Skip to content

What is the Optimal Mid Upper Arm Circumference Cutoffs to Screen Severe Acute Malnutrition in Vietnamese Children?

3 min read

According to a 2020 study published in AIMS Public Health, the standard World Health Organization (WHO) mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) cutoff for severe acute malnutrition (SAM) was found to have low sensitivity in specific Vietnamese regions. This research demonstrated that adopting an alternative and higher cutoff is needed to define optimal mid upper arm circumference cutoffs to screen severe acute malnutrition in Vietnamese children.

Quick Summary

A Vietnamese study found a higher MUAC cutoff (13.5cm) significantly improves the detection of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in children compared to the standard WHO 11.5cm cutoff. Tailoring screening methods to local populations addresses regional body composition variations, increasing identification and facilitating earlier treatment.

Key Points

  • Localized Cutoff Recommended: A 2020 study identified 13.5 cm as the optimal MUAC cutoff for screening severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in Vietnamese children aged 6-59 months in Northern Midlands and mountainous areas.

  • Higher Sensitivity: The recommended 13.5 cm MUAC cutoff offers significantly higher sensitivity (65%) for detecting SAM compared to the standard WHO cutoff of <11.5 cm (5%).

  • WHO Standard Inadequate Locally: The universal WHO MUAC cutoff of <11.5 cm was found to perform poorly in the specific Vietnamese population studied, missing a large number of SAM cases.

  • Complementary Screening Tools: Using the locally optimized MUAC cutoff in combination with Weight-for-Height Z-score (WHZ) can achieve a higher impact on therapeutic feeding programs.

  • Enables Better Intervention: A more accurate MUAC cutoff allows for more effective community-based screening and earlier intervention for at-risk children, ultimately reducing mortality.

  • Adaptation is Key: This research underscores the importance of adapting global health guidelines to local contexts to account for differences in body composition and regional factors.

In This Article

The Challenge of Malnutrition Screening

Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is a life-threatening condition for children under five years old, dramatically increasing their mortality risk. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines SAM based on several criteria, including a mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) of less than 11.5 cm and/or a weight-for-height z-score (WHZ) below -3SD. MUAC is widely used for community-level screening because it is a simple, quick, and inexpensive tool. However, research has increasingly shown that universal cutoffs may not be optimal across all populations due to differing body compositions and other regional factors. This has led to validation studies to determine the most appropriate cutoffs for specific settings, including Vietnam.

Optimal Mid Upper Arm Circumference Cutoffs in Vietnam

A community-based cross-sectional survey conducted in 2020 examined 4,764 Vietnamese children aged 6–59 months in the Northern Midlands and mountainous areas to determine the optimal MUAC cutoff for screening SAM. The study compared the WHO's standard MUAC cutoff of <11.5 cm against the more robust and traditionally used WHZ criteria (< -3SD). The findings were striking and led to a key recommendation for the region.

Researchers found that relying on the WHO's MUAC cutoff (<11.5 cm) identified only a small fraction of the children classified with SAM by the WHZ standard, indicating very low sensitivity. After analyzing various potential cutoffs, the study concluded that an optimal MUAC cutoff of 13.5 cm significantly improved the screening process. At this higher threshold, the sensitivity for detecting SAM increased dramatically from 5% (at the 11.5 cm cutoff) to 65%. This means that using the higher, locally validated cutoff would identify and allow for the inclusion of a much larger proportion of severely malnourished children into therapeutic feeding programs. The study authors specifically recommended that the 13.5 cm cutoff should be used for improving and preventing SAM in the midland and mountainous areas of Vietnam.

Comparison of MUAC Cutoffs

Screening Criterion Standard WHO MUAC Cutoff Optimal Vietnamese Regional Cutoff
MUAC Value for SAM < 11.5 cm (6-59 months) ≤ 13.5 cm (in Northern Midlands and mountainous areas, 6-59 months)
Sensitivity (vs WHZ) Very Low (5% observed in Vietnam study) High (65% observed in Vietnam study)
Specificity (vs WHZ) High (99% observed in Vietnam study) Moderate (72% observed in Vietnam study)
Target Population Universal, 6-59 months Localized, 6-59 months
Implication Fails to identify many children with SAM in specific settings Significantly increases case detection and programmatic reach

Benefits and Future Direction

Adopting a locally optimized MUAC cutoff, like the 13.5 cm value recommended for parts of Vietnam, offers multiple benefits. By identifying more children in need of care, it can improve programmatic coverage for Community-based Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) and ultimately reduce child morbidity and mortality. This is particularly critical in regions with high malnutrition prevalence, such as the mountainous areas of Vietnam. The increased sensitivity allows for earlier detection and intervention, which is less resource-intensive than treating complicated, advanced cases of SAM.

While the study provides strong evidence for a higher cutoff in specific regions of Vietnam, further research is warranted. A larger, prospective study that accounts for factors like stunting, body composition, and different livelihood zones could help refine age-specific or region-specific MUAC cutoffs for even greater accuracy. The synergy between MUAC and WHZ measurements should also continue to be explored to maximize impact on therapeutic feeding programs.

Conclusion

The determination of appropriate mid upper arm circumference cutoffs to screen severe acute malnutrition in Vietnamese children is a critical step towards improving nutritional outcomes. Based on robust scientific evidence, a localized approach with a higher MUAC threshold of 13.5 cm is superior to the standard WHO 11.5 cm cutoff for screening children aged 6–59 months in certain Vietnamese regions. Adopting this evidence-based strategy will enable healthcare providers and community workers to identify more children at risk, ensuring they receive timely and effective treatment and thereby significantly reducing the mortality associated with severe acute malnutrition. The findings highlight the importance of adapting global health standards to local contexts for maximum public health benefit.

For more information on global malnutrition guidelines, see the WHO's page on the identification of severe acute malnutrition.

Frequently Asked Questions

Universal MUAC cutoffs may not be optimal because body composition and environmental factors can vary significantly between different populations. The standard 11.5 cm WHO cutoff, for example, had very low sensitivity in the Vietnamese population studied.

The study found that a MUAC cutoff of 13.5 cm was optimal for screening severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in children aged 6–59 months in Northern Midlands and mountainous areas of Vietnam, showing much higher sensitivity than the standard 11.5 cm cutoff.

A higher MUAC cutoff increases the sensitivity of the screening tool, meaning it can correctly identify a larger proportion of children with severe acute malnutrition who would otherwise be missed by the lower, standard cutoff.

The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends a MUAC cutoff of <11.5 cm for diagnosing severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in children aged 6–59 months.

In addition to MUAC, other diagnostic criteria for severe acute malnutrition include a weight-for-height z-score (WHZ) below -3SD and/or the presence of bilateral pitting edema.

MUAC is generally preferred for community-level screening due to its simplicity and low cost, but it and WHZ can identify different subgroups of malnourished children. Combining both criteria can lead to higher diagnostic accuracy and impact.

Using validated regional cutoffs, as demonstrated by the Vietnamese study, ensures that screening tools are accurately identifying children who are most at risk in a specific local context, maximizing the effectiveness of public health interventions.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.