Skip to content

What is the difference between enteral feeding and parenteral feeding?

4 min read

According to a study published in the journal Critical Care, enteral nutrition is often the preferred route for early nutrition therapy in critically ill adults over parenteral nutrition. Understanding the difference between enteral feeding and parenteral feeding is vital for both healthcare professionals and patients.

Quick Summary

This article explains the core differences between enteral and parenteral feeding, covering administration routes, indications, associated risks, and costs. Compare these nutritional support methods for informed healthcare decisions.

Key Points

  • Route of Delivery: Enteral feeding uses the gastrointestinal (GI) tract via a tube, whereas parenteral feeding bypasses the GI tract, delivering nutrients intravenously.

  • Gut Function: Enteral feeding requires a functional gut and is preferred when possible, while parenteral feeding is necessary when the GI tract is non-functional.

  • Infection Risk: Parenteral feeding carries a higher risk of serious bloodstream infections compared to enteral feeding.

  • Cost and Complexity: Enteral feeding is generally less expensive and simpler to administer, whereas parenteral feeding requires more complex preparation and monitoring.

  • Physiological Benefits: Enteral feeding supports gut integrity and immune function, mimicking the body's natural digestive process.

  • Indications: Common reasons for enteral feeding include difficulty swallowing (dysphagia) or critical illness, while parenteral is for conditions like bowel obstruction or severe malabsorption.

In This Article

The administration of nutritional support is a critical component of medical care for patients who cannot consume enough food orally. Depending on the patient's condition, the feeding method can be either enteral or parenteral. The primary distinction lies in the route of nutrient delivery: enteral feeding uses the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, while parenteral feeding bypasses it entirely, delivering nutrients directly into the bloodstream.

What is Enteral Feeding?

Enteral feeding, often referred to as tube feeding, uses the GI tract to provide nourishment. It is the preferred method when the gut is functional but a patient cannot safely eat or swallow sufficient nutrients. A variety of tubes are used for delivery, each chosen based on the anticipated duration of feeding and the patient's specific needs.

Common Types of Enteral Tubes:

  • Nasogastric (NG) tube: A tube inserted through the nose into the stomach, used for short-term feeding.
  • Nasojejunal (NJ) tube: Placed through the nose and advanced into the jejunum (part of the small intestine), ideal for patients with gastric reflux or poor stomach emptying.
  • Gastrostomy (G-tube): A tube surgically placed directly into the stomach through the abdominal wall, used for long-term feeding.
  • Jejunostomy (J-tube): A tube surgically placed directly into the small intestine, for patients who cannot tolerate stomach feeding.

Administration Methods for Enteral Feeds:

  • Bolus feeding: Large amounts of formula are delivered several times a day, mimicking meal patterns.
  • Continuous feeding: A slow, continuous drip of formula delivered over 24 hours, often via a feeding pump.
  • Cyclic feeding: A continuous infusion delivered over a shorter period, such as overnight.

What is Parenteral Feeding?

Parenteral feeding, also known as intravenous (IV) feeding, delivers a nutrient-rich solution directly into the bloodstream, completely bypassing the digestive system. This method is necessary when the GI tract is not functional due to a disease, obstruction, or other conditions. The nutrient solution, known as total parenteral nutrition (TPN) for complete nutritional needs or partial parenteral nutrition (PPN) for supplementary support, contains a custom mixture of essential components.

Parenteral Nutrition Solutions Typically Contain:

  • Dextrose: Provides carbohydrates and calories.
  • Amino Acids: Supply the body with protein.
  • Lipids: Offer essential fatty acids and calories.
  • Vitamins, Minerals, and Electrolytes: Address micronutrient needs.

Types of Intravenous Access for Parenteral Feeding:

  • Central IV access: A catheter is placed into a large, central vein (like the superior vena cava) for long-term or high-concentration feeding (TPN).
  • Peripheral IV access: A catheter is inserted into a smaller peripheral vein in the arm or hand for short-term, less concentrated feeding (PPN).

