Skip to content

What is the unhealthiest fish to eat?

4 min read

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), certain fish species, primarily large predators, contain the highest levels of methylmercury, a potent neurotoxin. This raises the critical question of what is the unhealthiest fish to consume and why, impacting dietary choices for vulnerable populations like children and pregnant women.

Quick Summary

Several fish species are considered unhealthy due to high levels of mercury and other pollutants like PCBs and dioxins. This is especially dangerous for pregnant women and young children. Contamination levels are influenced by a fish's diet, age, and habitat. Safer alternatives exist for those seeking the nutritional benefits of seafood with minimal risks.

Key Points

  • High-Mercury Predators are Unhealthy: Apex predators like shark, swordfish, and king mackerel accumulate the most mercury and should be avoided or consumed very rarely, especially by pregnant women and children.

  • Long Lifespan Means High Contaminants: Fish like orange roughy, which can live for over 100 years, build up high levels of mercury and other pollutants over their long lives.

  • Wild vs. Farmed Differences: Certain farmed fish, such as some salmon, may contain higher levels of PCBs and dioxins from their feed, while wild-caught versions are generally cleaner.

  • Healthier Alternatives Exist: Safest and healthiest choices include smaller, low-mercury fish like sardines, anchovies, and Atlantic mackerel, which are also rich in omega-3s.

  • Biomagnification Is Key: Contaminants accumulate up the food chain, meaning larger, predatory fish at the top have the highest concentrations, a process known as biomagnification.

In This Article

Top contenders for the title of unhealthiest fish

Identifying the "unhealthiest fish" is complex, as it depends on factors like contamination source, mercury levels, and personal health. However, some species consistently appear on advisory lists from health authorities like the FDA and the EPA due to their high levels of contaminants.

The primary culprits: high mercury levels

Mercury, particularly its organic form methylmercury, is a potent neurotoxin that poses a risk to human health, especially to the developing brains of unborn babies and young children. Larger, longer-lived predatory fish accumulate mercury through a process called biomagnification, where mercury levels increase with each step up the food chain.

  • Shark: As apex predators, sharks can live for a very long time and consume a wide variety of smaller marine life, leading to some of the highest mercury concentrations found in seafood. They are consistently listed among fish to be avoided, particularly by sensitive groups.
  • Swordfish: Another large, predatory species, swordfish is known for its high mercury content, which has led to consumption advisories for pregnant women and children. While a lean protein source, its mercury risk makes it a poor choice for frequent consumption.
  • King Mackerel: The larger, older king mackerel can have significantly high mercury levels, making it a fish to eat sparingly or avoid. This is in contrast to the smaller Atlantic mackerel, which has much lower mercury levels.
  • Orange Roughy: This deep-sea fish is notoriously long-lived, potentially reaching ages over 100 years, which gives it ample time to accumulate contaminants. It is often listed as a high-mercury fish and has also raised environmental concerns due to past overfishing and destructive harvesting methods.
  • Tilefish (Gulf of Mexico): Tilefish from the Gulf of Mexico is singled out by the FDA for its very high mercury content. In contrast, Atlantic tilefish, depending on the fishing area, may have lower levels and is often rated as a moderate-mercury choice.

Additional contaminants and farming concerns

Beyond mercury, other factors can make a fish a less healthy choice. These include pollutants like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins, and pesticides, which are often fat-soluble and accumulate in the tissues of fish.

  • Farmed Salmon vs. Wild-Caught: While salmon is often celebrated for its omega-3 content, farmed salmon raises different health concerns than its wild-caught counterpart. Studies have found that farmed salmon may contain higher levels of certain contaminants, such as PCBs and dioxins, potentially due to the composition of its feed. They may also have a higher saturated fat content and can be raised with antibiotics. Wild-caught salmon, particularly from Alaska, is often considered a safer and healthier option.

Comparison: high-risk vs. low-risk fish

To help guide your seafood choices, this table compares high-risk fish species with their low-risk, healthier alternatives, focusing on mercury levels and other common contaminants.

