Skip to content

What have they done to Kellogg's All-Bran? The 2025 Recipe Change Explained

4 min read

In July 2025, Kellanova, the company owning the Kellogg's brand, announced a significant production change for its All-Bran cereal, leading to widespread backlash. The subsequent recipe update has left countless loyal customers asking, "what have they done to Kellogg's All-Bran?", as many report the once-reliable breakfast staple is now tasteless and unsatisfying.

Quick Summary

The classic Kellogg's All-Bran cereal underwent a major recipe and production shift by Kellanova in 2025, resulting in widespread consumer disapproval over its altered taste, texture, and eating experience. The company cites sustainability and waste reduction as the rationale, but many longtime buyers lament the inferior quality and flavor of the new product, with some moving to alternative brands.

Key Points

  • Recipe Changed: Kellanova, formerly Kellogg Company, reformulated All-Bran in 2025, changing its classic formula for efficiency and sustainability.

  • Negative Consumer Feedback: Loyal customers have widely criticized the new recipe for its bland taste, harder texture, and failure to soften in milk.

  • Production Streamlined: The change was implemented after a factory upgrade in Wrexham, UK, utilizing new technology to reduce energy usage and food waste from broken flakes.

  • Market Impact: The change primarily affects the UK and other international markets, though North American customers have also reported differences in other All-Bran products.

  • Brand Perception Damaged: The recipe change has led to a significant drop in consumer trust and loyalty, with many long-time buyers switching to alternative brands.

  • Inconsistent Claims: Despite Kellanova claiming extensive testing proved customers loved the new taste, public feedback and reviews overwhelmingly suggest the opposite.

In This Article

The Kellanova Rebrand and its Impact on Cereal

The story of the All-Bran change begins with a significant corporate restructuring. In October 2023, the former Kellogg Company officially split into two separate entities: WK Kellogg Co, responsible for the North American cereal business, and Kellanova, which took over global snacking and international cereal brands. This major rebrand set the stage for subsequent changes to iconic products like All-Bran in various markets, particularly in the UK and Europe.

Shortly after the split, Kellanova announced a £75m investment in its Wrexham factory in North Wales, home to All-Bran production since 1978. The company stated that new technology would be introduced to streamline production, reduce energy usage, and decrease food waste from broken cereal pieces. While Kellanova framed these changes as positive, highlighting sustainability and a better-looking product with less "dust" in the box, consumers soon discovered that the environmental gains came at a significant cost to the cereal's taste and texture.

The Consumer Uprising: Why Are Customers So Angry?

Within weeks of the new All-Bran Fibre Plus hitting shelves in the UK in mid-2025, consumer forums, social media, and retailer review pages were flooded with negative feedback. The primary complaints centered on a dramatic shift in the sensory experience of the cereal.

  • Flavorless Formula: Many customers found the new cereal to be bland and tasteless, a stark contrast to the familiar, wheaty flavour of the original. One Tesco customer review described the new version as having the "taste of cardboard".
  • Unpleasant Texture: The new production process resulted in a crunchier, harder shred that reportedly does not soften properly in milk. Reviewers on platforms like Tesco and Facebook likened the texture to "tasteless twigs" and "rubbery, hard worms".
  • Disintegration of Brand Loyalty: For many consumers, All-Bran was a daily staple, trusted for its high-fiber benefits and consistent quality. The sudden and significant change has led many to vow to abandon the brand entirely.
  • Perceived Misleading Statements: Kellanova claimed that consumer testing showed people loved the new taste, a statement many angered customers flatly contradicted. This has fueled a sense of mistrust towards the company's communication regarding the change.

Old All-Bran vs. New All-Bran Fibre Plus: A Comparison

Feature Old All-Bran Original (Pre-2025) New All-Bran Fibre Plus (Post-2025)
Flavor Rich, wheaty, and familiar Described as bland, tasteless, and cardboard-like.
Texture Softer, absorbent shreds that would mush in milk; produced some "dust" Lighter, harder, crunchier shreds that hold their shape; resistant to softening.
Manufacturing Produced using older, traditional methods in a less energy-efficient process Made with new, advanced technology to speed production and reduce energy use.
Sustainability Less emphasis on modern sustainability metrics Designed to reduce food waste and factory energy consumption.
Dust in Box Yes, some broken flakes or "dust" was common Claimed to have fewer breakages and less dust.
Consumer Reaction Highly positive, with a fiercely loyal customer base Overwhelmingly negative, leading to customer churn and strong online condemnation.

