Skip to content

Is Corona Premier Better Than Corona Light? A Nutritional Comparison for Your Diet

4 min read

With the growing popularity of low-calorie and low-carb beverages, consumers are scrutinizing their beer choices more than ever. This has led many to wonder: is Corona Premier better than Corona Light? We explore the nutritional differences and taste profiles to help you decide which Mexican lager is the right fit for your diet.

Quick Summary

This article compares Corona Premier and Corona Light based on nutritional information, flavor profile, and alcohol content. The analysis will determine which light lager is the superior choice for managing calories and carbohydrates without compromising taste.

Key Points

  • Nutritional Advantage: Corona Premier contains fewer calories (90 vs 99) and carbs (2.6g vs 4.8g) per 12 oz serving compared to Corona Light.

  • Taste Profile: Premier offers a smoother, drier taste, while Light has a more distinct hop and fruity-honey aroma.

  • Similar ABV: Both beers have an identical 4.0% ABV, so neither has an edge in alcohol content.

  • Subjective 'Better': Whether one is 'better' depends entirely on your dietary goals and personal taste preference.

  • Market Shift: Corona Premier has gained significant market share by targeting the low-carb trend, leading it to replace Corona Light in many establishments.

In This Article

Nutritional Showdown: Calories, Carbs, and ABV

When comparing the nutritional value of Corona Premier and Corona Light, the numbers tell a clear story. For those tracking macronutrients or calories, Corona Premier is the more lightweight option. A standard 12 oz serving of Corona Premier contains just 90 calories and a mere 2.6 grams of carbohydrates. In contrast, a 12 oz serving of Corona Light has 99 calories and 4.8 grams of carbs. This makes Premier the clear winner for anyone following a strict low-carb or ketogenic diet, as it offers a noticeable reduction in both metrics.

Interestingly, the alcohol content (ABV) is nearly identical for both beers at 4.0%. This means you get a comparable alcohol experience without the extra calories and carbs found in Corona Light. The slight difference in ABV reported in some older articles (Light at 4.1%) seems to have been standardized to 4.0% across recent data.

Decoding the Flavor Profile

Beyond the numbers, taste is a critical factor, and this is where the comparison becomes subjective. Corona Premier was specifically brewed to be an exceptionally smooth, premium light beer. It offers a clean, crisp finish with a pleasantly dry feel and a subtle touch of sweetness. The flavor is often described as minimal and uncomplicated, with faint malt and citrus notes, making it a highly drinkable and refreshing choice. Some reviewers note that it can taste somewhat watery, or like a 'flavored vitamin water' if not served icy cold.

Corona Light, on the other hand, is a pilsner-style lager known for its distinctly hop-forward flavor and a pleasant, fruity-honey aroma. Many consumers appreciate this flavor distinction, finding it more robust and satisfying than Premier. However, the clear glass bottles used for most Corona products can allow for 'skunking' when exposed to light, affecting the taste profile. Both beers are famously served with a lime wedge, which adds a tart, citrusy kick that complements and enhances the flavor of either option.

Taste vs. Macros: Which is 'Better' for You?

When deciding which beer is superior, it's essential to consider your priorities. If your primary concern is minimizing caloric and carbohydrate intake, Corona Premier is the unequivocally better choice. The difference of nine calories and over two grams of carbs per serving adds up quickly, especially if you plan on enjoying more than one.

However, if your preference leans towards a more classic, hop-forward pilsner taste, you might prefer Corona Light. Many longtime drinkers of Corona Light find Premier's flavor too subtle or thin. The best beer for you is the one that best aligns with your dietary goals and satisfies your personal taste. As one reviewer on Real Simple points out, the 'healthiest beer' depends on a variety of factors beyond just calories.

The Market Shift and Consumer Preference

Corona Premier's introduction in 2018 was a strategic move by Constellation Brands to cater to the growing demand for lower-calorie, premium light beers, a segment dominated by competitors like Michelob Ultra. This market shift has led to Premier replacing Light in many bars and stores, which has disappointed some loyal Corona Light drinkers. For many consumers, Premier hits the sweet spot, providing the classic Corona brand experience with the added benefit of better nutritional stats. This market behavior highlights the industry's response to consumer dietary trends and the prioritization of macro-consciousness in beverage choices.

Comparing Corona Premier and Corona Light

Feature Corona Premier Corona Light
Calories (per 12 oz) 90 99
Carbohydrates (per 12 oz) 2.6g 4.8g
ABV (Alcohol by Volume) 4.0% 4.0%
Flavor Profile Smooth, crisp, dry finish with subtle sweetness and citrus notes Distinct hop flavor, pleasant fruity-honey aroma
Best For Low-carb diets, minimal calorie intake, easy-drinking Those who prefer a more traditional pilsner taste with a light character

Factors to Consider Before Choosing

  • Dietary Goals: If reducing calories and carbs is your top priority, Premier is the clear choice. The difference, though small per beer, can be significant over several drinks.
  • Taste Preference: Consider whether you prefer a sweeter, smoother profile (Premier) or a more classic, hoppy lager (Light). Many long-time Light drinkers prefer its flavor.
  • Availability: Depending on your location and the establishment, one may be easier to find than the other, as Premier has increasingly replaced Light in some markets.
  • Serving Style: For those who dislike the potential for a 'skunked' taste from light exposure in bottles, both are available in cans, but it's a factor to be aware of, especially for Light.

Conclusion: Which Light Lager Wins?

Ultimately, deciding whether Corona Premier is better than Corona Light depends entirely on what you value in a beer. For the diet-conscious drinker prioritizing the lowest possible calories and carbohydrates, Corona Premier is the definitive winner. Its smooth, dry finish is built for easy drinking and fits neatly into most low-carb plans. However, for those who prefer the flavor of a more traditional light pilsner with a hoppy kick, Corona Light still has its loyal fanbase, despite its slightly higher calorie and carb count. The good news is that both provide a light, refreshing experience, especially with a slice of lime. So whether you choose Premier for the macros or Light for the taste, you're still enjoying a laid-back, Mexican lager. For more general advice on navigating healthier beverage choices, resources on mindful consumption can be helpful.

Real Simple: 12 Better-for-You Beers, According to RDNs

Frequently Asked Questions

Corona Premier has fewer calories, with 90 per 12 oz serving compared to Corona Light's 99 calories.

Corona Premier has a significantly lower carb count, with 2.6g per 12 oz serving, while Corona Light contains 4.8g.

Yes, taste differs. Premier is often described as smoother and drier with a hint of sweetness, whereas Light has a more prominent hop flavor and a fruity-honey aroma.

Yes, both Corona Premier and Corona Light have a 4.0% alcohol by volume (ABV).

Premier was launched to appeal to consumers seeking an even lower-calorie and lower-carb "superior light lager" experience, capitalizing on market trends.

Yes, like other Corona products, Premier can be enjoyed with a lime, which many people feel complements its flavor profile.

While Corona Premier has become more widely available and replaced Light in some areas, there is no official confirmation that Corona Light is being fully discontinued across all markets.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.