Skip to content

Is there really a negative calorie food? The definitive nutrition diet breakdown

5 min read

Despite a persistent diet myth, no food has ever been scientifically proven to contain "negative calories". So, is there really a negative calorie food that helps you lose weight just by eating it, or is the concept a clever piece of marketing that's too good to be true?

Quick Summary

The concept of negative calorie foods is not supported by science. While certain low-calorie, high-fiber foods fill you up, they do not burn more energy during digestion than they provide, as is often claimed.

Key Points

  • The Myth Debunked: No scientific evidence supports the existence of negative calorie foods; all foods provide a net energy gain.

  • Thermic Effect of Food (TEF): The energy used for digestion (TEF) is too small to make any food negative calorie, typically accounting for only about 10% of total daily energy expenditure.

  • Satiety is the Key: Foods often mislabeled as negative calorie are simply low in calories and high in water and fiber, which helps promote a feeling of fullness and reduces overall intake.

  • Balanced Nutrition: Focusing on the myth can lead to a narrow, nutrient-deficient diet, whereas a balanced approach ensures you get all essential nutrients.

  • Real Weight Loss: Sustainable weight management is achieved through a combination of a balanced, low-calorie diet and regular exercise, not by relying on supposed "magic" foods.

  • Scientific Backing: Studies, including empirical animal tests and human clinical trials, have consistently refuted the negative calorie food concept.

In This Article

The Science Behind the 'Negative Calorie' Myth

The enduring belief that some foods, like celery or grapefruit, can have a "negative calorie" effect stems from a misunderstanding of how the body processes food. This myth suggests that the energy required to chew, digest, and metabolize these particular items exceeds the energy they provide. While our bodies do expend energy on this process, known as the thermic effect of food (TEF), this energy expenditure is far too small to create a net negative calorie balance.

For example, even the most fibrous and water-rich foods still contain a small number of calories. The body is an exceptionally efficient machine, designed through evolution to extract and utilize as much energy as possible from the food we consume. A stick of celery, though low in calories, still provides a small net energy gain after digestion, not a deficit. Relying on this myth can lead to poor dietary choices and neglect of other essential nutrients.

The Thermic Effect of Food (TEF) Explained

The thermic effect of food (TEF) is the energy expenditure above our resting metabolic rate due to the cost of processing food for use and storage. TEF is a real physiological process, but its scale is often exaggerated in popular diet culture. The percentage of calories burned through TEF varies significantly depending on the macronutrient composition of the meal:

  • Protein: Has the highest TEF, requiring about 20–30% of its caloric energy to be processed.
  • Carbohydrates: Have a moderate TEF, using about 5–10% of their energy.
  • Fats: Have the lowest TEF, with only 0–3% of their energy used for processing.

Given that most "negative calorie" foods are primarily carbohydrates and water, their TEF is on the low end of this scale, making a true net negative impossible. High-protein foods, while having a higher TEF, are not negative calorie either. The energy gain from any food item will always outweigh the energy expended to digest it.

Debunking Popular "Negative Calorie" Foods

Many foods frequently touted as having a negative calorie effect are simply very low in caloric density and high in water and fiber. Here are some common examples and why they don't live up to the claim:

  • Celery: Often considered the prime example, celery is mostly water and fiber. A cup contains about 14 calories, and the energy needed to chew and digest it is minimal, leaving a net calorie gain.
  • Grapefruit: While a healthy, nutrient-rich choice, a cup of grapefruit contains around 69 calories, far more than its digestion cost.
  • Lettuce: Like celery, lettuce is mostly water. A cup of shredded lettuce contains only about 5 calories, but again, this is still a net gain for the body.
  • Cucumber: Composed of over 95% water, cucumbers are hydrating and low-calorie but provide a small amount of energy upon consumption.

Research Refuting the Myth

Scientific evidence has consistently failed to support the existence of negative calorie foods. One study, published in bioRxiv, examined the energy balance of bearded dragons fed celery, a commonly cited negative-calorie food. The researchers found that the lizards still gained a net energy of 24% from the meal, unequivocally refuting the negative calorie claim.

