Skip to content

What is the Global nutrition Report 2016?

4 min read

In 2016, the Global Nutrition Report revealed that one in three people worldwide suffers from some form of malnutrition, a crisis affecting every country on the planet. This influential independent review was published to assess global progress toward meeting intergovernmental nutrition targets, highlighting successes and persistent failures.

Quick Summary

The Global Nutrition Report 2016 is an independent, multi-partner review of the world's nutrition status, documenting progress on commitments and recommending actions to accelerate gains. It focused on the "double burden" of malnutrition, highlighting rising obesity alongside continued undernutrition, and identified critical data gaps and insufficient investment.

Key Points

  • Double Burden of Malnutrition: The 2016 report confirmed that malnutrition includes both undernutrition and the rising crisis of overweight and obesity, often coexisting in the same countries.

  • Mixed Progress: While some countries showed success in reducing childhood stunting and wasting, the world was largely off-course for targets related to anemia in women and adult obesity.

  • Data Gaps: A fundamental challenge highlighted was the lack of sufficient and comparable data, which hindered proper assessment of progress and accountability in many countries.

  • Insufficient Commitment: The report found that global nutrition goals were often weak, investment was insufficient, and commitments made by stakeholders lacked the specificity needed for effective tracking.

  • Call to Action: The report served as a forceful call to action, urging stakeholders to make smarter, more ambitious commitments and to prioritize nutrition with adequate investment.

  • Multisectoral Approach: Success stories highlighted in the report demonstrated the effectiveness of multisectoral approaches, involving health, agriculture, and other areas.

In This Article

The Global Nutrition Report 2016, titled “From Promise to Impact: Ending Malnutrition by 2030,” was a crucial third edition in an annual series established in 2014. Published to serve as an independent review and accountability mechanism, it held a mirror to the global community's successes and failures in addressing malnutrition. A key theme was moving beyond promises to tangible action, specifically in the context of the newly established Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The report's central message was that every country faces a serious public health challenge from malnutrition, which includes not just undernutrition (stunting, wasting, micronutrient deficiencies) but also overweight, obesity, and diet-related non-communicable diseases.

Key Findings from the 2016 Report

The Double Burden of Malnutrition

A particularly stark finding was the widespread prevalence of the “double burden of malnutrition,” where countries face high rates of both undernutrition and overweight/obesity. The report found that at least 57 countries were experiencing significant levels of both undernutrition and adult overweight and obesity, placing immense strain on already fragile health systems. This phenomenon demonstrated that malnutrition was not just a problem of food scarcity but of a broken food system that failed to provide access to nutrient-rich, healthy diets for all. The number of overweight children under five was approaching the number of children suffering from wasting, signaling a critical shift in the global nutrition landscape.

Mixed Progress on Global Targets

The GNR 2016 presented a mixed picture of progress toward the global nutrition targets established by the World Health Assembly (WHA). While some positive movement was noted for under-5 stunting, wasting, and exclusive breastfeeding in some countries, progress on other fronts was lagging significantly.

  • Progress for some targets: Many countries showed good progress on targets like reducing stunting and wasting in children under five. This indicated that coordinated efforts could yield results when implemented effectively.
  • Off-track for many targets: The world was severely off-track for targets related to anemia in women, and adult overweight, obesity, and diabetes. The prevalence of adult overweight and obesity was rising in nearly every country, and anemia affected a staggering number of women of reproductive age.

Comparison of Progress Against Global Nutrition Targets

The 2016 report highlighted significant disparities in global progress, emphasizing that while some goals were within reach, others were being missed entirely. The following table summarizes the general status across key indicators based on the report's findings:

Indicator Status in 2016 Challenges/Context
Childhood Stunting Some progress, but still high prevalence in many areas Still affecting a massive number of children, especially in South Asia and Africa. Requires accelerated action to meet 2025 target.
Childhood Wasting Some progress, but significant burden remains Concentrated heavily in South Asia; progress noted in some countries but too slow globally.
Childhood Overweight Off-course, rising globally Prevalence increasing worldwide; countries need to halt the rise.
Anemia in Women Off-course, little to no progress Prevalence stubbornly high and affecting a large proportion of women of reproductive age globally.
Exclusive Breastfeeding Some progress, but not enough Rate of exclusive breastfeeding is below targets; accelerated improvements needed.
Adult Obesity Off-course, rising in nearly every country No country was on track to achieve the adult obesity target; a critical failure of global policy.
Adult Diabetes Off-course, rising prevalence Rising prevalence in nearly all regions and countries.

