What is Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC)?
Mid-Upper Arm Circumference, or MUAC, is an anthropometric measurement used to assess the nutritional status of an individual by measuring the circumference of the mid-upper arm. It is a simple, cost-effective, and highly effective method, particularly useful for rapid screening in community-based programs and emergency settings where more complex equipment for measuring weight-for-height may not be available. The measurement primarily reflects the mass of muscle and subcutaneous fat in the upper arm, providing an indicator of overall body protein and energy reserves. A low MUAC indicates recent weight loss and is a strong predictor of mortality in malnourished children.
MUAC Cutoff Points for Malnutrition
The World Health Organization (WHO) and other international bodies have established standardized MUAC cutoff points to categorize nutritional status. These cutoffs vary by age group and are typically used in conjunction with other clinical signs like bilateral edema for a full diagnosis.
Pediatric Cutoffs (Children 6–59 Months)
For children between 6 and 59 months, MUAC is a critical indicator for identifying acute malnutrition:
- Normal Nutritional Status: MUAC ≥ 125 mm
- Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM): MUAC ≥ 115 mm to < 125 mm
- Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM): MUAC < 115 mm
Adult Cutoffs
MUAC is also an effective screening tool for adults, including pregnant women. Standard cutoffs exist for adolescents and adults to help detect underweight, particularly when Body Mass Index (BMI) is not feasible to measure.
- Normal Nutritional Status: MUAC ≥ 220 mm
- Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM): MUAC ≥ 185 mm to < 220 mm
- Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM): MUAC < 185 mm
Pregnant Women
Specific MUAC cutoffs are also recommended for pregnant and postpartum women to screen for undernutrition:
- Normal Nutritional Status: MUAC ≥ 230 mm
- Moderate Acute Malnutrition: MUAC ≥ 190 mm to < 230 mm
- Severe Acute Malnutrition: MUAC < 190 mm
How to Measure MUAC Correctly
Accurate measurement is crucial to ensure reliable results. The process involves a few simple steps, often performed using a color-coded MUAC tape provided by organizations like UNICEF. You can find detailed steps and illustrations on how to measure MUAC correctly in the referenced document. Key steps include positioning the arm, locating the midpoint between the shoulder and elbow, wrapping the tape snugly but not tightly, and reading the measurement at the indicator.
MUAC vs. Weight-for-Height Z-Score (WHZ): A Comparison
MUAC and Weight-for-Height Z-Score (WHZ) are both used to assess malnutrition but have key differences in application and what they measure. They are not interchangeable and can identify different populations of malnourished individuals.
| Feature | Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) | Weight-for-Height Z-Score (WHZ) | 
|---|---|---|
| Equipment | Simple, low-cost tape measure. | Requires accurate scales and stadiometers/length boards. | 
| Ease of Use | Very easy and quick to administer, requires minimal training. | Requires more training and can be difficult for uncooperative or immobile individuals. | 
| Portability | Highly portable, ideal for field and community screenings. | Less portable due to bulkier equipment. | 
| Indicator | Reflects fat and muscle wasting, a strong predictor of mortality. | Reflects body weight relative to height, gold standard for diagnosis. | 
| Age Bias | Absolute cutoffs can favor younger, smaller children over older ones. | Less age-biased for children within the 6-59 month range. | 
| Complementarity | Identifies a specific group of children not always flagged by WHZ. | Standard diagnostic criterion, but can miss some cases identified by MUAC. | 
Factors Affecting MUAC and Its Interpretation
Factors such as age, gender, and underlying health conditions can influence MUAC measurements. For children aged 6 to 59 months, a single MUAC cutoff might be less accurate for younger or older children within this range compared to a middle age group. Some research suggests that age and gender-specific MUAC cutoffs could improve accuracy. MUAC is best used as a screening tool to prompt further clinical assessment rather than a sole diagnostic indicator.
The Role of MUAC in Nutritional Screening and Management
MUAC is a pivotal frontline screening tool for identifying individuals at high risk of malnutrition, particularly valuable in community-based management of acute malnutrition (CMAM) programs and emergency settings. Its simplicity allows non-specialized health workers to conduct widespread screenings. By identifying individuals with low MUAC, resources for therapeutic feeding and medical care can be prioritized for those at highest risk.
Conclusion
The upper arm measurement for malnutrition, or MUAC, is a simple but powerful tool for assessing nutritional status. Using specific cutoff points for different populations, it effectively screens for moderate or severe acute malnutrition. While its use requires considering factors like age and complementing it with other assessments, MUAC remains a critical tool in global public health for the early detection and management of malnutrition, especially in vulnerable groups.