What is a METs score in nutrition?
At its core, a Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) score is a physiological measure expressing the energy cost of a physical activity. It represents the ratio of a person's working metabolic rate to their resting metabolic rate. One MET is defined as the energy expended while sitting quietly at rest. This foundational value serves as a benchmark against which the intensity of all other activities is measured. For example, an activity with a MET value of 4 requires four times the energy that the body uses at rest. In the context of nutrition, the METs score is the bridge that connects the food you eat (energy intake) with the activity you perform (energy expenditure), helping to balance the energy equation for various health goals.
The science behind the score
To appreciate the score fully, it's helpful to understand the underlying science. The energy your body uses comes from the oxygen you consume to fuel your cells. Scientifically, one MET is conventionally equated to an oxygen consumption of 3.5 milliliters per kilogram of body weight per minute (mL O2/kg/min).
While this standard value provides a convenient yardstick, it's important to remember it's an average derived from studies and may not perfectly reflect every individual due to factors like age, gender, and fitness level. Nevertheless, it remains a powerful tool for estimating energy usage. By knowing the MET value of an activity, nutrition and fitness professionals can estimate a client's calorie burn and, in turn, their corresponding nutritional needs.
How to calculate calories with METs
One of the most practical applications of a METs score is calculating the approximate calories burned during an activity. By combining the MET value with your body weight and the duration of the activity, you can get a useful estimate. The formula is as follows:
Calories burned per minute = (METs x 3.5 x Body Weight in kg) / 200
To illustrate with an example:
- A person weighing 160 pounds (approximately 73 kg) plays a game of singles tennis, which has a MET value of 8.
- The calculation would be: (8 x 3.5 x 73) / 200 = 10.2 calories per minute.
- If they play for an hour (60 minutes), the total calories burned would be 10.2 x 60 = 612 calories.
This simple calculation allows for a more personalized approach to diet and exercise planning than relying on generic calorie estimates.
How METs inform dietary planning
For nutrition professionals and individuals alike, understanding METs can fundamentally change how they approach dietary planning. Here’s how:
- Energy Balance: The primary principle of weight management is energy balance, which involves matching caloric intake with energy expenditure. By estimating a person's activity levels using METs, a dietitian can more accurately determine their Total Daily Energy Expenditure (TDEE). This helps create a customized diet plan for weight loss (consuming fewer calories than expended), weight gain (consuming more), or maintenance.
- Macronutrient Needs: The intensity of exercise, reflected in a higher METs score, influences the body's use of macronutrients. High-intensity activities rely more on carbohydrates for quick energy, while lower-intensity, longer-duration activities use more fat. A nutrition plan can be adjusted to prioritize the right macronutrients based on the typical MET levels of a person's activity.
- Goal Setting: Using METs allows for precise goal-setting. For example, a recommendation of 500 MET-minutes of activity per week translates to tangible actions. A person can choose to perform 100 minutes of 5-MET activity (e.g., brisk walking) or 50 minutes of 10-MET activity (e.g., running) to meet the same target.
Comparison of energy metrics
Understanding how METs compare to other energy metrics like Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) and Total Energy Expenditure (TEE) is essential for a complete nutritional picture.
| Feature | METs (Metabolic Equivalent of Task) | BMR (Basal Metabolic Rate) | TEE (Total Energy Expenditure) | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Ratio of working metabolic rate to resting metabolic rate. | Energy required for essential physiological functions at rest. | Total calories burned in a 24-hour period. | 
| Purpose | Measures activity intensity and estimates calories burned during exercise. | Foundation for all calorie calculations; represents energy cost of living. | Includes BMR, physical activity, and thermic effect of food. | 
| Calculation | Based on oxygen consumption during activity relative to rest. | Estimated using formulas (e.g., Mifflin-St Jeor) or lab testing. | Often calculated using a formula that multiplies BMR by a Physical Activity Level (PAL) factor. | 
| Usefulness | Helps tailor exercise intensity to dietary needs. | Provides a baseline for nutritional planning. | Offers a comprehensive view for weight management. | 
Activities and their MET levels
To make METs more concrete, the Compendium of Physical Activities provides a standardized list of MET values for a vast range of activities. This resource helps users understand the intensity of their daily tasks. Here are some examples:
- Light-Intensity (< 3.0 METs):
- Sitting at a desk: 1.3 METs
- Washing dishes: 2.2 METs
- Strolling at a slow pace: 2.0 METs
 
- Moderate-Intensity (3.0–6.0 METs):
- Brisk walking (3.5–4 mph): 5.0 METs
- General housework (sweeping): 3.5 METs
- Leisurely swimming laps: 6.0 METs
 
- Vigorous-Intensity (> 6.0 METs):
- Running (7 mph): 11.5 METs
- Singles tennis: 8.0 METs
- Competitive soccer: 10.0 METs
 
Limitations of the METs score
While a powerful tool, the METs score is not without limitations. It's a standardized estimate and does not perfectly account for every individual's unique physiology. Factors like body composition (ratio of fat to lean mass), age, fitness level, and environmental conditions can all influence actual energy expenditure. A brisk walk will require a different level of effort for a young athlete versus a sedentary older adult, though the standardized MET value remains the same. Therefore, while METs are excellent for general guidance, they should be used in conjunction with other personal health metrics for the most accurate and effective nutritional planning.
Conclusion
Understanding what is a METs score in nutrition offers a clear and practical method for quantifying the energy costs of physical activity. By providing a common language for discussing exercise intensity and calorie expenditure, METs empower individuals and professionals to create more precise and effective diet and fitness plans. While it is an estimate, incorporating METs into your nutrition strategy can provide a valuable framework for managing energy balance, personalizing macronutrient intake, and achieving your health goals more successfully.
An authoritative outbound link for further reading is the Compendium of Physical Activities website.