Skip to content

Is 500 or 800 Calories the Right Choice on the 5:2 Diet?

4 min read

According to research on intermittent fasting, a modified alternate-day fasting plan similar to the 5:2 diet can lead to a weight loss of 3–8% over 3–24 weeks. For those considering this popular regimen, the central question is whether to aim for 500 or 800 calories on the two designated fasting days.

Quick Summary

The debate over 500 or 800 calories on the 5:2 diet involves balancing weight loss speed with long-term adherence. While 500 calories is the original guideline, the 800-calorie version is often considered more sustainable, and both can be effective for weight management when paired with a healthy diet.

Key Points

  • Original Protocol: The original 5:2 diet recommended 500 calories for women and 600 for men on fast days for an aggressive calorie deficit.

  • Newer Approach: Updated versions, such as The Fast 800, advocate for a slightly higher and more manageable 800-calorie intake on fast days.

  • Sustainability vs. Speed: The 500-calorie plan may offer faster initial weight loss, but the 800-calorie plan is generally considered more sustainable and easier to follow long-term.

  • Side Effects: Lower calorie fasts are more likely to cause side effects like fatigue and hunger, while the 800-calorie option minimizes these effects.

  • Nutrient Density: Regardless of the calorie target, focusing on high-protein, high-fiber, and nutrient-dense foods is essential for managing hunger and maintaining health.

  • Personal Choice: The best approach depends on individual goals, health status, and lifestyle, with sustainability being a key factor for long-term success.

In This Article

The Origins of the 500-Calorie Fast

The original 5:2 diet, popularized by Dr. Michael Mosley, called for women to consume 500 calories and men to consume 600 calories on their two non-consecutive fasting days. This approach is based on a mathematical formula that calculates a significant calorie deficit, forcing the body to burn stored fat for energy. The rationale behind such a low number was to create a substantial energy gap just two days a week, rather than restricting calories every single day, which some people find easier to maintain.

Benefits and Drawbacks of the 500-Calorie Protocol

The primary advantage of the original 500-calorie fasting plan is the potential for faster, more significant weight loss in the short term due to the larger weekly calorie deficit. For individuals with a high motivation to see results quickly, this can be a powerful motivator. The approach is straightforward: eat a quarter of your typical daily caloric needs on two days.

However, the strict 500-calorie limit also comes with several drawbacks that make it challenging for many people. It can lead to increased feelings of fatigue, irritability, and intense hunger on fasting days, making it difficult to adhere to long-term. This level of restriction can also increase the risk of nutrient deficiencies if not planned carefully with highly nutrient-dense foods.

The Rise of the 800-Calorie Approach

In later iterations, such as The Fast 800, Dr. Michael Mosley and others began advocating for a slightly higher 800-calorie limit on fasting days, based on mounting evidence that this revised number was both effective and more sustainable. This updated version still promotes the metabolic benefits of intermittent fasting but is less severe.

Benefits and Drawbacks of the 800-Calorie Protocol

The key benefit of the 800-calorie fasting day is improved adherence. Many find this higher threshold easier to manage, reducing feelings of deprivation and the unpleasant side effects often associated with the 500-calorie plan, such as headaches and extreme fatigue. The increased calorie allowance offers more flexibility in meal planning, allowing for slightly larger or more varied meals, which can help control cravings. This sustainability is crucial for achieving long-term weight management.

On the other hand, the weight loss might be slightly slower compared to the more restrictive 500-calorie method. For those seeking rapid initial results, this might feel less impactful. Additionally, the 800-calorie approach still requires mindful eating and a nutrient-dense food focus to be truly effective.

Comparison Table: 500 Calories vs. 800 Calories on the 5:2 Diet

Feature 500 Calories (Original 5:2) 800 Calories (The Fast 800 / New 5:2)
Adherence Can be very challenging due to intense hunger and side effects like fatigue. Generally more sustainable and easier to stick with long-term.
Weight Loss Rate Potentially faster initial weight loss due to a more aggressive weekly calorie deficit. Often a more gradual and steady weight loss, which can lead to better long-term results.
Flexibility Extremely limited food choices and meal sizes, increasing the risk of nutrient gaps. Provides more flexibility for meal planning and managing hunger, with less risk of feeling deprived.
Side Effects Higher likelihood of experiencing negative side effects like headaches, irritability, and intense hunger. Lower incidence of adverse side effects, leading to a more positive fasting experience.
Scientific Basis Original basis for the diet, though research has shown 800 calories can still induce metabolic benefits. Supported by research demonstrating that 800 calories effectively promotes fat-burning and provides metabolic benefits.

How to Choose the Right Calorie Level

The decision between a 500 and 800-calorie fast day is a personal one that depends on several factors, including your health status, lifestyle, and weight loss goals. Here are some key considerations:

  • Assess your health: Before starting any fasting regimen, it is crucial to consult a healthcare professional, especially if you have pre-existing conditions like diabetes or a history of disordered eating. They can help determine which approach is safest for you.
  • Consider your fasting experience: If you are new to intermittent fasting, starting with the 800-calorie plan may be more manageable and help you ease into the routine without feeling overwhelmed by severe restriction. As you become more comfortable, you can evaluate if a lower calorie day is feasible.
  • Prioritize sustainability: The most effective diet is one you can stick to. If the 500-calorie plan leaves you feeling constantly hungry and irritable, you are more likely to abandon it altogether. The 800-calorie version is a more forgiving and sustainable option for many, leading to better long-term results.
  • Focus on nutrient quality: Regardless of the calorie count, the nutritional quality of your food is paramount. On fasting days, prioritize protein, fiber, and healthy fats from sources like vegetables, lean meats, fish, eggs, and nuts to maximize satiety and nutrient intake.

Conclusion: Which Calorie Target is Best for You?

There is no single correct answer to whether 500 or 800 calories is better on the 5:2 diet. The original 500-calorie protocol offers the potential for faster weight loss but is more challenging to maintain due to intense hunger and side effects. The updated 800-calorie plan, championed by newer iterations like The Fast 800, provides a more sustainable and flexible option that is easier to adhere to over the long run while still delivering effective results. Ultimately, the best choice is the one you can realistically sustain, prioritizing nutrient-dense foods on both fast days and normal eating days for optimal health and lasting success.

For more in-depth information and meal plans related to the updated approach, explore The Fast 800 resources.


Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before starting any new diet.

Frequently Asked Questions

Both calorie targets can lead to weight loss, but the best option depends on your personal tolerance. 500 calories may result in faster initial weight loss, while 800 is often more sustainable and leads to consistent, long-term results by being easier to stick with.

At 500 calories, common side effects can include heightened feelings of hunger, headaches, fatigue, and irritability. This is due to the more significant calorie restriction and can make adherence challenging for some individuals.

The change to 800 calories was made to improve adherence and sustainability. Research has shown that 800 calories is still effective for weight loss and achieving the metabolic benefits of intermittent fasting, but with fewer negative side effects.

On an 800-calorie fast day, focus on nutrient-dense foods that promote fullness. Prioritize meals rich in protein, healthy fats, and fiber, such as lean meats, eggs, fish, vegetables, and beans.

Yes, many modern versions of the 5:2 diet, such as The Fast 800, pair the fast days with a low-carbohydrate, Mediterranean-style diet on the five non-fasting days to enhance results.

Individuals who are pregnant, breastfeeding, diabetic, on certain medications, or have a history of disordered eating should avoid the 5:2 diet without strict medical supervision. Always consult a healthcare provider first.

No, the two fast days do not need to be consecutive. Spreading them out, such as on a Monday and Thursday, is a common practice that can make the diet more manageable.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.