The Ripple Effect: How Changes Affect Other Markets

The restructuring of the company into Kellanova and WK Kellogg Co raises questions about similar reformulations in other regions. While the most vocal backlash has been concentrated in the UK regarding the All-Bran Fibre Plus variant, consumers in the North American market served by WK Kellogg Co have also reported changes and availability issues. Some US customers on WK Kellogg's own product pages complained of a different texture and flavor following what appears to be a change related to new machinery, and some have even reported being unable to find the classic version. This suggests that the cost-saving and efficiency-driven motivations behind the UK change may be part of a broader corporate strategy impacting cereal products worldwide.

For lifelong All-Bran fans, this is more than just a recipe change; it represents the loss of a trusted, nostalgic product. The frustration highlights the deep connection consumers have with traditional, long-standing brands and the risk companies take when altering a beloved formula. Companies like Kellanova often prioritize production efficiencies and sustainability, but the episode with All-Bran shows that if it comes at the expense of quality, consumers will not hesitate to voice their discontent and seek alternatives.

Finding a Suitable All-Bran Alternative

For those disillusioned with the new recipe, finding a replacement is the next step. A good alternative should offer a similar nutritional profile and, ideally, a closer taste and texture to the original.

  • Generic Store Brands: Many grocery stores offer their own high-fiber bran cereals. These can sometimes mimic the flavour and texture of the original, pre-2025 All-Bran. Customers reporting disappointment with the new version have noted that some store-brand alternatives are now superior.
  • Bran Flakes: For those specifically seeking a high-fiber option with a traditional flake texture, many competitors still offer classic bran flakes. Some disappointed All-Bran customers have already switched to this alternative.
  • Pure Wheat Bran: A more DIY approach involves purchasing raw wheat bran and adding it to other cereals, yogurts, or baked goods. This allows for precise control over the texture and fiber content.
  • Bran Buds or Other All-Bran Variants: While some customers have reported issues with other All-Bran products, some might find solace in the "Buds" version if still available and unchanged in their region.

Conclusion: The Final Verdict on All-Bran's Evolution

The changes to Kellogg's All-Bran represent a clear case of a corporation prioritizing production efficiency and sustainability over product consistency and consumer satisfaction. The shift to a faster, more automated manufacturing process by Kellanova in 2025 has irrevocably altered the taste and texture of a decades-old product, alienating a deeply loyal customer base. While Kellanova stands by its decision, the widespread negative feedback suggests the company misjudged the importance of All-Bran's original qualities to its consumers. The result is a diminished product and a search for a new, dependable high-fiber cereal for many disillusioned shoppers. The company's press release on the launch of the new product can be viewed here: Kellanova begins production of new All-Bran Fibre Plus.

Frequently Asked Questions

Kellanova, the company that owns Kellogg's, began producing a new recipe for All-Bran in mid-2025 following a factory investment and upgrade.

Kellanova is the corporate entity that emerged from the 2023 split of the former Kellogg Company. It oversees the international cereal and global snacking divisions, while WK Kellogg Co manages the North American cereal market.

The company stated the change was made to increase production efficiency, reduce energy use, and minimize food waste from broken cereal pieces during manufacturing.

According to many customers, the new version has a much harder, crunchier texture and is tasteless and bland. Unlike the original, it reportedly does not soften well when milk is added.

Kellanova claims they tested the new recipe extensively with consumers who loved the taste. However, widespread negative reviews from long-time customers challenge this assertion.

The company maintains that the new All-Bran Fibre Plus still delivers a high fiber content, providing more than 1/3 of the daily recommended intake per serving.

Some alternatives include store-brand high-fiber cereals, classic Bran Flakes, or adding pure wheat bran to other foods. Some customers have also noted that private-label products are now superior to the reformulated All-Bran.

Reviews from customers on WK Kellogg Co's US product site suggest changes have also been made to the US All-Bran products, with consumers reporting taste and texture differences following new machinery installation.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.