Skip to content

What is the Nutritional Risk in the Critically Ill Score?

3 min read

Malnutrition is a significant concern for critically ill patients, with prevalence rates ranging from 38% to 78% depending on the population studied. In response to the need for a reliable and specific assessment tool, researchers developed the Nutritional Risk in the Critically Ill (NUTRIC) score to help identify patients most likely to benefit from aggressive nutrition support.

Quick Summary

The NUTRIC score is a tool for assessing nutritional risk in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, predicting clinical outcomes like mortality and ventilation duration. It uses variables such as illness severity, age, and comorbidities to guide nutritional support strategies.

Key Points

  • ICU Specific: Designed for critically ill patients to address limitations of general tools.

  • Predictive: Correlates with adverse outcomes like increased mortality and prolonged mechanical ventilation.

  • Objective Metrics: Uses objective measures like APACHE II and SOFA scores instead of patient history.

  • Accessibility: The mNUTRIC version omits the IL-6 marker for easier clinical use.

  • Guidance: Helps prioritize aggressive nutritional support for high-risk patients.

  • Inflammation: Original score includes IL-6, recognizing inflammation's role in critical illness.

In This Article

Understanding the NUTRIC Score

The Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill (NUTRIC) score is a crucial tool developed specifically for use in the intensive care unit (ICU). Its purpose is to identify ICU patients who will most likely benefit from aggressive and early nutrition therapy to improve survival and shorten mechanical ventilation duration.

The score considers multiple patient factors to provide a comprehensive view of their nutritional status and prognosis. Unlike traditional nutritional assessments that may be unreliable in the ICU, the NUTRIC score focuses on markers of illness severity, inflammation, and comorbidities. Patients with higher NUTRIC scores may have increased mortality rates, longer ICU stays, and greater resource utilization.

Components of the NUTRIC Score

The original NUTRIC score includes six variables: age, APACHE II score, SOFA score, number of comorbidities, days from hospital to ICU admission, and Interleukin-6 (IL-6), a marker of inflammation. These factors are assigned points, contributing to a total score from 0 to 10. More detailed information on the specific points for each variable is available on the {Link: Critical Care Nutrition website https://www.criticalcarenutrition.com/resources/nutric-score}.

The Modified NUTRIC (mNUTRIC) Score

The mNUTRIC score was developed as a practical alternative, omitting the Interleukin-6 (IL-6) component, which is not always routinely available. This modified version ranges from 0 to 9 and retains much of the predictive value of the original score.

Practical Application of the NUTRIC/mNUTRIC Scores

Hospitals typically calculate the NUTRIC or mNUTRIC score soon after a patient enters the ICU. Based on the score, patients are classified as either low or high nutritional risk. A high score suggests a greater likelihood of benefiting from aggressive nutritional therapy. This allows for a more personalized approach to nutrition support.

Comparison of Risk Scores in the ICU

The NUTRIC score offers specific advantages for the ICU setting compared to general hospital ward tools like MUST or NRS-2002:

Feature NUTRIC Score MUST/NRS-2002
Target Population Exclusively designed and validated for critically ill, often mechanically ventilated, ICU patients. Designed for general hospital ward patients, proving less reliable and less specific for the ICU environment.
Inclusion of Illness Severity Integrates severe illness indicators (APACHE II, SOFA) as core components, recognizing the link between inflammation and nutritional risk. Relies on traditional metrics like weight loss and dietary intake, which are often unobtainable or misleading in ICU patients.
Independence from Patient History Can be calculated using objective clinical and laboratory data, bypassing communication barriers with sedated or unresponsive patients. Requires subjective information from the patient or caregiver regarding weight history and food intake.
Focus of Assessment Assesses a patient's inflammatory state and overall severity of illness to predict their response to nutrition therapy. Focuses more on assessing baseline nutritional status, which does not capture the dynamic, hyper-metabolic state of critical illness.

Limitations and Future Directions

Despite its value, the NUTRIC score has limitations, including variations in optimal cut-off values and the fact that it's a snapshot at admission, not a dynamic assessment. The mNUTRIC version, while more accessible, doesn't capture all aspects of nutritional status like micronutrient deficiencies. Research continues to validate the score in diverse populations and explore other potential inflammatory markers to improve accuracy and optimize nutritional interventions.

Conclusion

The NUTRIC (and mNUTRIC) score is a vital tool for managing critically ill patients by providing a systematic, evidence-based way to identify those at high risk of malnutrition-related complications. It links nutritional status to illness severity and inflammation, key features of critical illness. Its use helps prioritize aggressive nutritional support for vulnerable patients, potentially improving outcomes such as reduced mortality and shorter ventilation duration. The score is a valuable, widely supported tool in modern intensive care. For more information on critical care nutrition, consider visiting the official {Link: Critical Care Nutrition website https://www.criticalcarenutrition.com/resources/nutric-score}.

Frequently Asked Questions

A high NUTRIC score indicates a patient is at high nutritional risk, associated with worse outcomes, and likely to benefit from intensive nutritional therapy.

The NUTRIC score includes IL-6, while the mNUTRIC score omits it, making the mNUTRIC version more practical as IL-6 testing is not always available.

It is calculated using variables like age, APACHE II, SOFA, comorbidities, and days from hospital to ICU admission. The full score also includes IL-6.

It is designed for critically ill adult ICU patients, especially those mechanically ventilated, to identify those at heightened risk.

Yes, it is an effective prognostic tool, with a higher score strongly associated with increased risk of death.

Limitations include the non-routine availability of IL-6, variations in cut-off points, and its snapshot nature, not capturing evolving needs or micronutrient deficiencies.

A low score indicates lower relative risk but does not eliminate the need for proper nutritional care; standard support may suffice, while high-risk patients need more targeted therapy.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.