Skip to content

Is Lunchly better for you than Lunchables?

4 min read

Despite influencer marketing claiming Lunchly is a 'better-for-you' option, Consumer Reports testing found concerning levels of heavy metals in Lunchly kits, prompting the question: is Lunchly better for you than Lunchables?

Quick Summary

An in-depth nutritional analysis and ingredient breakdown of Lunchly and Lunchables reveals both are highly processed foods. Marketing comparisons highlighting lower calories or sugar don't tell the full story about sodium, additives, and potential heavy metals in these pre-packaged kits.

Key Points

  • Not a Healthy Alternative: Despite influencer marketing, expert analysis shows Lunchly is not a significantly healthier option than Lunchables.

  • High in Processed Ingredients: Both Lunchly and Lunchables are highly processed foods containing refined carbohydrates, additives, and high amounts of sodium.

  • Heavy Metal Concerns: A Consumer Reports test found detectable and potentially concerning levels of lead and cadmium in both Lunchly and Lunchables kits.

  • Artificial Sweeteners vs. Sugar: Lunchly reduces total sugar by using artificial sweeteners in its Prime drink, which health experts caution is not necessarily a healthier swap.

  • Minimal Nutritional Gains: Any marginal gains in lower calories or sugar in Lunchly are offset by other nutritional concerns, and smaller portion sizes can be a factor.

  • DIY Kits are Best: For a truly healthy lunch, homemade kits using whole, fresh foods in a bento box are recommended over either pre-packaged option.

  • Focus on Sodium and Additives: High sodium content and processed meats are key concerns in both brands, regardless of the marketing hype.

In This Article

The Hype vs. The Hard Facts: What's in Each Kit?

Launched by online influencers MrBeast, KSI, and Logan Paul, Lunchly entered the market with bold claims of being a healthier alternative to the long-standing Lunchables. The marketing strategy heavily relies on the personalities behind the product and a direct 'us vs. them' comparison on the company's website. A standard Lunchly kit includes a main course (like Turkey Stack 'Ems), a Prime Hydration drink, and a Feastables chocolate bar.

In contrast, the classic Lunchables typically feature a main dish, a Capri Sun drink, and a small candy or treat. The longevity of the Lunchables brand means it has a nostalgic appeal for many parents, but it has long been criticized for its highly processed ingredients, excessive sodium, and added sugars. While Lunchly attempts to capitalize on these criticisms, a closer examination reveals that the differences are not as significant as the influencers might suggest. The comparison isn't as simple as checking one or two stats on a label, but requires a deeper dive into overall nutritional quality and potential contaminants.

The Head-to-Head Nutritional Breakdown

When comparing specific menu items side-by-side, such as the Turkey Stack 'Ems and a comparable Lunchables Cracker Stacker kit, some differences emerge, but they are far from a definitive win for Lunchly. For example, some Lunchly kits boast lower calorie and total sugar counts. This is largely due to the inclusion of Prime Hydration, which uses artificial sweeteners like sucralose and acesulfame potassium instead of sugar. However, nutrition experts and organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) question whether replacing sugar with artificial sweeteners is a genuine improvement, citing potential health risks and a lack of evidence for weight management. The lower calorie count, while touted as a benefit, is also often attributed to smaller serving sizes rather than a fundamental difference in product quality.

The Hidden Concerns: Sodium, Fat, and Additives

Beyond calories and sugar, other nutritional factors are equally, if not more, important. One of the most significant concerns for both brands is the high sodium content. Despite being relatively small meals, both Lunchly and Lunchables kits can provide a substantial portion of a child's recommended daily sodium intake, sometimes nearly half. Excessive sodium consumption in childhood is linked to a higher risk of elevated blood pressure, which can lead to long-term health issues. Similarly, both products contain significant levels of saturated fat and are low in dietary fiber, a crucial nutrient that most children need more of. Both brands use processed meats, such as deli turkey and pepperoni, which have been linked to an increased risk of certain cancers and cardiovascular disease.