Clinical trials have also investigated diets focusing on these supposed "negative calorie" items. A study on overweight women compared a so-called "negative-calorie food" diet with a standard low-calorie diet. While both diets resulted in weight loss, the study found no significant advantage to the negative calorie approach, indicating its concept has no practical application. The weight loss observed is simply due to the overall lower calorie intake from replacing energy-dense foods with low-calorie, high-volume alternatives.

Low-Calorie, High-Volume Foods vs. The Myth

The real benefit of foods like celery and lettuce lies not in any mythical calorie-burning power, but in their ability to promote satiety with a minimal caloric cost. Here's a comparison to clarify the difference:

Feature Focusing on Negative Calorie Myth Focusing on Healthy, Low-Calorie Foods
Mechanism Believing food burns more energy than it provides, leading to a negative calorie balance. Understanding that high-water and high-fiber foods promote fullness and help control overall calorie intake.
Effectiveness Not supported by science. Can lead to an imbalanced diet if other nutrient-rich foods are ignored. A proven strategy for weight management by creating a calorie deficit through portion control.
Nutrient Intake Risk of missing out on essential nutrients like protein and healthy fats by focusing on a narrow list. Encourages a diverse range of nutrient-dense foods, ensuring a balanced intake of all macronutrients and micronutrients.
Sustainability Can lead to restrictive and ultimately unsustainable eating habits due to unrealistic expectations. Promotes long-term, healthy dietary patterns by emphasizing balanced and satisfying meals.

The Healthy, Sustainable Approach

Instead of chasing the elusive negative calorie food, a more effective and sustainable approach to weight management involves building a balanced diet rich in nutrient-dense foods. Incorporating low-calorie, high-volume foods like vegetables and fruits is a powerful strategy because it helps you feel full without consuming excess calories. The key is to see these foods as valuable components of a varied diet, not as magic bullets.

For example, loading your plate with a large salad of leafy greens, cucumber, and tomatoes provides a significant amount of bulk and fiber, which helps curb appetite. Pairing this with a lean protein source and a small amount of healthy fat will create a balanced meal that promotes satiety and provides all the necessary nutrients.

Conclusion: The Final Verdict on Negative Calorie Foods

In the final analysis, the concept of negative calorie foods is a persistent diet myth with no basis in science. While the idea of eating your way to a calorie deficit is appealing, our bodies' digestive processes, governed by the thermic effect of food, do not allow for it. The real power of foods often labeled as "negative calorie" lies in their low energy density and high fiber content, which aid weight management by helping you feel full on fewer calories. Focusing on a balanced, nutrient-rich diet with a variety of whole foods remains the most reliable and healthiest path to achieving your nutrition and weight goals. To learn more about effective and sustainable weight management strategies, consult with a registered dietitian or healthcare professional.

Examine.com provides a comprehensive and science-backed perspective on the thermic effect of food and its relation to the negative calorie myth.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, chewing and digesting celery does not burn more calories than the food contains. While celery is very low in calories, your body is an efficient energy extractor and will always gain a small, net positive amount of calories from it.

These foods are often mislabeled as 'negative calorie' because of their low caloric density and high water and fiber content, which helps create a feeling of fullness. The term is not based on scientific fact but is a popular diet myth.

TEF is the energy your body uses to digest, absorb, and metabolize food. It's real, but it only accounts for a small percentage (around 10%) of your total daily energy expenditure, making it impossible for any food to burn more calories than it contains.

While it may lead to initial weight loss due to a low overall calorie intake, a diet restricted to only these foods is not sustainable and lacks vital nutrients like protein and healthy fats. It is healthier and more effective to incorporate them into a balanced diet.

Yes, there is a phenomenon called the "negative calorie illusion" where people may overestimate the healthiness or underestimate the calories of a meal that includes a perceived healthy, low-calorie food.

They help by filling your stomach and promoting satiety. By eating a large volume of these foods, you feel fuller, which helps reduce your overall calorie intake and control your appetite.

Focus on a balanced diet rich in a variety of whole foods, including lean proteins, whole grains, and healthy fats, alongside your fruits and vegetables. Emphasize portion control and regular physical activity for sustainable weight management.

Drinking cold water does cause a very small and insignificant increase in metabolic rate as your body expends energy to warm it. The effect is minimal and will not lead to noticeable weight loss.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.