Skip to content

What is the Difference Between Sam and Mam MUAC?

5 min read

According to the World Health Organization, over 45 million children under five are affected by acute malnutrition globally. This critical health issue is categorized by severity using measurements like the Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC), distinguishing between Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) and Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM).

Quick Summary

Acute malnutrition is categorized into severe (SAM) and moderate (MAM) forms using specific MUAC cut-off points, which indicate different levels of health risk and require distinct medical or nutritional interventions for children.

Key Points

  • Cut-off Points: SAM is identified by a MUAC below 115 mm, while MAM is between 115 mm and 125 mm for children 6-59 months.

  • Color-Coding: SAM corresponds to the red zone on a MUAC tape, indicating severe wasting, while MAM corresponds to the yellow zone, indicating moderate wasting.

  • Mortality Risk: Children with SAM have a significantly higher risk of mortality and severe complications compared to those with MAM.

  • Treatment Approach: SAM treatment often requires intensive therapeutic feeding and potentially inpatient care, while MAM is typically managed with supplementary feeding and outpatient monitoring.

  • Diagnostic Complementarity: While MUAC is effective, other indicators like Weight-for-Height Z-score (WHZ) and oedema are also used, as MUAC may not detect all cases of malnutrition.

  • Community Screening: The simplicity of MUAC measurement makes it an ideal tool for mass, community-level screening, enabling early detection and rapid referral.

In This Article

What is MUAC?

Mid-Upper Arm Circumference, or MUAC, is a simple, inexpensive, and non-invasive screening tool used primarily for assessing the nutritional status of children aged 6 to 59 months. By measuring the circumference of a child's left upper arm, health workers can quickly determine the degree of muscle wasting, a key indicator of acute malnutrition. The widespread use of MUAC tapes, often color-coded, allows for rapid, community-based screening, enabling early detection and timely intervention that can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality rates.

How MUAC is Measured

Accurate MUAC measurement is crucial for reliable assessment. The process is straightforward, requiring minimal training:

  • The child's left arm is bent at a 90-degree angle to locate the midpoint between the shoulder and the elbow.
  • The arm is then straightened and the MUAC tape is wrapped around this midpoint.
  • The tape must be snug but not too tight, and the measurement is read at the arrow indicator.
  • The color-coded tape provides an immediate classification: green for normal, yellow for moderate acute malnutrition (MAM), and red for severe acute malnutrition (SAM).

SAM MUAC vs. MAM MUAC: The Core Distinction

The primary difference between SAM and MAM MUAC lies in the specific numerical cut-off points used to define the severity of acute malnutrition, which dictates the required level of medical care and nutritional support. The World Health Organization (WHO) provides standardized guidelines for these classifications.

Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) by MUAC

SAM is the most life-threatening form of acute malnutrition and requires urgent, specialized medical attention. According to WHO guidelines for children aged 6 to 59 months, SAM is diagnosed when the MUAC measurement is less than 115 mm (11.5 cm), or if there is the presence of bilateral pitting edema, regardless of the MUAC value.

Characteristics of SAM according to MUAC include:

  • Cut-off point: < 115 mm.
  • Color-coding: Red zone on a color-coded MUAC tape.
  • Clinical implications: Children in the red zone are at a significantly higher risk of death due to infection and other complications. They often require immediate, intensive therapeutic feeding and medical treatment, which may involve inpatient care.

Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM) by MUAC

MAM represents a less severe stage of acute malnutrition but still indicates a significant health risk that warrants attention and intervention. For children aged 6 to 59 months, MAM is diagnosed when the MUAC measurement is equal to or greater than 115 mm, but less than 125 mm.

Characteristics of MAM according to MUAC include:

  • Cut-off point: ≥ 115 mm and < 125 mm.
  • Color-coding: Yellow zone on a color-coded MUAC tape.
  • Clinical implications: Children in the yellow zone are considered at risk of progressing to SAM. They typically receive supplementary feeding, nutritional counseling, and regular monitoring to prevent further deterioration.

Comparison of MUAC for SAM and MAM

The following table summarizes the key distinctions based on WHO standards for children aged 6 to 59 months, unless otherwise noted.