Feature High-Risk Fish (e.g., Shark, Swordfish, Orange Roughy) Low-Risk Fish (e.g., Salmon, Sardines, Trout)
Mercury Levels Very High. Apex predators with long lifespans accumulate significant amounts of mercury through biomagnification. Low. Smaller, shorter-lived fish and those lower on the food chain contain much lower mercury levels.
Other Contaminants Higher Levels. Can accumulate PCBs, dioxins, and other pollutants, especially if from contaminated waters. Lower Levels. Less prone to accumulating high concentrations of pollutants.
Omega-3s (EPA/DHA) Variable. Some high-mercury fish, like swordfish, offer omega-3s, but the benefits may be outweighed by the mercury risk. High. Excellent source of essential omega-3 fatty acids, crucial for brain and heart health.
Source/Sustainability Often targeted by industrial fishing, leading to overfishing and habitat concerns. Populations are slow to recover. Many are managed sustainably and reproduce quickly, making them a more environmentally responsible choice.
Health Impact Significant risk, especially for pregnant women, young children, and those with regular high intake. Can lead to developmental problems. Supports heart, brain, and overall health with minimal associated contaminant risks.

Making informed choices for your diet

Choosing which fish to eat comes down to balancing nutritional benefits with potential health risks. The healthiest approach is to consume a variety of fish, favoring those lower in the food chain.

How to reduce your risk

  1. Follow Seafood Advisories: The FDA and EPA provide up-to-date guidance on which fish to avoid and which are safer to eat based on their mercury content. Pay special attention to recommendations for vulnerable groups.
  2. Vary Your Fish Intake: By eating a diverse range of fish, you reduce your exposure to any single contaminant. Opt for smaller, shorter-lived fish like anchovies, sardines, and pollock.
  3. Choose Wild-Caught: When possible, opt for wild-caught fish, especially salmon. Wild-caught fish often have lower levels of pollutants compared to farmed fish raised in potentially contaminated feed or crowded enclosures.
  4. Practice Proper Cooking and Storage: For fish like tuna, proper refrigeration is key to preventing histamine buildup, which causes scombroid poisoning. Cooking does not eliminate contaminants like mercury, but it's essential for preventing bacterial illness.

Conclusion: Navigating the seafood aisle

While the nutritional benefits of eating fish are well-documented, the presence of contaminants like mercury, PCBs, and dioxins means that some species are much less healthy than others. The question of what is the unhealthiest fish often leads to large, long-lived predators like shark, swordfish, and certain mackerel due to biomagnification of mercury. However, risks can also be associated with certain farmed varieties, such as salmon raised with high levels of antibiotics or contaminants in their feed. Consumers can make healthier choices by favoring smaller, lower-mercury species and checking advisories from reputable organizations. By being mindful of sourcing and following consumption guidelines, you can safely enjoy the benefits of seafood without taking on unnecessary health risks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Shark and Gulf of Mexico tilefish are often cited as having the highest mercury concentrations among commonly consumed fish.

Yes, tilapia is generally considered a healthy and low-mercury option. However, some sources note farmed tilapia may have a less favorable omega-3 to omega-6 fatty acid ratio than other fish.

Excessive mercury consumption, particularly in the form of methylmercury, can cause brain and nerve damage, and is especially harmful to the developing nervous systems of fetuses and young children.

No, cooking fish does not remove mercury. The metal is bound to the fish's tissue and cannot be eliminated through heat or other preparation methods.

Orange roughy is considered unhealthy due to its very long lifespan, which allows it to accumulate high levels of mercury over decades. It is also a concern environmentally due to past overfishing.

Excellent sources of omega-3s with low mercury risk include sardines, anchovies, Atlantic mackerel, and wild-caught salmon.

For fish with moderate mercury levels like albacore tuna, the FDA and EPA recommend limiting consumption to about one serving per week for pregnant women and young children.

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.