Comparison Table: Lunchly vs. Lunchables (Turkey & Cheese Kits)

Feature Lunchly Turkey Stack 'Ems Lunchables Cracker Stackers (Turkey & Cheddar)
Main Components Turkey, Cheddar, Crackers Turkey, Cheddar, Crackers
Included Drink Prime Hydration (Artificially Sweetened) Capri Sun (Juice, Sugar, Sweeteners)
Included Treat Feastables Milk Chocolate Bar Sweet treat (e.g., Reese's)
Calories ~230 ~310
Sugar ~7g (Total Sugars) ~21g (Total Sugars)
Sodium ~480mg ~570mg
Electrolytes 400mg (from Prime) 55mg (from Capri Sun)
Refined Carbs High (Crackers) High (Crackers)
Processed Meats Yes Yes

The Verdict on Hidden Health Risks: Heavy Metals and Plastics

Perhaps the most concerning findings come from independent lab testing. A Consumer Reports investigation found detectable levels of heavy metals, including lead and cadmium, in the Lunchly kits tested in 2025. The levels of lead were significant enough that, when combined with other typical exposures, they could push a child's intake over safe levels. The study noted that previous testing on Lunchables also showed comparable levels of heavy metals. Furthermore, tests revealed varying levels of phthalates, endocrine-disrupting chemicals found in plastic packaging, in both brands, although typically at lower levels in Lunchly. While both companies state their products are safe and meet regulations, health experts emphasize minimizing exposure to these contaminants, particularly for children.

A Healthier Alternative: Building Your Own Lunch Kits

For parents seeking a genuinely healthier and often more affordable alternative, crafting your own lunch kit is the best option. Replicating the appeal of pre-packaged kits is easy with a multi-compartment bento box. This allows you to control the ingredients and nutritional content entirely.

Here are some ideas for a DIY lunch kit:

  • Mini Pita Pockets: Fill with hummus, sliced cucumber, cherry tomatoes, and feta cheese cubes.
  • Protein Power Pack: Include hard-boiled eggs, cheese cubes, whole-grain crackers, and baby carrots with a side of ranch dressing.
  • Deconstructed Sushi Rolls: Combine California rolls, edamame (thawed), and kiwi slices for an exciting meal.
  • Taco Bento: Fill compartments with cooked ground turkey, shredded cheese, salsa, and whole-grain tortilla chips.
  • Simple Snack Plate: Pack mozzarella balls, olives, whole-grain crackers, and melon chunks.

Conclusion: More Hype Than Health

Despite the slick marketing and influencer endorsements, the answer to the question, 'Is Lunchly better for you than Lunchables?' is a resounding no, or at best, only marginally so. Both products are highly processed, containing concerning levels of sodium, refined carbohydrates, and additives. While Lunchly kits may have slightly lower calories and sugar due to artificial sweeteners, this doesn't automatically make them a healthy choice. The presence of heavy metals and processed meats in both brands further highlights that convenience comes at a nutritional cost. Ultimately, a truly healthy lunch for a child involves fresh, whole foods, and a DIY approach is the safest and most nutritious option. A detailed breakdown of the safety and nutritional concerns for both products was published by Consumer Reports, providing parents with a much-needed factual perspective on the influencer-fueled marketing. For more information, read the original report Consumer Reports on Lunchly vs. Lunchables.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, Lunchly is not considered a healthy choice for children. While it may have slightly lower calories and sugar than some Lunchables kits, it is still a highly processed food with high sodium, additives, and potential heavy metals.

Yes, a Consumer Reports investigation found detectable levels of heavy metals, including lead and cadmium, in both Lunchly and Lunchables kits during testing.

The most significant difference often highlighted in marketing is Lunchly's lower sugar content, achieved by using artificially sweetened Prime drinks instead of sugary juice pouches. However, experts caution that this isn't necessarily a healthier alternative.

Yes, just like Lunchables, Lunchly kits are high in sodium. A single kit can contribute a significant portion of a child's daily recommended sodium intake.

Yes, nutrition experts overwhelmingly agree that packing a homemade lunch with fresh, whole foods is the best and healthiest option. It allows you to control all ingredients and avoid processed additives and high sodium.

Prime Hydration is a sports drink that uses artificial sweeteners and contains added electrolytes. Experts state that sports drinks are generally unnecessary for children, who can get sufficient electrolytes from a balanced diet and water.

Lunchly was launched by social media influencers MrBeast, KSI, and Logan Paul. Critics argue that their celebrity status gives a false sense of healthiness to a product that is ultimately still ultra-processed.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.