Skip to content

What Country Has the Highest Food Insecurity?

4 min read

As of recent reports, several countries are facing severe food crises, with Sudan and the Gaza Strip being identified as having confirmed famine conditions in 2025. Conflict, economic shocks, and climate extremes are the primary drivers exacerbating the global issue of food insecurity.

Quick Summary

Several reports highlight the worst food crises, with hotspots like Sudan, the Gaza Strip, and the Democratic Republic of Congo identified. Conflict, economic instability, and climate change are primary drivers, affecting millions worldwide. Humanitarian efforts face significant funding challenges, leaving many vulnerable populations without assistance.

Key Points

  • Sudan and Gaza Strip face famine: Famine was confirmed in parts of Sudan and the Gaza Strip in 2025 due to conflict and access restrictions, signifying catastrophic levels of food insecurity.

  • Top countries by numbers affected: Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and Sudan consistently report the highest total number of people facing acute food insecurity.

  • Primary drivers of hunger: Conflict, economic shocks (like high inflation), and climate extremes are the main factors causing food insecurity across the globe.

  • Funding shortfalls are a major issue: Humanitarian organizations face critical funding gaps, which have led to a reduction in aid and an increase in the number of people without assistance.

  • A multi-faceted response is needed: Addressing food insecurity requires both immediate emergency relief and long-term strategies, including conflict resolution, climate resilience, and sustainable development investments.

In This Article

The Global Landscape of Food Insecurity

Food insecurity is a global crisis, but its impact is felt most acutely in specific regions grappling with conflict, climate shocks, and economic collapse. Recent reports from the UN World Food Programme (WFP), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) provide a sobering picture of the worst-affected areas. While the situation is fluid, with different countries topping lists based on the specific metrics used (e.g., total number of people versus percentage of population), a few hotspots consistently appear at the highest levels of concern. In 2025, famine was confirmed in parts of Sudan and the Gaza Strip, signaling an extreme crisis.

The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) is a key tool used by humanitarian agencies to assess the severity of food insecurity, rating it on a five-phase scale where Phase 5 indicates catastrophe or famine. The most recent data reveals that millions are in the grips of acute food insecurity, defined as the inability to access adequate food in the short term, putting lives and livelihoods at immediate risk.

Leading Countries Facing Acute Food Insecurity

While the answer to "what country has the highest food insecurity?" depends on the metric, a few nations consistently face the most severe and widespread crises. Here is a breakdown based on recent reports:

  • Sudan: In 2025, famine was officially confirmed in Sudan, primarily affecting internally displaced persons (IDPs) and conflict zones. Ongoing conflict has severely restricted humanitarian access, destroyed livelihoods, and triggered a major displacement crisis, with 24.6 million people facing high levels of acute food insecurity.
  • Gaza Strip: By September 2025, reports indicated that the entire population of Gaza was projected to face high levels of acute food insecurity. Escalating conflict and blockades have crippled aid delivery, leaving over half a million people on the brink of starvation.
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC): The DRC has one of the highest total numbers of people in acute food insecurity, with 27.7 million people affected in 2025. Decades of conflict, displacement, and economic volatility have eroded people's resilience and capacity to produce or purchase food.
  • Nigeria: With 30.6 million people facing acute food shortages, Nigeria continues to be one of the hardest-hit countries in Africa. Insecurity, economic shocks, and the removal of fuel subsidies have caused food prices to soar, limiting purchasing power for millions.
  • Yemen: A decade of conflict and economic decline has pushed Yemen into one of the world's most severe food crises. In 2025, over 18 million people, nearly two-thirds of the population, were struggling with hunger. High food prices, coupled with funding shortfalls for humanitarian aid, have exacerbated the crisis.
  • Afghanistan: A combination of climate shocks, economic collapse, and reduced international aid has worsened the food security situation in Afghanistan. Recent reports estimate that approximately 15 million people are facing severe food insecurity, with women and children disproportionately affected.

Primary Causes and Contributing Factors

The food crises gripping these nations are not isolated events but the result of a complex interplay of factors.

