Skip to content

Is Tree Bark Toxic? Navigating the Dangers and Benefits

5 min read

According to the National Park Service, the manchineel tree, found in the Americas, is so toxic that rain dripping from its leaves can cause blistering, and burning its wood releases toxic smoke. This extreme example highlights the critical question: is tree bark toxic?

Quick Summary

The toxicity of tree bark varies significantly by species and preparation. While some inner barks are edible and have medicinal properties, others are highly poisonous to humans and pets, posing risks of chemical poisoning, internal injury, or intestinal blockage. Proper identification is crucial for safety.

Key Points

  • Toxicity is species-specific: The toxicity of tree bark varies significantly, with some barks being edible (inner bark only) and others being highly poisonous.

  • Inner bark vs. outer bark: Edible bark is almost always the inner cambium layer, located between the outer bark and the wood, while the outer bark is largely indigestible.

  • Risks for pets: Even non-toxic bark can harm pets by causing intestinal blockages, splinters, or digestive irritation. Cocoa mulch is especially toxic to dogs.

  • Edible examples: Inner bark from certain pine species, birch, and slippery elm can be prepared and consumed safely under the right conditions.

  • Toxic examples: Poisonous barks come from trees like black locust, cherry (containing cyanide-like compounds), and the manchineel tree.

  • Contamination concerns: Bark can absorb environmental pollutants and pesticides, making it unsafe even if the tree species is typically non-toxic.

  • Historical uses: Indigenous peoples and pioneers used edible inner bark as a nutritional supplement or survival food, often grinding it into flour.

  • Medicinal properties: Some barks, like willow and oak, have medicinal properties due to their chemical compounds, but their use requires expert knowledge.

In This Article

Understanding Bark: A Complex Plant Structure

Tree bark is more than just a tree's outer layer; it is a complex, multi-layered protective tissue. The outer bark, or rhytidome, is the hard, dead layer that insulates and defends against pests, fire, and weather. Beneath this lies the inner bark, which includes the nutrient-rich cambium layer and the phloem, which transports sugars and water. While some inner barks are edible and historically used as a food source, the presence of various natural chemicals and the risk of contamination means a cautious approach is essential.

The Dangers of Consuming Tree Bark

Just because some bark is edible doesn't mean all bark is safe. The risks associated with consuming bark, whether by humans or pets, can be severe. One of the most significant dangers is misidentification. A forager might mistake a poisonous tree for an edible one, leading to serious illness or death. Additionally, external factors can render even safe bark dangerous. Urban trees might have pesticide residues or pollutants, which can be absorbed into the bark.

For pets, especially dogs, chewing on bark presents several non-toxic but still serious hazards. Splinters from dried, aged bark can cause internal injuries to the mouth, throat, and digestive tract. Large pieces can lead to intestinal blockage, a medical emergency that requires immediate veterinary attention. Cocoa mulch, which is derived from cacao trees, contains theobromine and is highly toxic to dogs, attracting them with its chocolaty smell.

Identifying Toxic and Edible Barks

Proper identification is key to avoiding toxic bark. Foragers must learn species-specific characteristics and avoid consuming any bark from an unknown tree. It is generally the inner bark, or cambium layer, that is sought after for edibility and nutritional value, while the outer bark is typically indigestible and can be rough. Native Americans and survivalists have long known how to harvest and prepare certain inner barks safely.

However, this requires expertise, and amateur consumption is ill-advised. For instance, while most pine species have edible inner bark, the Ponderosa pine is toxic and should be avoided. The black locust tree's bark contains toxalbumins and is poisonous to humans and livestock. In contrast, the inner bark of a slippery elm is known for its mucilaginous, or gummy, qualities and medicinal use.

Comparison of Edible vs. Toxic Barks

Characteristic Edible Barks (e.g., Pine, Birch, Slippery Elm) Toxic Barks (e.g., Black Locust, Yew, Manchineel)
Layer Inner cambium is edible; outer bark is not. All parts, including inner and outer bark, can be highly poisonous.
Nutritional Value Can be a source of calories, vitamins, and minerals. Contains compounds with no nutritional benefit; can be fatal.
Chemical Compounds May contain beneficial compounds (e.g., salicin in willow, tannins in oak for medicine). Contains dangerous toxins like toxalbumins (black locust), theobromine (cocoa mulch), or cyanide-like compounds (cherry).
Preparation Often dried, powdered into flour, boiled, or eaten raw in a survival situation. No safe preparation for consumption; should not be ingested at all.
Physical Hazard Still presents a risk of splinters or digestive blockage if consumed improperly. Poses both chemical and physical hazards, including severe irritation from contact.

