Skip to content

Understanding the Method for Determining Total Protein

4 min read

According to Thermo Fisher Scientific, quantifying protein concentration is an essential part of most laboratory workflows involving protein samples. The method for determining total protein varies based on required sensitivity, sample volume, and compatibility with other substances.

Quick Summary

Several laboratory methods are used to determine total protein concentration, with techniques ranging from simple UV-Vis spectrophotometry to more complex colorimetric assays like Bradford, Lowry, and BCA. The choice of method depends on the specific sample characteristics, desired accuracy, and presence of interfering substances.

Key Points

  • Bradford Assay: A rapid, dye-binding colorimetric assay using Coomassie Blue G-250, but it is sensitive to detergents and has a protein-specific response.

  • Lowry Method: A two-step colorimetric assay that is highly sensitive but more time-consuming and prone to interference from various buffer components.

  • BCA Assay: An improved colorimetric method with better detergent compatibility and higher sensitivity than Bradford, though it can still be affected by reducing agents.

  • UV Spectrophotometry (A280): A fast and non-destructive technique best suited for pure protein samples but susceptible to interference from nucleic acids and variations in amino acid composition.

  • Kjeldahl Method: A classic, highly accurate method based on measuring total nitrogen content, which is then converted to protein; it is time-consuming and uses hazardous reagents.

  • Optimal Method Selection: Choosing the right assay depends on factors like sample purity, potential interfering substances, required sensitivity, speed, and cost.

In This Article

Core Principles of Total Protein Quantification

Determining the total protein concentration in a sample is a fundamental task in biochemistry, molecular biology, and clinical diagnostics. The choice of technique depends heavily on the sample type, required sensitivity, available equipment, and potential interfering agents. All quantification methods rely on measuring a protein's inherent properties or a specific chemical reaction to infer its total concentration relative to a standard curve.

Colorimetric Assays

Colorimetric assays use chemical reagents that change color in proportion to the amount of protein present. The intensity of the color change is measured with a spectrophotometer at a specific wavelength, and the protein concentration is then calculated using a standard curve generated with known protein concentrations.

  • Bradford Assay: This is a quick and sensitive dye-binding method developed by Marion Bradford in 1976. It relies on the binding of Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 dye to basic and aromatic amino acid residues (primarily arginine) in a protein. In acidic conditions, the dye changes color from reddish-brown ($λ{max}$ = 465 nm) to blue ($λ{max}$ = 595 nm) when it binds to protein. The absorbance at 595 nm is directly proportional to the protein concentration.
  • Lowry Method: The Lowry method, first described in 1951, is a two-step process that offers high sensitivity, often more so than the Biuret method. First, proteins chelate copper ions under alkaline conditions, similar to the Biuret reaction. Second, the resulting copper-protein complex reduces the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid), producing a characteristic dark-blue color that is measured at 660 nm.
  • BCA (Bicinchoninic Acid) Assay: The BCA assay is a modified version of the Lowry method developed in 1985. It also involves a two-step reaction where proteins first reduce copper ions in an alkaline medium. The BCA reagent then chelates the reduced cuprous ions ($Cu^+$), forming an intense purple-colored complex that is measured at 562 nm. This assay is known for its high sensitivity and compatibility with some detergents.

UV Spectrophotometry (A280)

This is a simple, rapid, and non-destructive method for quantifying pure proteins. Aromatic amino acids, particularly tryptophan and tyrosine, absorb ultraviolet light at a wavelength of 280 nm. The concentration of the protein can be calculated from its absorbance at 280 nm using the Beer-Lambert law ($A = εcl$), provided that the molar extinction coefficient (ε) of the protein is known. While quick and reagent-free, this method is susceptible to interference from nucleic acids and is not accurate for protein mixtures with varying aromatic amino acid content.

Kjeldahl Method

This classic method, developed in 1883, measures the total organic nitrogen content of a sample, from which the total protein concentration is inferred using a conversion factor (e.g., 6.25 for many foods). It involves three main steps: digestion of the sample with concentrated sulfuric acid to convert organic nitrogen to ammonium sulfate, distillation to release ammonia gas, and titration to quantify the nitrogen. While highly accurate and reproducible, it is time-consuming, uses hazardous chemicals, and overestimates protein by including non-protein nitrogen.

