Standardized Criteria for Adults: GLIM
The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria provide a consensus-based approach for diagnosing and grading malnutrition severity in adults. The diagnosis requires at least one phenotypic criterion and one etiologic criterion. Phenotypic criteria include unintentional weight loss, low body mass index (BMI), and reduced muscle mass. Etiologic criteria include reduced food intake or assimilation and disease burden (inflammation). The severity of malnutrition is then graded as moderate or severe based on the degree of phenotypic deficit.
The GLIM Diagnostic Framework
- Phenotypic Criteria: These measure the physical and compositional changes in the body.
- Unintentional Weight Loss: A loss of 5–10% over six months (or 10–20% over a longer period) indicates moderate malnutrition, while a loss greater than 10% in six months (or greater than 20% in a longer period) indicates severe malnutrition.
- Low BMI: For individuals under 70, a BMI under 20 kg/m² indicates moderate malnutrition, and under 18.5 kg/m² indicates severe. For those aged 70 or older, the cutoffs are <22 kg/m² and <20 kg/m², respectively.
- Reduced Muscle Mass: Assessed through physical examination or body composition measurement techniques like DEXA. A mild to moderate deficit is considered moderate malnutrition, while a severe deficit indicates severe malnutrition.
 
- Etiologic Criteria: These determine the underlying cause of nutritional imbalance.
- Reduced Food Intake or Assimilation: This includes consuming ≤50% of the estimated energy requirement for more than one week, or having chronic gastrointestinal conditions that impair nutrient absorption.
- Inflammation: Indicated by an acute disease, injury, or a chronic disease with associated inflammation.
 
Using Screening Tools like MUST and MNA
Before a full GLIM assessment, patients can be screened using tools like the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) or the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA).
- MUST: A five-step tool used to identify adults at risk of malnutrition. It scores patients based on BMI, recent unintentional weight loss, and the effect of acute disease.
- MNA-Short Form: Specifically for older adults (65+), this tool uses a short questionnaire to evaluate factors like food intake, weight loss, mobility, and stress to identify risk.
Specialized Assessment for Children
Diagnosing malnutrition in children requires different criteria that account for their rapid growth and development. Anthropometric measurements are key, typically using World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards to calculate Z-scores.
Indicators for Pediatric Malnutrition Severity
- Wasting (Low weight-for-height): This indicates acute malnutrition, often due to recent illness or insufficient food. Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is defined as a weight-for-height Z-score (WHZ) of less than -3 standard deviations, or a mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) less than 115mm.
- Stunting (Low height-for-age): This is the result of chronic or recurrent undernutrition. It holds children back from reaching their full physical and cognitive potential.
- Underweight (Low weight-for-age): A child who is underweight may be wasted, stunted, or both.
The Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) Test
The MUAC test is a simple and effective screening tool, especially useful in resource-limited settings. For children aged 6 to 59 months, a color-coded tape measures the upper arm's circumference to quickly determine nutritional status.
- Green: 12.5 cm or more, indicating normal nutritional status.
- Yellow: 11 cm to 12.5 cm, indicating moderate acute malnutrition.
- Red: Less than 11 cm, indicating severe acute malnutrition.
Comparison of Malnutrition Assessment Tools
| Feature | GLIM (Adults) | MUAC (Children) | MNA-SF (Elderly) | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Multi-criteria diagnosis and severity grading. | Rapid screening and classification of acute malnutrition. | Screening for malnutrition risk. | 
| Key Measurements | Weight loss, BMI, muscle mass, food intake, inflammation. | Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), sometimes weight-for-height. | Food intake, weight loss, mobility, stress, neuropsychology, BMI or calf circumference. | 
| Assessment Type | Comprehensive, requires clinical judgment and data. | Quick, physical measurement with color-coded results. | Questionnaire-based screening tool. | 
| Outputs | Diagnosis (moderate or severe) and underlying etiology. | Color-coded risk status (Normal, Moderate, Severe). | Score-based classification (Normal, At-Risk, Malnourished). | 
| Strengths | Standardized, evidence-based for clinical settings. | Fast, simple, and effective in field conditions. | Tailored to the specific needs and risk factors of older adults. | 
Conclusion
Determining malnutrition severity is a critical step in providing appropriate nutritional care and preventing serious health complications. The approach varies depending on the patient's age, from the standardized GLIM framework for adults to specific anthropometric indicators like MUAC for children. The use of validated screening tools and a comprehensive assessment that includes physical examination, dietary history, and biochemical markers is essential for accurate diagnosis and grading. A clear and timely diagnosis allows healthcare professionals to develop a targeted management plan that can significantly improve patient outcomes. For example, studies have shown that patients with a proper diagnosis of malnutrition often have better outcomes when receiving tailored nutrition interventions.
References
- PMC. Characteristics and Outcomes of Adult Inpatients with Malnutrition. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6021228/
- WHO. Fact sheets - Malnutrition. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malnutrition