European Adoption of Nutri-Score
The Nutri-Score system originated in France and was officially adopted in 2017. Since then, a number of other European countries have followed suit, recognizing its value in public health campaigns aimed at reducing diet-related diseases. The system assigns a score from 'A' (dark green) for the most nutritionally favorable foods to 'E' (dark orange) for the least. This voluntary label is managed by a transnational governance structure, which ensures coordinated implementation and ongoing scientific oversight across participating nations.
The implementation of Nutri-Score, while voluntary for companies in many of these countries, encourages food manufacturers to reformulate products to achieve a better score, benefiting consumers. The system calculates a product's score based on both beneficial components (fruits, vegetables, protein, fibre) and unfavorable ones (calories, sugar, salt, saturated fats). Updates to the algorithm, such as those finalized in 2023, ensure the system aligns with the latest scientific findings.
Countries Officially Endorsing Nutri-Score
As of 2025, several countries have officially recommended and are engaged in the governance of Nutri-Score, including:
- France: The country of origin, which first adopted the label in 2017.
- Belgium: Implemented the system in 2018, seeing growing consumer knowledge and corporate adoption.
- Germany: Introduced Nutri-Score in late 2020 after a comprehensive evaluation and consumer research.
- Luxembourg: Officially adopted the label in 2021.
- The Netherlands: Began using the Nutri-Score logo on January 1, 2024, after studies showed its effectiveness.
- Spain: Officially adopted the label in 2021, launching campaigns to raise public awareness.
- Portugal: Adopted Nutri-Score in April 2024, joining the growing list of endorsing nations.
- Switzerland: Outside the EU, Switzerland is also a member of the transnational governance and adopted the system in 2019.
Voluntary Usage and Growing International Interest
The voluntary nature of Nutri-Score is a key feature in countries that have adopted it. This means while companies are not legally required to use it, many choose to do so to appeal to health-conscious consumers. The label’s competitive advantage has led some food companies in other countries, like Slovenia, Austria, and Ukraine, to display the label even without official government recommendation. Furthermore, the label has sparked international attention beyond Europe, including discussions and studies in countries such as China and the UAE.
The Debate on Mandatory Implementation
Advocates, such as the consumer organization foodwatch, have pushed for the Nutri-Score to become a mandatory, EU-wide front-of-pack label. This is because under the current voluntary system, manufacturers of products with poor nutritional scores may simply choose not to display the label, creating a biased view of the market. This was a key debate during the development of the EU's Farm to Fork Strategy. Mandatory labeling would provide a level playing field and more complete information for consumers. However, some countries, particularly Italy, have voiced opposition, promoting alternative systems like the NutrInform Battery.
Comparison of Voluntary vs. Mandatory FOPNL
| Aspect | Voluntary Nutri-Score | Mandatory EU-wide Nutri-Score (Proposed) |
|---|---|---|
| Current Status | Deployed in multiple countries where companies can opt-in to label products. | Awaiting EU-wide legislation, championed by consumer groups and some member states. |
| Consumer Information | Patchy and inconsistent; only products from willing manufacturers display the label. | Consistent and comprehensive across all eligible food products, aiding informed choices. |
| Manufacturer Incentive | Provides a competitive advantage for products with good scores, encouraging some reformulation. | Creates universal pressure for product reformulation, with no hiding of poor nutritional quality. |
| Market Competition | Can be skewed, as companies with less healthy products may opt out of labeling. | Ensures fair competition by standardizing nutritional transparency for all manufacturers. |
| Regulatory Framework | Coordinated by a transnational steering and scientific committee for endorsing countries. | Would be based on a single, binding European law, simplifying regulations for manufacturers operating across the EU. |
Conclusion
The Nutri-Score system has evolved from a French public health initiative into a significant transnational food labeling effort, officially adopted by several key European countries. Its voluntary implementation has successfully increased nutritional transparency and encouraged some product reformulation. However, the debate over its voluntary versus mandatory status highlights ongoing challenges in creating a uniformly transparent food market. While Nutri-Score’s simple, color-coded scale is demonstrably effective at helping consumers make healthier decisions, its full potential relies on consistent and comprehensive application across markets. As discussions continue at both national and European levels, the list of countries using Nutri-Score may continue to grow, signaling a broader commitment to public health.
Foodwatch and Mandatory Labeling
Consumer advocacy groups like foodwatch actively campaign for mandatory, EU-wide Nutri-Score implementation. They argue that the current voluntary system allows manufacturers of unhealthier foods to avoid labeling, undermining the system's effectiveness and consumer trust. For more information on their campaigns and a deeper dive into the politics behind food labeling in Europe, visit foodwatch.org.
The Nutri-Mark in the UAE
In a notable international development, the Abu Dhabi Quality and Conformity Council introduced a mandatory food labeling system called Nutri-Mark, which closely mirrors the Nutri-Score model. Starting in 2025, it requires certain product categories to display the label, demonstrating interest in similar health initiatives beyond Europe.
Ongoing Algorithm Updates
The Nutri-Score algorithm is not static. An independent scientific committee reviews and updates it to reflect evolving nutritional science. A revised algorithm was implemented in early 2024, with updates including a better scoring for healthy products like oily fish and a stricter evaluation of sugary items. This commitment to scientific integrity ensures the label remains a relevant tool for public health.
The Role of Open Food Facts
Platforms like Open Food Facts track the real-world usage of Nutri-Score across various countries. These databases show the number of brands and products displaying the label, offering a transparent look into its market penetration and voluntary adoption rates. This crowdsourced data provides valuable insights into how effectively the labeling system is being adopted by the industry.
Challenges and Industry Resistance
Despite its benefits, Nutri-Score faces resistance. Some sectors of the food industry, especially those with products that tend to receive a low score, have lobbied against its widespread adoption. This opposition underscores the tension between public health goals and commercial interests within the food market. The ongoing debate in the EU reflects this conflict, with legislative progress facing significant hurdles.