Feature Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM)
MUAC Cut-off < 115 mm (< 11.5 cm) ≥ 115 mm and < 125 mm (≥ 11.5 cm and < 12.5 cm)
Color on Tape Red Yellow
Mortality Risk Significantly elevated (up to 10-fold higher risk) Elevated, but lower than SAM
Treatment Setting Often requires inpatient care for complications; can be outpatient for uncomplicated cases Community-based outpatient management
Therapeutic Foods Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food (RUTF) for intensive treatment Ready-to-Use Supplementary Food (RUSF) or fortified blended foods
Bilateral Oedema Presence of bilateral pitting oedema is an independent diagnostic criterion for SAM Absent
Treatment Urgency Immediate and intensive Requires timely intervention and monitoring to prevent worsening

Why Differentiating SAM and MAM with MUAC is Crucial

Properly distinguishing between SAM and MAM is vital for effective public health interventions and individual patient care. This differentiation allows for the correct allocation of limited resources, ensuring that the most critically ill children receive the most intensive, life-saving care. For instance, a child with a red-zone MUAC reading may need immediate referral to a health facility for inpatient treatment, while a child in the yellow zone can be managed within the community through supplementary feeding programs. Early detection of MAM can prevent progression to the more severe and deadly SAM, thereby saving lives and reducing the burden on the healthcare system.

Furthermore, accurate classification through MUAC can improve treatment outcomes and program coverage. By training community health workers and even caregivers to use MUAC tapes, programs can increase the rate of early diagnosis and intervention. While MUAC is a highly effective screening tool, it's important to note that it may not capture all cases identified by other methods, such as Weight-for-Height Z-score (WHZ). For example, some studies show a significant proportion of children identified as SAM by WHZ are missed by a MUAC-only protocol, especially older children. Therefore, in many contexts, MUAC is used alongside other indicators to ensure comprehensive assessment. A combined approach can lead to a higher impact on therapeutic feeding programs.

The Broader Context of Malnutrition Assessment

While MUAC is a powerful and practical tool, it is part of a larger toolkit for nutritional assessment. Other key indicators include Weight-for-Height Z-score (WHZ) and the presence of bilateral pitting oedema. Each of these criteria can independently diagnose acute malnutrition. A child with oedema, for example, is automatically classified as SAM, regardless of their MUAC or WHZ. In many humanitarian settings, the combination of MUAC and oedema screening is the most practical method for rapid assessment and triage. In clinical and survey settings, WHZ is often used as a gold standard to which MUAC is compared. However, the portability and ease of use of MUAC make it indispensable for widespread community screening. You can find more comprehensive guidelines on these standards from the WHO on their official website: www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241598163.

Conclusion

The difference between SAM and MAM MUAC is a critical distinction that determines the severity of acute malnutrition and guides the appropriate course of action. SAM, identified by a MUAC below 115 mm, represents a severe, life-threatening condition requiring urgent medical intervention. MAM, indicated by a MUAC between 115 mm and 125 mm, is a moderate condition that necessitates supplementary feeding and close monitoring. The simple, color-coded MUAC tape is a revolutionary tool that allows even minimally trained individuals to identify these different levels of malnutrition in children aged 6 to 59 months, facilitating rapid and effective triage in both clinical and community settings. Recognizing these differences ensures that resources are allocated efficiently and that children at the highest risk receive the life-saving treatment they need.

Frequently Asked Questions

A yellow MUAC reading for a child aged 6-59 months indicates Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM). It means the child is at risk and requires supplementary feeding and regular monitoring to prevent their condition from worsening.

A red MUAC reading for a child aged 6-59 months indicates Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM). This is a critical medical condition requiring immediate, life-saving therapeutic feeding and potentially inpatient care.

Bilateral pitting oedema is swelling in both feet that leaves a temporary indentation when pressed. Its presence is an independent diagnostic criterion for Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM), regardless of the MUAC measurement.

While the specific SAM/MAM cut-off points (<115mm and 115-125mm) apply to children 6-59 months, MUAC tapes are also adapted with different cut-offs for assessing nutritional status in older children, adolescents, and adults.

MUAC is useful for mass screening because it is simple, quick, and requires minimal training and inexpensive tools. This allows community health workers and caregivers to rapidly assess many children, even in resource-limited settings, to identify those in need of intervention.

No, MUAC is not the only tool. Weight-for-Height Z-score (WHZ) and the presence of bilateral pitting oedema are also used as independent diagnostic criteria for acute malnutrition. A comprehensive assessment may use all three indicators.

Misclassification by MUAC can have serious consequences. A child with SAM missed by MUAC could experience delayed treatment, increasing their risk of death. Conversely, over-classification can strain limited resources. Regular calibration, proper training, and using other indicators like WHZ can help minimize such errors.

Yes, studies have shown that minimally trained caregivers can perform MUAC measurements with high accuracy, enabling earlier detection of malnutrition at the household level.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.