Skip to content

What bottle of wine has the least amount of calories?

4 min read

A standard 750 ml bottle of wine packs 600 to 700 calories, but not all bottles are created equal. Finding out what bottle of wine has the least amount of calories depends primarily on its alcohol by volume (ABV) and residual sugar content.

Quick Summary

The bottle of wine with the fewest calories is typically a dry, low-alcohol sparkling or still white wine. Non-alcoholic options contain the absolute lowest calories for those seeking minimal caloric intake.

Key Points

  • Alcohol is the Key: Alcohol by Volume (ABV) is the primary determinant of a wine's calorie count, with higher ABV meaning more calories.

  • Dry is Better: Dry wines have less residual sugar than sweet wines, resulting in fewer calories per serving.

  • Sparkling is Low: Dry sparkling wines like Brut Nature or Extra Brut Champagne are among the lowest-calorie alcoholic options.

  • Low-Calorie Grapes: Lighter-bodied still wines from grapes like Sauvignon Blanc, Pinot Grigio, and Pinot Noir are reliable low-calorie choices.

  • Non-Alcoholic is King: For the absolute minimum calories in a bottle, a non-alcoholic wine is the best option.

  • Read the Label: Check for low ABV (under 12.5%) and 'Dry' or 'Brut' indicators to find a healthier bottle.

In This Article

The Primary Factors Influencing Wine Calories

For those wondering what bottle of wine has the least amount of calories, the answer lies in two key factors: alcohol content and residual sugar. These two components are the main sources of energy in wine. Knowing how they affect the final product is the first step toward making more mindful choices.

Alcohol by Volume (ABV)

Alcohol is a significant source of calories, providing approximately 7 calories per gram. This means that the higher the ABV, the higher the wine's calorie count. This is a crucial metric to check when comparing different bottles. Wines with lower ABVs, typically under 12.5%, will naturally have fewer calories than those with higher percentages, which can reach 15% or more.

Residual Sugar (RS)

Residual sugar is the unfermented grape sugar remaining in the wine after fermentation. While alcohol contributes the most calories, residual sugar adds to the total. Dry wines have little to no residual sugar, while sweet and fortified wines have much higher levels. For example, dessert wines like Port have both high ABV and high residual sugar, making them the most calorically dense wine type. Conversely, a very dry wine with a lower ABV will be one of your lowest-calorie options.

Low-Calorie Wine Options by Type

To pinpoint the lowest-calorie bottle, it's helpful to explore different wine types. Your best bets for the fewest calories will typically be dry sparkling wines and still white wines, followed by lighter-bodied reds.

Sparkling Wines

Sparkling wines are often a great choice for those watching their calories due to their typically lower alcohol content. The driest styles are the best options.

  • Brut Nature or Brut Zero: These are the driest sparkling wines, with no added sugar (dosage), and often have the fewest calories, around 90-100 per 5 oz glass.
  • Extra Brut: Also very dry, these are another excellent low-calorie option.
  • Prosecco Brut: Lighter in alcohol than many Champagnes, Prosecco Brut is a popular, low-calorie pick.

White Wines

For still white wines, dryness and ABV are key. Some of the lightest, driest white varieties include:

  • Sauvignon Blanc: Often light, crisp, and refreshing with a relatively low ABV, typically between 110-115 calories per 5 oz serving.
  • Pinot Grigio: A crisp, dry white that is reliably low in calories, usually around 112-120 per 5 oz glass.
  • Vinho Verde: A Portuguese wine that is characteristically low in alcohol and calories.

Red Wines

While red wines generally have slightly more calories than whites due to higher ABVs, there are lighter-bodied, lower-calorie red options available.

  • Pinot Noir: This light-bodied red is a favorite for calorie counters, often containing around 120 calories per 5 oz glass.
  • Gamay (Beaujolais): A fruity, light red with a low-to-moderate ABV, offering a flavorful, low-calorie alternative.
  • Barbera: An Italian red with bright acidity and a moderate calorie count.

Non-Alcoholic Wine

For the absolute fewest calories, non-alcoholic wine is the winner. After the alcohol is removed, the calorie count plummets. A 5-ounce glass can contain as little as 9-15 calories. While some non-alcoholic wines have added sugar to compensate for flavor, they still represent the lowest caloric choice. Check the label to be sure.

How to Find a Low-Calorie Bottle

When you're shopping, follow these simple steps to make the best choice:

  • Check the ABV: The alcohol content is the single most important indicator of calories. Look for wines with an ABV of 12.5% or lower.
  • Look for 'Dry': The term 'Brut,' 'Brut Nature,' or 'Sec' on sparkling wines indicates a dry style with low residual sugar. For still wines, look for descriptors like 'Dry' or research the varietal to understand its sweetness level.
  • Consider the Climate: Wines from cooler climates generally have less sugar and lower alcohol due to less ripeness in the grapes. Look for wines from Germany, Northern Italy, or Oregon.
  • Beware of Sweet Wines: Avoid anything labeled 'Late Harvest,' 'Dessert Wine,' or 'Fortified' (like Port or Sherry), as these are designed to be sweet and are very high in calories.

Low-Calorie Wine Comparison Table

Wine Type Style/Varietal Typical ABV Calories per 5 oz glass
Sparkling Brut Nature ~12.0% 90-100
Sparkling Extra Brut ~12.0% 100-105
White Sauvignon Blanc 9-13% 110-115
White Pinot Grigio 9-13% 112-120
White Vinho Verde ~10.0% ~88
Red Pinot Noir 11-13.5% 115-125
Red Gamay (Beaujolais) 11-13.5% 115-120

Conclusion: Which Bottle is Best for You?

When looking for the bottle of wine that has the least amount of calories, the best approach is to choose a dry, low-alcohol wine, particularly a sparkling one like Brut Nature Champagne or a still white like Vinho Verde. Non-alcoholic versions are the lowest-calorie option of all. Remember, the true calorie culprit is often the alcohol content, so checking the ABV on the label is your most effective tool. By understanding the factors at play, you can confidently choose a lighter, more mindful option to enjoy.

For more detailed information on wine nutrition and variety, check out Wine Folly's guide on discerning low-calorie wines.

Frequently Asked Questions

A bottle of non-alcoholic wine will have the fewest calories, as most of a wine's calories come from alcohol. For alcoholic options, a bottle of dry sparkling wine (like Brut Nature Champagne) or a very dry white wine with a low ABV (like Vinho Verde) has the least amount of calories.

The calorie count in a bottle of wine is determined primarily by its alcohol content (ABV) and its residual sugar (RS). Wines with higher ABV and more residual sugar will have a higher caloric value.

On average, red wines can have slightly more calories than white wines because they often have a higher alcohol content. However, the difference is often marginal, and a dry, high-ABV white can have more calories than a lighter-bodied red.

Good low-calorie white wines include Sauvignon Blanc, Pinot Grigio, and Albariño. For an even lighter option, look for a crisp Vinho Verde.

Good low-calorie red wines include lighter-bodied varieties such as Pinot Noir and Gamay (often sold as Beaujolais).

Non-alcoholic wines contain significantly fewer calories than their alcoholic counterparts. A glass of non-alcoholic wine can have as few as 9-15 calories, compared to over 100 in a standard alcoholic glass.

A standard 750ml bottle of wine contains approximately five 5-ounce servings. To estimate, multiply the ABV percentage by 5 and then by 1.6 to get the alcohol calories per glass, and multiply that by 5 for the bottle. Remember to also account for residual sugar in sweeter wines.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.