Skip to content

What is healthier, beef or lamb?

4 min read

While both lamb and beef are nutritionally dense red meats, research shows that grass-fed lamb contains significantly higher levels of heart-healthy omega-3s and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) compared to beef. This nutrient profile difference is a key factor in determining what is healthier, beef or lamb, but the answer also depends heavily on the specific cut and how the animal was raised.

Quick Summary

This article compares the nutritional profiles of beef and lamb, examining key differences in protein, fat content, and essential micronutrients. It provides a detailed breakdown to help inform dietary choices, considering factors like grass-fed versus grain-fed and the impact of various cuts on overall health.

Key Points

  • Fat Profile: Grass-fed lamb typically has more heart-healthy omega-3s and CLA than beef, making it beneficial for heart and metabolic health.

  • Calories and Lean Cuts: Lean beef cuts generally have fewer calories and less fat, making them a better choice for weight loss and low-calorie diets.

  • Micronutrient Differences: Beef is a richer source of zinc, while lamb provides more selenium and copper, so including both can provide a broader range of nutrients.

  • Impact of Diet: Whether the animal was grass-fed or grain-fed is a crucial factor, influencing fat composition and overall nutritional value for both meats.

  • Cooking Matters: Health benefits can be maximized by choosing healthy cooking methods like grilling or roasting and trimming excess fat.

  • Protein Quality: While beef has slightly more protein per serving, lamb offers a richer profile of essential amino acids.

In This Article

Comparing the Nutritional Powerhouses

Both beef and lamb are prized as excellent sources of high-quality protein, essential amino acids, and vital nutrients like B vitamins, iron, and zinc. However, a closer look at their macronutrient and micronutrient compositions reveals several important differences that can influence which is the better choice for your specific health needs.

Macronutrient and Calorie Breakdown

On average, lamb tends to be higher in both calories and fat than many common cuts of beef. For example, a 100g serving of cooked lamb can have more calories than a comparable serving of cooked beef, though this can reverse for certain lean cuts. Lean beef, like a tenderloin cut, is often the winner for those on a calorie-restricted or low-fat diet. However, lamb's higher fat content can be beneficial for individuals following high-fat, low-carb diets like keto, as it offers greater satiety.

  • Protein: Beef generally has a slightly higher total protein content per 100g. For example, a 100g serving of beef might contain around 25.93g of protein, while the same amount of lamb offers about 24.52g. Despite this, lamb is noted for having a richer profile of essential amino acids.
  • Fat: This is where the most significant difference lies. Lamb typically contains more total fat, especially saturated and polyunsaturated fats. The fat profile is heavily influenced by how the animal was raised, with grass-fed animals of both types having a healthier fatty acid composition than grain-fed ones.

Micronutrients and Special Compounds

Beyond the basic macronutrients, lamb and beef offer unique micronutrient benefits. A standout difference is in the fatty acid profiles of grass-fed versions.

  • Omega-3s: Grass-fed lamb is a superior source of omega-3 fatty acids, often containing substantially more than even grass-fed beef. These fatty acids are well-known for their anti-inflammatory properties and benefits for heart and brain health. Some farmers even refer to grass-fed lamb as "land salmon" due to its rich omega-3 content.
  • Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA): Lamb contains higher concentrations of CLA, a beneficial fatty acid linked to weight loss and improved body composition. While beef also contains CLA, lamb has been found to be the richest meat source.
  • Vitamins and Minerals: While both meats are rich in B vitamins and key minerals, there are subtle variations. Beef generally contains higher levels of zinc, while lamb is a better source of selenium. Beef also boasts more vitamin B6, while lamb contains more folate, vitamin K, and copper.

The Role of Farming and Cuts

How an animal is raised and the specific cut of meat you choose are crucial factors that can outweigh species differences. Grass-fed beef and lamb are widely considered healthier options due to their superior fatty acid profiles, containing higher levels of omega-3s and other beneficial compounds compared to grain-fed versions. For instance, a lean, grass-fed beef cut may be leaner than a fatty, grain-fed lamb cut. Similarly, a lean cut of lamb like a leg fillet might have fewer calories and fat than a marbled ribeye steak.

