Skip to content

How Many Calories Are in a Double Lolly?

3 min read

According to Swizzels, a single Double Lolly contains around 36 to 45 calories, depending on the exact size and batch. This article will reveal the full nutritional profile and answer the question: how many calories are in a double lolly?

Quick Summary

A standard Swizzels Double Lolly contains 36 to 45 calories, primarily from sugar, with negligible amounts of fat or protein. This iconic compressed powder sweet is suitable for vegans and those avoiding gluten.

Key Points

  • Calorie Count: A single Swizzels Double Lolly has approximately 36 to 45 calories, depending on the lolly's specific size.

  • Sugar-Based Energy: The vast majority of the calories in a double lolly come from carbohydrates, specifically sugar and dextrose.

  • Low Nutrient Density: The sweet contains negligible amounts of fat and protein, offering little to no nutritional value beyond simple energy.

  • Suitable for Vegans and Coeliacs: Swizzels Double Lollies are gluten-free and suitable for vegans and vegetarians.

  • Moderation is Key: As a high-sugar item, the double lolly is best enjoyed as an occasional treat within a balanced diet.

In This Article

A Clear Breakdown of Double Lolly Calories

For many, the Double Lolly is a nostalgic throwback to childhood, with its two-toned fruit flavours. But with growing awareness of diet and nutrition, many people wonder about the calorie content of their favourite treats. The calorie count can vary slightly depending on the specific lolly and portion size, but most sources point to a standard range for the popular Swizzels brand.

The Tesco website lists the nutritional information for Swizzels Originals Double Lollies, stating that one 10g serving (one lolly) contains 45kcal. Similarly, the Fitia app, citing nutritional data, reports that one 8.5g serving of Double Lollies contains 36 kcal. This small variation is likely due to minor differences in lolly size or batch production. As a general rule, you can expect one lolly to be in the ballpark of 40 calories.

What are the main ingredients?

Understanding the ingredients helps explain the calorie source. Swizzels provides a list of ingredients for their Double Lollies, which largely consists of sugar and other carbohydrate-based components. The main ingredients are:

  • Sugar
  • Dextrose
  • Anti-Caking Agents (Stearic Acid, Magnesium Stearate, Magnesium Carbonate)
  • Modified Starch
  • Acidity Regulator (Malic Acid)
  • Cornflour
  • Flavourings
  • Colours (Anthocyanin, Copper Chlorophyllin, Curcumin, Lutein, Paprika Extract)

The high sugar and dextrose content explains why the calories are almost exclusively from carbohydrates. The tiny amounts of fat or protein present are negligible, making the double lolly a simple energy source from sugar alone.

Comparison: Double Lolly vs. Other Treats

How does the Double Lolly compare to some other popular confectionery items? Comparing the calorie and sugar content can provide context for those monitoring their intake. Below is a comparison table using data found online. It's important to note that serving sizes can differ, so the 'Per 100g' value offers a standardised comparison.

Item Serving Size Calories (Per Serving) Sugar (Per 100g) Primary Source
Swizzels Double Lolly 8.5g - 10g 36 - 45 kcal 91g Swizzels
Swizzels Double Dip 19g pack ~71 kcal 91.6g Sweeteeze
Smarties Double Lolly Approx. 7g 30 kcal High (primarily dextrose) CalorieKing

From the table, we can see that a Double Lolly is a relatively low-calorie choice compared to a Double Dip, primarily because the serving size is much smaller. However, all three are high in sugar, which is a key consideration for anyone managing their intake. While a Double Lolly has fewer calories than some larger sweets, it should still be viewed as an occasional treat.

Is a Double Lolly a 'Healthy' Snack?

Given its high sugar content and lack of other nutrients like protein, fibre, or vitamins, a Double Lolly is not considered a healthy snack. It offers 'empty calories'—calories that provide energy but little to no nutritional value. However, treats have a place in a balanced diet when consumed in moderation. For many, the enjoyment of a nostalgic sweet is a valid part of a balanced lifestyle, not something to be eliminated entirely.

For those with specific dietary needs, it's worth noting that Swizzels Double Lollies are considered vegan-friendly and suitable for coeliacs as they are gluten-free, according to the manufacturer. They are also free from artificial colours. Always check the packaging, as product formulations can change over time. For the most up-to-date information, it's best to consult the manufacturer's website directly.

Conclusion: The Sweet Takeaway

In summary, a standard Swizzels Double Lolly contains approximately 36 to 45 calories, almost all of which come from its high sugar content. While it is a relatively low-calorie treat compared to other larger sweets, it offers very little nutritional benefit. For those enjoying a Double Lolly, it's best to savour it as an occasional, nostalgic indulgence rather than a regular snack. Its vegan and gluten-free status makes it suitable for many with specific dietary requirements, but for everyone, moderation is key when it comes to enjoying this sugary classic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, Swizzels Double Lollies are suitable for vegans, as they contain no animal-derived ingredients.

A typical Swizzels Double Lolly (10g) is very high in sugar, with around 91g of sugar per 100g. This means a single lolly contains around 9 grams of pure sugar.

Yes, according to the manufacturer, Swizzels Double Lollies are gluten-free, making them suitable for coeliacs.

A standard Swizzels Double Lolly has significantly fewer calories (36-45 kcal) than a Double Dip (around 71 kcal), primarily because a single lolly is a much smaller serving size.

The main ingredients are sugar, dextrose, and various anti-caking agents, flavourings, and colours.

No, Swizzels Double Lollies are free from artificial colours.

Yes, but Swizzels states they are not suitable for children under 36 months due to their hardness and shape.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.