Skip to content

Which of the following patients are appropriate candidates for parenteral nutrition?

4 min read

Malnutrition is alarmingly common among hospitalized patients, particularly those with conditions affecting their digestive system. For these individuals, a doctor must determine which of the following patients are appropriate candidates for parenteral nutrition, a method of delivering vital nutrients intravenously when oral or enteral feeding is not possible or adequate.

Quick Summary

This article discusses the medical conditions and circumstances that qualify individuals for parenteral nutrition, a feeding method bypassing the digestive system to provide complete nourishment intravenously.

Key Points

  • Intestinal Failure: Patients with short bowel syndrome or intestinal failure are primary candidates for parenteral nutrition.

  • Prolonged Bowel Rest: PN is appropriate for patients with severe gastrointestinal diseases like IBD or pancreatitis who require extended periods of bowel rest.

  • Hypercatabolic States: Severely ill or injured patients, such as those with sepsis or major trauma, often need PN to meet high metabolic demands.

  • Inadequate Enteral Intake: When enteral or oral nutrition is not possible or sufficient to meet caloric needs, PN becomes necessary.

  • Functional GI Tract: Patients with a functional and accessible GI tract are generally not candidates for PN, as enteral feeding is safer and cheaper.

  • Contraindications: PN should be avoided in metabolically unstable patients or those requiring only short-term support.

  • Team Decision: The decision for PN is complex and should be made by a multidisciplinary nutrition support team.

In This Article

Understanding Parenteral Nutrition (PN)

Parenteral nutrition (PN) involves delivering nutrients intravenously, bypassing the entire digestive tract. It is a critical form of medical support for patients who cannot consume or absorb nutrients adequately through the oral or enteral route. PN can be either partial (PPN), supplementing other forms of intake, or total (TPN), providing all of a patient’s nutritional needs. PN solutions are customized mixtures containing water, carbohydrates, proteins, fats, vitamins, and minerals. Patient selection for PN is a crucial, multidisciplinary decision based on the patient's underlying condition, nutritional status, and overall health goals.

Primary Candidates for Parenteral Nutrition

PN is indicated for patients with intestinal failure, severe gastrointestinal dysfunction, or those requiring prolonged bowel rest. These conditions impair the gut's ability to digest food and absorb nutrients, making intravenous delivery necessary.

Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS)

SBS results from a massive surgical resection of the small intestine, leading to a significant reduction in nutrient absorption. Patients with severe SBS often require long-term or lifelong PN to maintain nutritional status. This is one of the most common indications for home parenteral nutrition (HPN).

Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)

In severe exacerbations of Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis, inflammation and damage to the intestinal mucosa can lead to malabsorption, intractable diarrhea, and the formation of high-output fistulas. PN provides nutritional support and allows for complete bowel rest, which can aid in healing.

Gastrointestinal (GI) Motility Disorders

Conditions like intestinal pseudo-obstruction or severe scleroderma can impair the normal muscular contractions of the GI tract, leading to a failure to tolerate oral or enteral feeding. PN ensures consistent nutrient delivery, bypassing the motility problem.

Perioperative and Critical Care Situations

Critically ill patients in hypercatabolic states—such as those with severe burns, sepsis, or major trauma—have increased metabolic demands. If they cannot tolerate enteral feeding, PN is initiated to prevent muscle wasting and support recovery. Similarly, after major abdominal surgeries, patients may experience a prolonged paralytic ileus, requiring temporary PN until bowel function returns.

Other Specific Conditions

A variety of other medical issues can necessitate PN, including high-output enterocutaneous fistulas, severe pancreatitis requiring bowel rest, certain congenital GI anomalies in infants, and cases of intractable vomiting or diarrhea. Patients undergoing radiation or chemotherapy for gastrointestinal cancers that lead to severe mucositis or obstruction may also be candidates for PN.

Contraindications for Parenteral Nutrition

Not all patients are appropriate candidates for parenteral nutrition. Its use is generally contraindicated when a patient's gastrointestinal tract is functioning and accessible. In such cases, enteral nutrition (tube feeding) is the preferred method, as it is associated with fewer complications and costs. Other contraindications include:

  • Patients who are well-nourished and only require short-term nutritional support (e.g., less than 7 days).
  • Patients with critical metabolic instability that needs to be corrected first, such as severe hyperglycemia.
  • Patients for whom PN would only serve to prolong an inevitable, poor outcome without improving the quality of life.
  • The absence of reliable and safe venous access for catheter placement.