Identified Challenges and Obstacles

The report highlighted five key hurdles preventing effective global action against malnutrition:

  1. Weak Global Goals: The report criticized the limited inclusion of nutrition targets, particularly regarding breastfeeding, overweight, and obesity, within the initial framing of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
  2. Lack of Investment: Global spending on nutrition was found to be woefully inadequate. Despite some increases in development assistance, overall funding levels were insufficient to meet the scale of the problem.
  3. Sloppy Commitments: An analysis of commitments made at the 2013 Nutrition for Growth summit found that many were not SMART (Specific, Measurable, Assignable, Realistic, Time-bound), undermining accountability.
  4. Data Gaps: A severe lack of reliable, comparable data for many countries and key interventions was identified as a "fundamental impediment to accountability". Data for women and babies were particularly sparse.
  5. Failure to Engage Business: The report pointed to the poor engagement of the food and beverage industry in global nutrition goals, calling for a clearer framework for corporate responsibility.

Recommendations and Calls to Action

To reverse these trends, the Global Nutrition Report 2016 issued a strong call to action, urging stakeholders to take concrete steps. The report provided guidance to governments and others on making SMART commitments, increasing investment, and collecting better data. It emphasized that ending malnutrition is ultimately a political choice, and evidence from countries showing rapid improvement proved that with sufficient will, change is possible. The report pushed for greater accountability through stronger data collection and more ambitious, well-defined commitments from all sectors, including agriculture, education, and health. Ultimately, the report was a crucial reminder that while progress on some fronts was encouraging, the global fight against malnutrition was far from over and required sustained, high-impact commitment to finish the job by 2030.

For more detailed information, the official Global Nutrition Report website is an authoritative source. Official Global Nutrition Report Website

Conclusion

In summary, the Global Nutrition Report 2016 served as a vital wake-up call, emphasizing that malnutrition was the "new normal" and affecting one in three people. It highlighted the complexity of the issue, encompassing both undernutrition and overnutrition, and revealed mixed results on progress toward global targets. Crucially, the report laid bare the significant barriers to progress—including weak goals, inadequate investment, and critical data gaps—while also providing a clear roadmap for action through smarter commitments and greater accountability. The message was clear: ending all forms of malnutrition by 2030 would require a renewed political will and concrete, coordinated efforts across all sectors.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary purpose was to provide an independent and comprehensive annual review of the world's nutrition status, track progress against intergovernmental targets, and recommend actions to accelerate efforts to end malnutrition by 2030.

The 'double burden' refers to countries or regions facing high levels of both undernutrition (like stunting and wasting) and overnutrition (overweight and obesity) simultaneously. The 2016 report highlighted this as a widespread and growing problem.

Key challenges included weak global goals, a severe lack of data for measuring progress, insufficient financial investment, poorly defined commitments by nations, and inadequate engagement from the business sector.

No, the report showed mixed results. While some countries made progress on targets like reducing child stunting, most were off-track for adult obesity, diabetes, and anemia in women.

The report found that many commitments made at the 2013 Nutrition for Growth summit were not 'SMART' (Specific, Measurable, Assignable, Realistic, Time-bound), hindering effective tracking and accountability.

Data availability was identified as a 'fundamental impediment to accountability.' Many countries lacked sufficient data to assess their progress, particularly concerning key interventions and the nutritional status of women and babies.

The overall message was that ending malnutrition is achievable but requires greater political will and stronger, coordinated action. The report emphasized that while many countries were still failing, significant progress was possible with renewed and smarter commitments.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.