The practice of eating just one big meal a day, often referred to as OMAD (One Meal A Day), is a form of extreme intermittent fasting that has garnered significant attention for its potential to aid weight loss and simplify eating habits. However, this method is also associated with considerable health risks, from nutritional deficiencies to negative metabolic effects. While some individuals may experience initial weight loss due to a calorie deficit, experts often advise caution and recommend considering more balanced and sustainable alternatives for long-term health.
What happens to your body on an OMAD diet?
Restricting eating to a single meal causes metabolic and physiological changes. During the fasting period (around 23 hours), the body enters a fasted state, shifting from burning glucose to burning stored fat (metabolic switching). This can lead to increased fat oxidation and potential weight loss. Intermittent fasting, including OMAD, may also improve insulin sensitivity and blood sugar control, and trigger autophagy, a cellular self-cleaning process. However, this can also increase ghrelin (hunger hormone) and potentially cortisol (stress hormone) levels and blood pressure in some individuals. Crucially, meeting daily nutritional requirements in one meal is extremely challenging, potentially leading to deficiencies.
The significant health risks of eating one meal a day
Despite potential benefits, OMAD carries significant risks. Experts raise concerns about its impact on health, especially for vulnerable groups.
- Nutrient deficiencies: One meal often lacks sufficient essential nutrients like calcium, iron, and vitamins, leading to fatigue and weakened health.
- Elevated cholesterol and blood pressure: Studies suggest OMAD can increase LDL cholesterol and blood pressure, even in healthy individuals, raising cardiovascular risk.
- Increased mortality risk: Research links eating one meal daily to higher risks of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in adults over 40.
- Unstable energy levels: Irregular energy supply can cause fatigue, dizziness, irritability, and concentration issues.
- Disordered eating behaviors: OMAD's restrictive nature may promote unhealthy eating patterns like binge eating, particularly risky for those with a history of such disorders.
- Muscle mass loss: Extreme fasting might contribute to losing lean body mass, impacting metabolism and health.
OMAD vs. Other Intermittent Fasting Methods
| Feature | One Meal A Day (OMAD) | 16:8 Intermittent Fasting | 
|---|---|---|
| Eating Window | Very narrow (typically 1 hour) | Wider (8-hour window, e.g., noon to 8 p.m.) | 
| Fasting Period | Very long (23 hours) | Moderate (16 hours) | 
| Nutrient Intake | Difficult to meet all daily needs in one sitting, high risk of deficiencies | Easier to meet nutritional needs with multiple meals during the eating window | 
| Sustainability | Low sustainability for most due to social and physical challenges | More sustainable for many people; less extreme restriction | 
| Side Effects | Higher risk of fatigue, irritability, dizziness, and binge eating | Lower risk of extreme hunger, fatigue, and other side effects | 
| Metabolic Effects | Can cause larger blood sugar spikes and hormonal fluctuations | Generally promotes more stable blood sugar levels during the feeding window | 
| Expert Recommendation | Not widely recommended, particularly for long-term use | Often recommended as a more balanced starting point for time-restricted eating | 
Sustainable Alternatives to OMAD
For those interested in time-restricted eating without OMAD's risks, more sustainable intermittent fasting protocols exist. The 16:8 method involves a 16-hour fast and an 8-hour eating window, making it easier to consume a balanced diet. The 5:2 diet involves normal eating five days a week and calorie restriction on two non-consecutive days. These methods offer greater flexibility and reduce nutritional risks compared to daily prolonged fasting. Combining these with a whole-foods diet and exercise is a more effective and healthier long-term strategy.
Conclusion: Is it okay to just eat one big meal a day?
Eating one big meal a day may cause short-term weight loss but is generally unsustainable and potentially dangerous due to risks like nutrient deficiencies, metabolic issues, and disordered eating. More moderate intermittent fasting methods, like 16:8, offer similar metabolic benefits with fewer drawbacks. A balanced diet of nutrient-dense foods, hydration, and exercise remains the safest approach for long-term health. Consulting a healthcare professional before starting any extreme diet is always recommended.
What to consider before starting an extreme fasting regimen
Extreme fasting like OMAD is not for everyone. Factors like age, gender, activity level, and medical history are crucial considerations. The significant calorie restriction requires careful planning to avoid nutrient gaps. Psychological and social aspects can also negatively impact food relationships and social life. The aim should be a sustainable, healthy lifestyle. OMAD is specifically not recommended for individuals with diabetes, pregnant women, or those with a history of eating disorders.