Enteral vs. Parenteral Nutrition: A Comparison

Feature Enteral Nutrition (EN) Parenteral Nutrition (PN)
Delivery Route Directly into the gastrointestinal tract (stomach or small intestine) via a tube. Directly into the bloodstream via an intravenous (IV) catheter.
Gut Function Requires a functional and accessible GI tract. Bypasses the GI tract; used when the gut is non-functional or requires rest.
Cost Generally less expensive. More expensive due to specialized formula and administration equipment.
Complications Lower risk of infection; can cause feeding intolerance or aspiration. Higher risk of catheter-related infections (CRBSI), metabolic complications, and liver dysfunction.
Physiological Benefits Better preserves the gut barrier function and reduces infectious risk. Restores nutritional status and promotes a positive nitrogen balance.

The Decision-Making Process for PN

The decision to initiate PN is complex and requires careful consideration by a multidisciplinary nutrition support team, which often includes a doctor, registered dietitian, pharmacist, and nurse. Factors influencing the decision include:

  • Patient assessment: Thorough evaluation of the patient's nutritional status, including BMI, weight loss history, and recent intake.
  • Clinical status: Evaluation of the underlying disease severity, anticipated duration of intestinal failure, and presence of any contraindications.
  • Risk assessment: Careful weighing of the risks associated with PN, such as infection and metabolic issues, against the benefits of nutritional support.
  • Timing of initiation: Clinical guidelines generally recommend initiating PN in malnourished patients as soon as feasible, especially if they cannot tolerate enteral feeding. For well-nourished patients, PN may be delayed up to 7 days to determine if oral or enteral intake will resume.
  • Access: Assessing the feasibility and safety of placing a central venous catheter for long-term PN administration.

Long-Term Considerations

For patients with chronic intestinal failure, home parenteral nutrition (HPN) allows for the continuation of therapy outside the hospital. This requires comprehensive patient and caregiver training on catheter care and administration. For some, HPN can extend life and improve quality of life significantly, though it comes with long-term risks like liver disease and bone demineralization. The ultimate goal is to transition patients back to oral or enteral feeding whenever possible to mitigate the risks associated with long-term PN.

Conclusion

Determining which of the following patients are appropriate candidates for parenteral nutrition involves a detailed clinical assessment and team-based approach. PN is a life-saving therapy reserved for patients with non-functional or inaccessible gastrointestinal tracts, including those with severe intestinal failure, complications from surgery, or in critical hypercatabolic states. However, it is an invasive procedure with risks, and enteral nutrition is always preferred if the gut is functional. Proper patient selection and careful, ongoing monitoring are essential to maximize benefits and minimize the potential for serious complications. For more in-depth information, authoritative resources like the National Institutes of Health provide further reading on TPN and its applications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) provides all of a patient's caloric and nutritional needs intravenously, while partial parenteral nutrition (PPN) is a supplementary feeding method that provides some nutrients while the patient receives additional feeding from another source.

Parenteral nutrition can be used for both short-term and long-term care, depending on the patient's condition. Short-term use is common after surgery or during acute illness, while long-term or home PN (HPN) is used for chronic conditions like intestinal failure.

The risks of parenteral nutrition include infection from the intravenous catheter, metabolic imbalances (like high or low blood sugar), blood clots, liver dysfunction, and bone disease with long-term use.

It depends on the type and purpose of the PN. Patients on PPN can often eat by mouth to supplement their diet. For those on TPN, eating by mouth is typically not possible, especially during periods requiring complete bowel rest.

A multidisciplinary team, including physicians, dietitians, and pharmacists, evaluates the patient's nutritional status, GI function, and overall health. They compare the risks and benefits of PN against other feeding options to make a decision.

Transitioning off PN is a gradual process that begins when the patient's digestive function improves. The healthcare team will slowly introduce oral or enteral feeding while decreasing the PN infusion to prevent issues like refeeding syndrome.

When the gut is functional, enteral nutrition is preferred because it is less invasive, less expensive, carries a lower risk of infection, and helps preserve the natural function and health of the intestinal mucosa.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.