Comparison of Total Protein Determination Methods

Feature Bradford Assay Lowry Method BCA Assay UV Spectrophotometry (A280) Kjeldahl Method
Principle Dye-binding to protein Copper chelation & Folin reagent reduction Copper chelation & BCA complex formation Intrinsic absorbance of aromatic amino acids Nitrogen quantification via acid digestion
Speed Fast (5–10 min) Slower (40+ min) Medium (15–30 min) Very fast (<5 min) Slow (1–2 hrs)
Sensitivity High (1–2000 µg/mL) High (0.005–1 mg/mL) High (20–2000 µg/mL) Medium (depends on protein) High (for nitrogen)
Interferences Detergents, strong bases, some salts Buffers (Tris, EDTA), detergents, reducing agents Reducing agents, copper chelators Nucleic acids, other chromophores Non-protein nitrogen compounds
Reagents Fewer reagents, pre-mixed dye available Multiple reagents, some unstable Single working reagent None Hazardous strong acids and catalysts
Compatibility Broad compatibility with many buffers Limited compatibility due to interferences Better compatibility with detergents than Bradford Only for pure protein samples Broad compatibility, but destroys sample
Relative Cost Low Low Moderate Very low (no reagents) High (equipment, reagents, disposal)

Key Factors for Method Selection

Choosing the right method for determining total protein is a critical decision that impacts the accuracy and reliability of results. Several factors should be considered:

  • Sample Purity and Composition: For pure protein solutions, UV spectrophotometry is ideal. For crude cell lysates or complex mixtures, colorimetric assays like Bradford, Lowry, or BCA are more appropriate.
  • Interfering Substances: The presence of detergents, reducing agents, and other buffer components must be assessed. For example, the Bradford assay is highly sensitive to detergents, while the BCA assay offers better compatibility.
  • Required Sensitivity: For dilute samples, the highly sensitive Lowry or BCA methods may be preferred. For high-concentration samples, a less sensitive method like the Biuret method (often incorporated into Lowry/BCA) is sufficient.
  • Speed and Throughput: Bradford is the fastest colorimetric assay, making it suitable for high-throughput screening. The Kjeldahl method is slow, but modern, automated systems for Dumas combustion offer rapid nitrogen analysis.
  • Equipment Availability: UV-Vis spectrophotometers are widely available for UV absorbance, while specific plate readers and reagents are needed for colorimetric assays. The Kjeldahl and Dumas methods require more specialized and expensive equipment.

Conclusion

Multiple established methods exist for determining total protein, each with a unique principle, set of advantages, and limitations. For rapid, initial quantification of purified proteins, UV spectrophotometry is the most convenient. For mixed samples in most lab settings, the Bradford, Lowry, and BCA colorimetric assays offer varying degrees of speed, sensitivity, and compatibility with other reagents. When determining nitrogen content for food and agricultural applications, the gold-standard Kjeldahl method or the modern Dumas combustion technique is typically used. Accurate total protein determination requires careful consideration of the specific experimental context, including sample composition, desired sensitivity, and potential for interfering substances. For a deeper dive into modern assay options and optimization strategies, refer to Thermo Fisher Scientific's guide on protein assays: Overview of Protein Assays Methods | Thermo Fisher Scientific.


Frequently Asked Questions

The main difference lies in their chemical principles and performance characteristics. The Bradford assay uses a dye that binds to proteins under acidic conditions, causing a color shift, and is faster and simpler to perform. The Lowry method involves a two-step reaction of copper chelation followed by a reduction step, is more sensitive, but is also slower and more prone to interference from common lab reagents.

The UV absorbance method at 280 nm is not suitable for crude cell lysates because substances other than protein, such as nucleic acids, also absorb strongly at this wavelength. This interference leads to inaccurate and overestimated protein concentrations. It is best used for purified protein samples where interfering components are absent.

To choose the best method, consider your sample type (e.g., pure vs. complex), the presence of any interfering agents like detergents or reducing agents, the required sensitivity range, and the amount of sample available. For instance, if your sample contains detergents, the BCA assay is generally a better choice than the Bradford assay.

The BCA assay is based on two reactions. First, protein reduces $Cu^{2+}$ to $Cu^+$ under alkaline conditions. Second, the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) reagent chelates the cuprous ions, forming a purple-colored complex that absorbs light at 562 nm in proportion to the protein concentration.

No, a significant limitation of the Kjeldahl method is that it measures the total organic nitrogen content of a sample, which includes both protein and non-protein nitrogen (NPN) sources. Therefore, using the standard conversion factor can lead to an overestimation of the true protein content.

A standard curve is a graph plotting the absorbance values of a series of protein solutions with known, increasing concentrations. It is crucial for colorimetric assays because it provides a reference to accurately determine the concentration of unknown samples based on their measured absorbance. Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) is a commonly used standard.

Common sources of error include incorrect sample dilution, interference from buffer components or other chemicals, pipetting inaccuracies, variations in incubation times and temperatures, and the non-linearity of the standard curve at very high or low protein concentrations.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.