Skip to content

Which food dyes are carcinogenic? A detailed look

5 min read

In January 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finalized a ban on the food additive Red Dye 3 from food and ingested drugs due to its carcinogenic properties in animals. This move brought renewed attention to the question of which food dyes are carcinogenic and what risks other artificial colorings might pose.

Quick Summary

Several synthetic food dyes, including Red 3 and Red 40, have been linked to cancer in animal and laboratory studies. Concerns also exist over carcinogenic contaminants in Yellow 5 and Yellow 6. Experts advise limiting exposure to all artificial colorings.

Key Points

  • Red 3 has a confirmed carcinogenic link: Found to cause thyroid cancer in animal studies, it was banned for use in food and ingested drugs by the FDA in January 2025, effective in 2027.

  • Red 40 is linked to DNA damage in mice: Recent research indicates that Red 40 can damage DNA and cause colonic inflammation, correlating with the rise of early-onset colorectal cancer.

  • Yellow 5 and Yellow 6 may contain carcinogens: Concerns exist over contamination with carcinogenic chemicals like benzidine in these dyes, as well as evidence of genotoxicity in lab studies.

  • Dyes are markers for unhealthy diets: The presence of artificial food dyes is a clear sign of ultra-processed foods, which are independently associated with an increased cancer risk and other chronic diseases.

  • Safer natural alternatives are available: Consumers can reduce their intake of concerning synthetic dyes by opting for products colored with natural alternatives like beetroot, turmeric, or anthocyanins.

  • Regulatory action is underway: The FDA is phasing out the use of synthetic food dyes, including Red 40, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6, in the coming years due to growing health concerns.

In This Article

Red 3: The Dye with the Clearest Carcinogenic Link

Of all the synthetic food dyes, Red 3 (also known as Erythrosine) has the most conclusive link to cancer, at least in animal studies. As early as the 1980s, studies found that high doses of Red 3 led to an increased incidence of thyroid tumors in male rats. This finding eventually prompted the FDA to ban its use in cosmetics in 1990 under the Delaney Clause of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which prohibits the approval of any food or color additive found to cause cancer in humans or animals.

For over three decades, however, the FDA failed to extend this ban to food and oral drugs, allowing Red 3 to remain in products such as maraschino cherries, candy, and fruit cocktails. Following renewed pressure from consumer advocacy groups and legislative action in states like California, the FDA finally moved to ban Red 3 in food in early 2025, with a transition period for manufacturers.

Red 40 and Colorectal Cancer Concerns

Allura Red AC, commonly known as Red 40, is one of the most widely used synthetic food dyes in the world. While it has not been found to be carcinogenic in standard rodent assays at permitted dosages, newer research has raised significant concerns. A 2023 study published in Toxicology Reports found that Red 40 causes DNA damage and low-grade colonic inflammation in mice, potentially contributing to the development of early-onset colorectal cancer. Researchers note that the increased use of Red 40 in ultra-processed foods over the last few decades coincides with a rise in early-onset colorectal cancer cases, a troubling correlation.

Animal studies have also shown genotoxic effects from high doses of Red 40, leading to chromosomal abnormalities in some cases. These findings suggest potential long-term risks, especially for high-volume consumers of ultra-processed foods.

Concerns Over Contaminants in Yellow 5 and Yellow 6

Yellow 5 (Tartrazine) and Yellow 6 (Sunset Yellow FCF) are two other synthetic food dyes that have faced scrutiny, in part due to contamination from known carcinogens. Studies have revealed that both Yellow 5 and Yellow 6 can be contaminated with benzidine or other carcinogenic substances, though the FDA has historically maintained that the levels were too low to pose a significant risk. However, some research suggests that the benzidine levels might be higher than what is considered safe, raising ongoing concerns.

Beyond carcinogenic contaminants, Yellow 5 has also demonstrated genotoxic potential in some microbiological and rodent studies, where it was shown to cause DNA oxidative damage. While the direct link to human cancer is not established, the combination of potential carcinogenic contaminants and genotoxic effects makes these dyes a concern for long-term health.