Comparison of Key Drivers in Food Crisis Hotspots

Driver Sudan Gaza Strip Democratic Republic of Congo Yemen Afghanistan
Conflict/Insecurity Primary driver Primary driver Major driver Primary driver Significant driver
Economic Shocks High inflation Blockades Endemic poverty Economic crisis Economic collapse
Climate Extremes Flooding Not a primary driver Flooding, pests Drought Drought, floods
Humanitarian Access Severely restricted Restricted Hindered Limited Affected by cuts

Humanitarian Response and Challenges

Humanitarian organizations like the WFP and FAO are on the front lines, providing critical food and nutrition assistance. In Yemen, WFP supplies much of the logistical capacity for aid delivery, providing food assistance that has been instrumental in preventing famine in some areas. The World Bank is also involved, funding projects like the Afghanistan Emergency Food Security Project (EFSP) to boost local food production and resilience. In South Sudan, the WFP has scaled up operations to assist millions affected by conflict and flooding.

Despite these efforts, humanitarian responses face significant challenges. Severe funding shortfalls have forced organizations to scale back operations and reduce food rations. For example, a 17% drop in official development assistance was projected for 2025, severely impacting food security and nutrition programs. Unrestricted access to conflict-affected areas is also a constant challenge, hampering aid delivery and leaving some of the most vulnerable people unassisted.

What Can Be Done to Address Food Insecurity?

A multi-pronged approach is essential for addressing food insecurity effectively. It requires both immediate emergency relief and long-term, sustainable solutions.

Key Strategies

  • Emergency Aid: Provide urgent and adequate humanitarian assistance to countries facing famine or catastrophic levels of food insecurity. Organizations need increased and consistent funding to maintain life-saving interventions.
  • Conflict Resolution: Address the root causes of conflict and political instability, which are the primary drivers of hunger in many hotspots. Brokering political solutions is crucial for enabling aid access and rebuilding food systems.
  • Climate Resilience: Invest in climate adaptation strategies, such as drought-resistant crops, improved irrigation, and early warning systems, to mitigate the impacts of extreme weather events on agriculture.
  • Economic Support: Implement effective social protection measures and support local economies to increase household purchasing power and reduce dependency on aid.
  • Sustainable Development: Fund long-term investments in agriculture, rural development, and health and education systems to build resilience and reduce vulnerability to future shocks.

Conclusion

Identifying what country has the highest food insecurity is complex, but reports highlight Sudan, Gaza, DRC, Nigeria, Yemen, and Afghanistan as current epicenters of the crisis. Conflict remains the deadliest driver, pushing millions to the brink of starvation, while economic collapse and climate change exacerbate the situation. The global response, while vital, is currently hampered by funding shortfalls and access constraints. Long-term resilience depends on a coordinated global effort to address the root causes of conflict, invest in sustainable food systems, and ensure consistent humanitarian support for the world's most vulnerable populations.

Frequently Asked Questions

As of September 2025, the Gaza Strip faced the most extreme food insecurity, with the entire population projected to be at high levels of acute food insecurity, including catastrophic levels for many.

The main causes of global food insecurity include conflict and insecurity, economic shocks (like high food prices and inflation), climate extremes (such as droughts and floods), and lack of humanitarian access.

According to the 2025 Global Report on Food Crises, approximately 295 million people are facing high levels of acute food insecurity.

Nigeria has one of the highest numbers of people in acute food insecurity, with 30.6 million people affected in 2025, according to recent reports.

Climate change exacerbates food insecurity through unpredictable weather patterns, droughts, floods, and temperature extremes, which destroy crops, disrupt supply chains, and increase food prices.

The IPC is a tool used by humanitarian organizations to classify the severity of food insecurity on a five-phase scale, where Phase 5 indicates catastrophe or famine.

Organizations like the WFP and FAO provide emergency food and nutrition aid, logistics support, and long-term development programs, but their efforts are hampered by significant funding shortfalls.

Several factors contribute to declining humanitarian funding, including the increasing number of global crises and overall funding fatigue, as noted in reports highlighting significant funding shortfalls projected for 2025.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.