Skip to content

Which K2 is best, MK-4 or MK-7? An In-Depth Comparative Guide

3 min read

Studies show that while MK-4 and MK-7 are both forms of Vitamin K2, MK-7 exhibits superior bioavailability and a longer half-life in the bloodstream. When comparing which K2 is best, MK-4 or MK-7, understanding these key differences is vital for optimizing your bone and cardiovascular health.

Quick Summary

A detailed comparison of vitamin K2 forms, MK-4 and MK-7, focusing on their distinct sources, half-life, and bioavailability to help determine the best supplemental choice for bone and heart health.

Key Points

  • Bioavailability: MK-7 has significantly higher bioavailability and a longer half-life than MK-4, circulating in the blood for approximately 72 hours compared to just a few hours for MK-4.

  • Dosing: Due to its poor absorption, nutritional doses of MK-4 are not effective, while much smaller, once-daily doses of MK-7 are highly effective.

  • Sources: MK-4 is found in animal products, while MK-7 is primarily found in fermented foods like natto.

  • Systemic Distribution: MK-7's long half-life allows it to better reach extrahepatic tissues like bones and arteries, providing more consistent support for bone density and cardiovascular health.

  • Tissue Conversion: The body can convert MK-7 into the MK-4 form directly within tissues, making MK-7 an efficient supplier for the body's specific MK-4 needs.

  • Clinical Evidence: Clinical trials suggest MK-7 is superior for extrahepatic health markers, whereas MK-4 often requires pharmacological, not nutritional, doses to show an effect.

In This Article

Understanding Vitamin K2: The Foundation

Vitamin K is a group of fat-soluble vitamins essential for a variety of bodily functions. The two primary forms are K1 (phylloquinone), found in leafy greens, and K2 (menaquinone), which includes several subtypes, most notably MK-4 and MK-7. While K1 is crucial for blood clotting, K2 plays a more significant role in regulating calcium metabolism, directing it to bones and away from arteries.

The Chemical Difference: Short-Chain vs. Long-Chain

The fundamental difference between MK-4 and MK-7 lies in their chemical structure. They are both menaquinones, but the number in their name refers to the length of their side chain, or "tail," made of isoprene units. MK-4 has a short side chain (4 units), while MK-7 has a longer side chain (7 units). This structural distinction dramatically impacts how the body absorbs and utilizes each form.

Natural Sources: Where to Find MK-4 and MK-7

The natural dietary sources for these two vitamin K2 forms differ significantly. MK-4 is found predominantly in animal products, including eggs, meat, and high-fat dairy from grass-fed animals. In the body, MK-4 is also endogenously produced through the conversion of other vitamin K forms. On the other hand, MK-7 is produced by bacteria during fermentation. The most abundant and well-known source is natto, a traditional Japanese food made from fermented soybeans. Cheeses and other fermented foods also contain some MK-7, though in lower concentrations.

Bioavailability, Half-Life, and Efficacy

This is where the debate over which K2 is best, MK-4 or MK-7, really heats up. The longer side chain of MK-7 results in dramatically different pharmacokinetic properties compared to MK-4.

  • Absorption and Transport: MK-4 is typically absorbed into triglycerides and has a very short half-life of just a few hours. Because of this, it's cleared from the bloodstream quickly and requires multiple daily doses to maintain sufficient levels. In contrast, MK-7 is packaged into cholesterol and circulates in the blood for much longer, with a half-life of approximately 72 hours.
  • Extrahepatic Availability: The longer half-life of MK-7 allows it to reach tissues outside the liver, such as bones and blood vessels, more effectively. This makes it particularly important for extrahepatic functions like preventing arterial calcification and supporting bone health.
  • Dosing: Due to its superior bioavailability and stability, MK-7 is effective at much smaller, daily nutritional doses, typically in the microgram range (e.g., 90-180 µg/day). MK-4 requires much higher, often pharmacological, doses (milligrams) to achieve therapeutic effects, and even then, may be cleared too rapidly.

Functions Beyond Calcium Regulation

While both forms activate key proteins involved in calcium metabolism, research points to other specific functions. MK-4 acts as a ligand for the SXR/PXR receptor, a different mechanism from the gamma-carboxylation pathway. This may indicate unique physiological roles for MK-4, but because the body can convert MK-7 into MK-4 in extrahepatic tissues, MK-7 can be considered a better overall supplier.

Comparison Table: MK-4 vs. MK-7

Feature MK-4 MK-7
Natural Source Animal products (meat, dairy) Fermented foods (natto, some cheeses)
Half-Life in Blood Very short (approx. 2-6 hours) Very long (approx. 72 hours)
Bioavailability Poor at nutritional doses, high doses needed for effect High, well-absorbed at nutritional doses
Typical Dose Milligram range (1.5-45 mg) Microgram range (90-180 µg)
Frequency Needs multiple daily doses for stable levels Once-daily dosing is effective
Main Role Activates liver proteins (clotting factors) and converted in tissues; requires high doses for extrahepatic activity Provides long-term, systemic support for extrahepatic tissues (bones, arteries)
Overall Efficacy Can be effective at high doses, but bioavailability is poor at typical nutritional levels Superior bioavailability and accumulation lead to higher efficacy for bone and cardiovascular health

Conclusion: The Verdict on Which K2 is Best, MK-4 or MK-7

Based on decades of research, MK-7 stands out as the superior supplemental form for most people seeking vitamin K2's benefits. Its high bioavailability, long half-life, and ability to accumulate effectively in non-liver tissues—such as bones and arteries—make it the more efficient choice for promoting long-term bone density and cardiovascular health. While MK-4 is the biologically active form found in the body, it is poorly absorbed from dietary supplements at nutritional doses. The body can and does produce MK-4 from other forms, including MK-7, in the tissues where it is needed. For reliable, once-daily support for extrahepatic health, supplemental MK-7 is the clear winner. Individuals taking blood thinners like warfarin should consult a doctor before supplementing with any form of vitamin K2, as it can interfere with medication.

Understanding the Differences Between Vitamin K1 and Vitamin K2

Frequently Asked Questions

MK-7 is considered the superior form for bone health. Its longer half-life and higher bioavailability mean it can more effectively activate osteocalcin, a protein that directs calcium to your bones.

MK-7 is better for heart health. It effectively activates Matrix Gla Protein (MGP), which helps prevent arterial calcification, a key factor in cardiovascular disease.

Effective doses of MK-7 are much smaller, often in the 90-180 microgram range per day. In contrast, MK-4 is poorly absorbed at nutritional levels and often requires much higher, milligram-range doses to be effective.

While MK-4 is found in some animal products, it is often not absorbed well from food sources. MK-7 is abundant in natto, but this is not a staple in most Western diets. Therefore, supplementation is often more effective for boosting K2 levels.

Yes. Vitamin K is a fat-soluble vitamin. Taking your supplement with a meal containing some fat will significantly improve its absorption.

Yes. The body is capable of converting other forms of vitamin K, including K1 and MK-7, into MK-4 in various tissues. This is why MK-7 is considered an efficient way to supply the body with MK-4.

No. Vitamin K in any form, including MK-7, can interfere with blood-thinning medications like warfarin. If you are on anticoagulants, you must consult your doctor before taking any form of vitamin K2.

MK-7 is more popular in supplements because of its superior bioavailability, longer half-life, and ability to provide a consistent supply of K2 to extrahepatic tissues at low, once-daily dosages, making it a more practical choice for long-term health.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.