Visual Basic Standards: Guidelines, Not Commandments
When asking "How many standards are in a VB?", it's important to understand that you're not asking for a number but for a collection of conventions. Unlike a specification with a fixed number of rules, coding standards are dynamic and can be adapted by teams to fit their specific needs. However, a core set of principles, many of which are promoted by Microsoft, form the basis of most effective VB standards. Adopting these standards offers numerous benefits, including reduced maintenance costs, fewer bugs, and smoother collaboration.
Naming Conventions
Effective naming is arguably one of the most visible and important aspects of any coding standard. It allows for quick recognition of an element's purpose and type.
- PascalCase: Recommended for function, method, class, structure, and module names. Example:
CalculateTotal,EmployeeName. - camelCase: Used for local variables and parameters. Example:
maxElement,currentFile. - UPPER_CASE: Reserved for named constants. Words are separated by underscores. Example:
BUFFER_SIZE,MEMORY_ERROR. - Prefixes (Hungarian Notation): Used in classic Visual Basic for indicating data type (
sfor string,ifor integer) and scope (gfor global,mfor module-level). While less critical in modern VB.NET due to improved tooling, it remains a common standard, especially in legacy projects.
Formatting and Layout Conventions
Proper formatting makes code easier to read and follow. Consistent indentation and use of whitespace are critical for improving code clarity.
- Indentation: Use a consistent indentation, such as four spaces, for nested blocks of code. This helps visualize the program's logical structure.
- One Statement Per Line: Avoid using the colon (
:) to combine multiple statements on a single line. This improves readability and is a widely accepted practice. - Line Continuations: Use implicit line continuation where possible and the underscore (
_) sparingly for readability. Manual indentation of continuation lines is also a best practice. - Blank Lines: Use blank lines to separate logical sections of code, such as between procedure definitions or variable declarations.
Commenting and Documentation
Comments are crucial for explaining the why behind the code, rather than simply restating the what. A robust standard includes rules for both block and inline comments.
- Procedure Headers: A brief comment block at the start of each procedure should describe its function, parameters, and return values.
- Inline Comments: Use inline comments sparingly to explain complex or non-obvious implementation details.
- Separate Lines: For clarity, comments should generally be placed on a separate line rather than at the end of a line of code.
- Start with Uppercase: Start comment text with an uppercase letter and end with a period.
Program Structure and Language Usage
Beyond style, standards dictate best practices for language features to improve robustness and efficiency.
- Explicit Variable Declaration: Always use
Option Explicitat the top of every module to enforce explicit variable declaration. This prevents bugs from typos and avoids the use of slowVariantdata types. - Variable Scope: Declare variables with the smallest possible scope (
Privateor local) to minimize potential side effects and improve modularity. Global variables should be used with extreme caution. - Data Types: Avoid the
Variantdata type and use specific, appropriate data types (Integer,String, etc.) to optimize performance and memory usage. - Error Handling: Utilize structured exception handling with
Try...Catch...Finallyblocks in modern VB.NET instead of the outdatedOn Error GoTo.
VB 6.0 vs. VB.NET Standards Comparison Table
There are some key differences in standards and best practices between classic Visual Basic (VB 6.0) and the modern, object-oriented VB.NET.
| Feature | Classic VB 6.0 | Modern VB.NET | Reasoning for Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Naming Conventions | Heavy reliance on Hungarian notation prefixes for type and scope (txt for textbox, g for global). |
Focus on more descriptive, self-documenting names using PascalCase and camelCase. | Better IDEs provide type information, reducing the need for prefixes. Emphasis on readability over conciseness. |
| Error Handling | Primarily relies on unstructured On Error GoTo statements, which can lead to "spaghetti code". |
Supports robust, structured Try...Catch...Finally blocks for more reliable exception handling. |
Structured exception handling is safer and more readable, preventing code flow issues associated with GoTo statements. |
| Data Types | Frequent use of the versatile but inefficient Variant data type. Integer is 16-bit. |
Discourages Variant in favor of specific types. Integer is 32-bit, Long is 64-bit. |
Strong typing at compile time ensures greater performance and correctness. Allows developers to catch type-mismatch errors earlier. |
| Procedural vs. OOP | Primarily procedural with some object capabilities. Code is often placed in forms and modules. | Fully object-oriented, with a focus on creating reusable classes and separating business logic from the user interface. | Embracing OOP principles leads to more maintainable, scalable, and reusable code, especially in large applications. |
Conclusion: The Goal of Visual Basic Standards
There is no final, definitive answer to "how many standards are in a VB?" because the term refers to a comprehensive set of programming best practices. The goal is not to count rules but to internalize a philosophy of writing clean, clear, and efficient code. By adopting consistent conventions for naming, formatting, commenting, and leveraging modern language features, developers can significantly improve the quality of their Visual Basic applications. Adhering to these principles transforms coding from a solitary task into a collaborative effort, ensuring that projects remain manageable and robust throughout their lifecycle.
Additional Resources
For more detailed information, consult the Microsoft Learn documentation on Visual Basic coding conventions. You can also find numerous articles and guides, such as those from eident.co.uk and James Madison University, which offer historical and practical perspectives on VB standards.