Medicinal and Industrial Uses of Tree Bark

Tree bark is not only a source of potential food but has also been utilized for centuries in medicine and industry. For instance, the bark of the Cinchona tree was historically used to extract quinine, an antimalarial treatment. The bark of willow trees contains salicin, a compound similar to aspirin, used for pain relief and fever reduction. While these medicinal properties are intriguing, they underscore that bark contains potent chemical compounds that should be used with extreme caution and expert guidance, not casual foraging.

Industrially, bark is a valuable byproduct. The bark of the cork oak is used for cork production, while the bark from certain trees can be used for tannins in leather production. It is also shredded into mulch for landscaping, which, as mentioned, can be a hazard for pets if the wrong type (like cocoa mulch) is used.

Conclusion: Caution is Key

In conclusion, the question "is tree bark toxic?" does not have a simple yes or no answer. The edibility and safety of tree bark depend entirely on the tree species, how it was grown, and the specific part of the bark being considered. While some inner barks have been used as a survival food and in herbal medicine, many types of bark are toxic and can be fatal if ingested by humans or pets. The risks of misidentification, intestinal blockage, and chemical contamination are significant. Therefore, it is crucial to avoid consuming any tree bark unless you are an expert and can positively identify the species and its safety. For pets, the safest approach is to prevent them from chewing on any bark at all to avoid both toxicity and physical injury.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a professional before consuming any wild plant.

How to Distinguish Between Toxic and Edible Tree Bark

  • Know Your Trees: Learn to identify local tree species. Avoid foraging if you are unsure of the tree's identity, especially those known to be toxic, like yew and black locust.
  • Inner vs. Outer Bark: Remember that for edible species, only the inner cambium layer is consumed, not the tough, indigestible outer bark.
  • Observe and Prepare: Watch for any signs of mold, insects, or chemical treatments on the bark. For edible types, proper preparation, such as boiling or drying, is essential for safe consumption.
  • Safety First: Prioritize safety over curiosity. Never experiment with unknown tree barks, and always assume any unidentified bark is toxic.

Final Thoughts on Is Tree Bark Toxic

The natural world is full of wonders, but it is also full of hazards. Tree bark is no exception. Understanding that not all bark is created equal is the first step toward safety. By respecting the potent and complex nature of tree bark, you can appreciate the environment without putting yourself or your pets at risk. The knowledge of which bark is safe and which is not is a skill that takes time to learn, and in the absence of that expertise, avoidance is the best policy.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, not all tree bark is poisonous. Some species, like certain pines and birch, have edible inner bark (cambium layer), while others, such as black locust and manchineel, are highly toxic.

Most natural bark from common trees like pine and cedar is considered non-toxic to dogs. However, cocoa mulch is highly toxic due to its theobromine content and should always be avoided. The larger risk for pets comes from splinters and choking, so supervised chewing is necessary.

Only the inner bark, specifically the cambium layer, of certain edible tree species should be consumed. The tough, outer bark is inedible and indigestible.

The effects vary depending on the tree species and amount consumed, but can range from mild gastrointestinal distress to severe symptoms like neurological disorders, kidney damage, or death. Immediate medical attention is necessary.

The only way to differentiate is through expert identification of the tree species. Relying on generalized appearance can lead to dangerous errors. If you are not a foraging expert, do not attempt to consume any bark.

Yes, some barks have historical medicinal uses. For example, willow bark contains salicin, a precursor to aspirin, while slippery elm bark is used for soothing sore throats. However, these remedies should not be used without professional medical advice.

Most commercial bark mulches from pine or spruce are safe. However, avoid cocoa mulch in areas accessible to pets due to its toxicity. Also, ensure the mulch is free from harmful chemical treatments or dyes by purchasing from a reputable supplier.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.