Skip to content

What Qualifies an Area as a Food Desert?

4 min read

According to the USDA, nearly 19 million people in the United States live in low-income and low-access areas, often defined as food deserts. A food desert is a complex issue driven by a combination of geographic, economic, and social factors that restrict access to healthy, affordable food options. Understanding these qualifiers is the first step toward developing effective solutions for community food insecurity.

Quick Summary

An area is classified as a food desert based on limited access to affordable, nutritious food, determined by a community's low-income status and its distance from large grocery stores, alongside transportation challenges.

Key Points

  • USDA Criteria: A food desert is officially identified by the USDA using Low-Income, Low-Access (LILA) criteria, based on a census tract's poverty rate and distance to a supermarket.

  • Distance Matters: Urban areas qualify with residents over 1 mile from a store, while rural areas require residents to be over 10 miles away.

  • Income is Key: A low-income census tract is defined as one with a poverty rate of 20% or a median family income not exceeding 80% of the area median.

  • Beyond Geography: Factors like limited transportation, high prices, and poor food quality can make an area a food desert, even if a store is nearby.

  • Health Impacts: Living in a food desert is linked to higher rates of chronic diseases, including obesity, diabetes, and heart disease.

  • Food Apartheid: The term 'food apartheid' is increasingly used to highlight the systemic racism and socio-economic inequities underlying unequal food access.

In This Article

Defining a Food Desert: The USDA Framework

Defining what qualifies an area as a food desert begins with the criteria set by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). The USDA identifies Low-Income, Low-Access (LILA) areas using census tract data, based on income level and geographic proximity to a supermarket or large grocery store.

Low-Income Status

To qualify as a LILA area, a census tract must meet specific income criteria, such as having a poverty rate of 20% or higher, or a median family income no more than 80% of the surrounding area's median.

Low-Access Criteria

Access is measured by distance to food retailers, with different standards for urban and rural locations. In urban areas, a significant portion of the population (at least 500 people or 33%) must live over one mile from the nearest large grocery store. In rural areas, this distance increases to over 10 miles.

More Than Just Miles

While the USDA framework provides a basis, many argue it doesn't capture the full picture. Factors like affordability, food quality, and cultural relevance are also critical. The term "food apartheid" is sometimes used to emphasize the role of systemic inequalities in creating unequal food access.

The Overlooked Factors: Beyond the USDA Criteria

An area can display characteristics of a food desert even without meeting strict USDA criteria. Several qualitative factors contribute to a challenging food environment.

  • Retail Environment: Areas with many convenience and fast-food stores but few healthy options are sometimes called "food swamps". These outlets often sell less nutritious food at lower prices.
  • Transportation Access: Limited public transit or car ownership significantly hinders access to distant grocery stores, even if the geographic distance meets the USDA standard. Obstacles like highways or lack of safe walking paths can also make nearby stores inaccessible.
  • Store Inventory and Pricing: High prices for healthy food, even in nearby stores (a "food mirage"), can be a major barrier for low-income residents. Smaller local markets may also have limited selection and higher prices for fresh goods.
  • Economic Barriers: The inability to afford healthy food is a fundamental issue, meaning low-income individuals cannot purchase desirable food despite its availability.

The Consequences of Living in a Food Desert

Limited access to healthy food in food deserts is associated with negative health outcomes, particularly diet-related diseases.

Health Outcomes and Food Deserts

  • Obesity: The prevalence of readily available, calorie-dense processed foods contributes to higher rates of obesity.
  • Chronic Diseases: Diets lacking nutritious options are linked to increased instances of type-2 diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease. Research indicates a correlation between living in a food desert and reduced life expectancy.
  • Mental Health: Food insecurity and the stress associated with limited access can also negatively impact mental health.

Comparison: Urban vs. Rural Food Deserts

Food deserts present distinct challenges in urban and rural settings. This comparison highlights key differences:

Feature Urban Food Deserts Rural Food Deserts
Physical Distance Typically over 1 mile from a supermarket. Often over 10 miles from a supermarket.
Transportation Reliance on public transit or walking, potentially facing unsafe routes. Greater dependence on car ownership, often with limited public transit.
Retail Landscape Many fast-food and convenience stores; few full-service grocery stores. Small local shops with limited fresh options; may be impacted by larger retailers.
Associated Issues Linked to concentrated poverty and disinvestment in certain neighborhoods. Connected to economic decline and long distances for services.

Solutions and Alternative Approaches

Addressing food deserts requires a variety of solutions that go beyond just opening new grocery stores.

  • Community-Based Initiatives: Supporting community gardens and urban agriculture provides fresh produce and builds resilience.
  • Incentives and Funding: Programs like the Healthy Food Financing Initiative encourage grocery store development in underserved areas.
  • Improving Access: Expanding farmers' markets, food banks, and making SNAP benefits usable with online retailers can improve access to nutritious food.

Conclusion

Qualifying an area as a food desert involves more than just measuring distance to a grocery store. The USDA uses low-income and low-access criteria, but factors like transportation, affordability, food quality, and systemic inequalities are equally important. Effective solutions must address this complex interplay of geographic, economic, and social barriers to ensure equitable food access for all communities.

How Community Gardens Help Fight Food Deserts

Community gardens combat food deserts by providing local, affordable fresh produce, reducing reliance on distant stores and transportation, and offering opportunities for nutrition education. They address multiple barriers by supplementing diets, improving physical access within neighborhoods, and building healthier eating habits, making them a valuable tool for food security and public health in underserved areas.

Food Empowerment Project offers a critical perspective on the socio-economic drivers behind food insecurity.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary factors used by the USDA are a combination of low-income status within a census tract and a significant distance for residents to travel to the nearest large grocery store or supermarket.

A census tract must have a poverty rate of 20% or higher, or a median family income at or below 80% of the area's median. This economic barrier limits the purchasing power for healthy food, even if it is physically available.

The key difference is the distance threshold. In urban areas, residents must live more than one mile from a supermarket, whereas in rural areas, that distance increases to more than 10 miles.

Yes, some researchers and advocates criticize the term for focusing only on geographic distance and failing to address underlying systemic issues like racism and poverty. Some prefer terms like 'food apartheid' to highlight intentional structural inequities.

A 'food mirage' refers to low-income areas where grocery stores are present, but the healthy food options are prohibitively expensive for local residents, making them effectively inaccessible despite their proximity.

Inadequate access to reliable transportation, including limited public transit or low car ownership, is a significant non-geographic factor that exacerbates food desert conditions, making travel to grocery stores challenging.

Alternatives include supporting community gardens, implementing farmers' markets that accept government assistance, providing incentives for convenience stores to stock healthier options, and improving public transit to existing grocery stores.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.