturally sweetened, fruit-forward taste without alternative sweeteners, Chobani Less Sugar is a great choice. If you prefer a more pronounced tang, Siggi's or Fage are better bets.
  • Sugar Sensitivity: For those who need to eliminate all added and artificial sugars, Oikos Triple Zero is the clear winner. Two Good is also an excellent option with its extremely low sugar count.
  • Texture: If a thick, rich texture is a top priority, Icelandic yogurts like Siggi's or traditional Greek yogurts like Fage will likely be more satisfying than Chobani Less Sugar.
  • Ingredient Preferences: If avoiding artificial sweeteners is a must, stick with Chobani Less Sugar, Siggi's (flavored), or Fage. Oikos and Two Good use stevia.

Ultimately, there is no single "best" less sugar yogurt, but rather one that best aligns with your personal health needs and taste preferences.

Conclusion

Chobani Less Sugar is a strong contender in the low-sugar yogurt market, offering a balanced, naturally sweetened option with a creamy texture and good protein content. It compares favorably to competitors like Siggi's, Fage, Oikos, and Two Good, especially for those who prefer to avoid artificial sweeteners. However, other brands excel in specific areas—Oikos and Two Good for zero/minimal sugar, Siggi's and Fage for thick, tangy texture. By considering the factors of sweetener type, texture, and flavor, consumers can confidently select the yogurt that best fits their dietary goals and palate.

Sources

  1. Yogurt in Nutrition: Yogurts vary widely in sugar content, survey shows
  2. Cozymeal: 17 Best Low-Calorie Yogurt Brands To Try in 2025
  3. Wellness for Womanhood: Product Review: Chobani Less Sugar Greek Yogurt
  4. Eat Smart, Move More, Prevent Diabetes: Best Low-Sugar Greek Yogurt
  5. Chobani Website: Less Sugar* Product Page

Note: Information for Siggi's, Oikos, and Two Good is drawn from a combination of the search results. Always check the most current product nutrition labels for the latest information.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, Chobani Less Sugar is generally healthier than regular flavored yogurts. It contains significantly less added sugar, relying more on natural fruit purées for flavor, and provides a good source of protein without using artificial sweeteners.

No, Chobani Less Sugar does not contain artificial sweeteners. It is sweetened with a smaller amount of cane sugar and natural fruit, making it a good option for those who want to avoid sweeteners like stevia or sucralose.

Chobani Less Sugar offers a solid 12 grams of protein per 5.3 oz serving. This is comparable to Too Good, but slightly lower than high-protein rivals like Oikos Triple Zero (15g) and some Siggi's varieties (13-17g).

Chobani Less Sugar has a creamy, smooth texture, but it is typically less thick and dense than Icelandic-style yogurts like Siggi's or Greek yogurts like Fage.

Yes, its creamy texture and mild sweetness make Chobani Less Sugar a versatile ingredient for smoothies, parfaits, and as a base for sauces or dips.

The main difference is the sweetener. Chobani Less Sugar uses a small amount of cane sugar, while Oikos Triple Zero uses stevia leaf extract and monk fruit to achieve zero added sugar, resulting in a different flavor profile.

A consumer might choose Chobani Less Sugar over Siggi's if they prefer a smoother, creamier texture and a flavor that is less tangy and more fruit-forward. The taste of Siggi's, due to its Icelandic style, is tangier and thicker.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.