A Comparison of Carcinogenic Potential in Synthetic Food Dyes

Food Dye Potential Carcinogenic Link Evidence Basis Regulatory Action (US)
Red 3 (Erythrosine) Confirmed carcinogen in animal studies (thyroid tumors). Animal studies (1980s) showed high doses caused thyroid cancer in male rats. Banned in food and ingested drugs (effective 2027).
Red 40 (Allura Red AC) Linked to DNA damage and inflammation in animal studies; potential contribution to early-onset colorectal cancer. Recent animal studies demonstrated DNA damage and inflammation in mice. Currently authorized, but FDA planning phase-out by late 2026.
Yellow 5 (Tartrazine) Concerns over carcinogenic contaminants like benzidine and genotoxicity in lab studies. Studies show contamination with carcinogens and positive genotoxicity results in some tests. Currently authorized, but FDA planning phase-out by late 2026.
Yellow 6 (Sunset Yellow) Concerns over carcinogenic contaminants like benzidine and potential tumor links in older animal tests. Contaminated with benzidine; older animal tests suggested adrenal and kidney tumors. Currently authorized, but FDA planning phase-out by late 2026.

Broader Concerns: The Case for a Whole Food Diet

Beyond the specific carcinogenic risks associated with individual dyes, a larger concern stems from the dietary patterns associated with their consumption. Artificial food dyes are predominantly found in ultra-processed foods, which are often high in added sugars, unhealthy fats, and refined carbohydrates. A diet heavy in these foods is independently linked to an increased risk of chronic diseases, including cancer. Therefore, even if an individual dye's specific cancer risk is debated or considered low, its presence serves as a clear marker for a less healthy overall dietary pattern.

Furthermore, many natural alternatives, such as beetroot extract, turmeric (curcumin), and anthocyanins from berries, offer vibrant colors without the synthetic risks. Some of these natural colorants even possess potential anti-cancer properties, offering a healthier way to add color to foods. Consumer pressure and regulatory changes are slowly pushing the food industry toward these safer alternatives. For instance, in April 2025, the FDA announced plans to end the use of the six remaining synthetic dyes in the US by the end of 2026, signaling a major shift in policy.

What This Means for Consumers

For consumers, this information highlights the importance of reading ingredient labels and making informed choices. While the risk from moderate consumption of individual dyes may be small, cumulative exposure over a lifetime, especially for children, raises legitimate health questions. The simplest and most effective strategy is to reduce consumption of highly processed foods and seek out products using natural colorants, or those that are dye-free. This approach not only minimizes exposure to potentially harmful artificial additives but also promotes a more nutrient-dense, whole-food diet that is beneficial for overall health and cancer prevention.

Conclusion

While some food dyes, notably Red 3, have a confirmed carcinogenic link in animal studies, the evidence for other common dyes like Red 40 and Yellow 5 is more nuanced, highlighting concerns over potential genotoxicity and carcinogenic contaminants. Regulatory agencies like the FDA are responding to this growing body of evidence and public pressure, culminating in the 2025 decision to phase out the remaining synthetic food dyes by the end of 2026. The broader context of ultra-processed food consumption, where these dyes are most prevalent, provides a compelling reason to shift towards a diet rich in whole foods and natural alternatives. By understanding which food dyes are carcinogenic or otherwise concerning, consumers can take proactive steps to reduce their intake and improve their long-term health.

For a deeper dive into the studies behind these food dye regulations, see the Center for Science in the Public Interest's report on synthetic food dyes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Red Dye 3 (Erythrosine) has been banned by the FDA for its carcinogenic link in animal studies. Other synthetic dyes, such as Red 40, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6, have also raised concerns due to potential genotoxic effects and contamination with carcinogenic chemicals.

Yes, in January 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finalized a ban on the use of Red Dye 3 in food and ingested drugs. Manufacturers must comply with the ban by January 2027.

While not banned, Yellow 5 (Tartrazine) and Yellow 6 (Sunset Yellow FCF) have been found to contain low levels of carcinogenic contaminants like benzidine. Some studies also indicate potential genotoxic effects, meaning they may cause DNA damage.

Recent animal studies have linked Red 40 (Allura Red AC) to DNA damage and colonic inflammation, raising concerns about its potential role in early-onset colorectal cancer. The FDA is phasing out Red 40 and other synthetic dyes by the end of 2026, suggesting the agency no longer considers it entirely safe.

The most effective way to avoid synthetic food dyes is to read ingredient labels and choose whole, unprocessed foods. Look for products that use natural colorants like beetroot, annatto, or turmeric instead, or opt for dye-free versions.

Artificial food dyes are most common in ultra-processed foods, which are independently associated with an increased risk of cancer and other chronic diseases. Reducing your intake of these foods, rather than just focusing on dyes, is a proven strategy for better health.

Natural dyes are generally considered safer and often provide health benefits, such as antioxidant properties. However, even natural additives should be consumed in moderation as part of a balanced diet, and some natural sources like carmine can cause allergic reactions in sensitive individuals.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.