To make the healthiest choice, always consider the source of your meat and the cut. Opting for leaner cuts like lamb leg or beef sirloin and choosing grass-fed whenever possible will ensure you are maximizing the nutritional benefits.

Which Is Healthier? Beef vs. Lamb at a Glance

Feature Beef Lamb
Protein Content Slightly higher total protein (per 100g average) Slightly lower total protein, but richer in essential amino acids
Calorie Count Often lower in calories, especially lean cuts Typically higher in calories, more energy-dense
Fat Profile Can be very lean; grass-fed has good fat composition Higher in fat; grass-fed is rich in omega-3s and CLA
Omega-3s (Grass-fed) Lower content compared to grass-fed lamb Significantly higher content, excellent source
CLA Content Good source, but less than lamb Richest meat source of CLA
Zinc Content Higher levels of zinc Higher levels of selenium and copper
Best for Weight Loss Leaner cuts are often better for strict calorie counting Higher fat content promotes satiety, helpful on low-carb diets
Flavor Mild and versatile Bolder, more earthy flavor

The Final Verdict on Health

So, what is healthier, beef or lamb? The answer is nuanced. For those seeking lean protein with lower calories and fat, a lean cut of grass-fed beef is often the better choice. For individuals prioritizing healthy fats like omega-3s and CLA, and following a high-fat diet, grass-fed lamb is the superior option. The ultimate decision should be based on your personal dietary goals, taste preferences, and the quality of the meat available. Incorporating a variety of both meats into a balanced diet is a smart approach for maximizing nutritional intake. To learn more about sustainable farming and its health benefits, explore resources from organizations like the American Grassfed Association.

Cooking Methods Matter

Regardless of which meat you choose, the way you prepare it significantly impacts its nutritional value. Cooking methods such as grilling, roasting, or pan-frying with minimal oil are generally healthier options. Trimming visible fat before cooking can also reduce the overall fat and calorie content. Conversely, deep-frying can drastically increase the fat and calorie count. Furthermore, long cooking times and high temperatures can affect certain nutrient levels, so it is important to balance cooking with nutrient preservation.

Conclusion: A Balanced Approach to Choosing Red Meat

Both beef and lamb are valuable components of a nutritious diet, providing essential protein, vitamins, and minerals. Lamb stands out for its higher content of omega-3s and CLA, particularly when grass-fed, which is beneficial for heart health and metabolism. Beef, especially in its leaner cuts, offers a lower-fat, lower-calorie alternative that is ideal for weight management. The healthfulness of either option is not a simple choice but depends on the cut, the animal's diet (grass-fed vs. grain-fed), and the cooking method. The best strategy is often to enjoy both in moderation, prioritizing high-quality, lean cuts to reap the unique benefits each has to offer while maintaining a balanced diet.

Frequently Asked Questions

Grass-fed lamb is generally considered healthier due to its higher levels of omega-3 fatty acids and CLA. However, both grass-fed versions are superior to their grain-fed counterparts in nutritional quality.

For low-calorie and low-fat diets aimed at weight loss, leaner cuts of beef are often the better option. Lamb's higher fat content can increase satiety, which is beneficial for managing appetite on a low-carb diet.

Beef typically contains a slightly higher total protein content per 100g serving. However, lamb is noted for having a richer profile of essential amino acids.

Grass-fed lamb has a more beneficial fatty acid profile, with significantly higher omega-3 content than beef. It is also the richest meat source of CLA.

Yes, cooking methods impact nutritional value. Grilling and roasting are generally healthier, while deep-frying adds calories. Some nutrients can be lost during cooking, particularly water-soluble vitamins.

Some people find lamb easier to digest than beef. This may be due to it coming from younger sheep, resulting in more tender meat.

CLA, or conjugated linoleic acid, is a fatty acid found naturally in ruminant meat. It has been linked to health benefits such as reduced body fat and improved immune function, and lamb contains the highest amounts.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.