Comparison Table: Enteral vs. Parenteral Feeding

Feature Enteral Feeding Parenteral Feeding
Administration Route Via the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (mouth, nose, or surgically placed tube). Directly into the bloodstream via an intravenous (IV) catheter.
Indications Functional GI tract but inability to eat or swallow safely due to neurological disorders, cancer, or critical illness. Non-functional or impaired GI tract, severe malabsorption, intestinal obstruction, or conditions requiring bowel rest.
Physiological Impact More physiological, supports gut integrity, stimulates gut hormones, and preserves gut microbiota. Bypasses the GI system entirely, can lead to gut atrophy over time.
Cost Less expensive due to lower preparation costs and less intensive monitoring requirements. Significantly more expensive due to complex solution preparation and higher monitoring needs.
Equipment Feeding tube, feeding pump (optional), and formula. IV catheter, IV pump, and specialized nutrient solution (TPN/PPN).
Infection Risk Generally lower risk of serious systemic infection. Higher risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections due to direct venous access.
Metabolic Risks Risk of refeeding syndrome and electrolyte imbalances, particularly in malnourished patients. Higher risk of severe metabolic complications like hyperglycemia and liver dysfunction.

Making the Right Choice

The decision between enteral and parenteral feeding is made by a multidisciplinary healthcare team based on a thorough assessment of the patient's condition. While parenteral nutrition is a life-saving option for patients with non-functional GI tracts, enteral nutrition is almost always the preferred option when the gut is working. This preference stems from enteral feeding's lower cost, reduced risk of infection, and ability to maintain gut function, which is crucial for immune health. The transition between methods is often gradual, with many patients moving from parenteral to enteral as their condition improves.

How to Manage Care at Home

For patients requiring long-term nutritional support at home, managing either feeding method requires careful training and adherence to safety protocols. Family caregivers receive instruction on how to administer feeds, care for the access site, and identify potential complications. In both scenarios, regular communication with the medical team, including nutritionists, is vital for monitoring patient progress and adjusting formulas as needed. For managing tube feeding at home, an authoritative resource can be found via the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the fundamental difference between enteral and parenteral feeding is the route of nutrient delivery—the GI tract versus the bloodstream, respectively. This single difference dictates everything from the method of administration to the associated risks and overall physiological impact. While enteral feeding is the favored approach for patients with a functional gut due to its numerous benefits, parenteral feeding remains an essential and life-sustaining intervention for those unable to use their digestive system. The appropriate choice of nutritional support is tailored to each patient's unique medical situation, ensuring they receive the best possible care.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary difference is the route of administration. Enteral feeding delivers nutrients into the gastrointestinal (GI) tract via a feeding tube, while parenteral feeding delivers nutrients directly into the bloodstream through an intravenous (IV) line.

Enteral feeding is the preferred option when the patient's gastrointestinal tract is functional but they cannot consume enough calories and nutrients orally, often due to conditions like stroke, head and neck cancers, or critical illness.

Parenteral feeding is necessary when the patient's gastrointestinal tract is non-functional or severely impaired, preventing proper digestion and absorption. This may occur with conditions such as severe malabsorption, intestinal obstruction, or when bowel rest is required.

Enteral feeding is generally less invasive than parenteral feeding. Tube placement for enteral feeding is often less complex and does not involve direct access to the bloodstream, which reduces the risk of serious infection.

Yes, there are several types of enteral feeding tubes, including nasogastric (NG) and nasojejunal (NJ) tubes for short-term use, and surgically placed gastrostomy (G-tube) and jejunostomy (J-tube) for long-term use.

Parenteral feeding carries risks such as catheter-related bloodstream infections, metabolic complications like hyperglycemia, and potential liver issues, particularly with long-term use.

Yes, it is possible for a patient to receive a combination of both enteral and parenteral nutrition, especially during a transition period as their GI function recovers. The healthcare team monitors and adjusts the support as needed.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.