The Origins of Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs)
The journey toward modern dietary recommendations began long before they were formalized. Early nutrition science in the late 19th and early 20th centuries saw researchers like Voit and Rubner establish basic reference values for energy and protein based on population surveys. However, a more systematic approach was needed, especially as nutrient-deficiency diseases were identified.
The official process in the United States began in the early 1940s. With World War II underway, the US government recognized the need for nutritional standards for national defense efforts and food assistance programs. This led to the creation of the Food and Nutrition Board (FNB) within the National Academy of Sciences, which was tasked with establishing nutritional guidance for the population. In 1941, the FNB published the first edition of the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs), providing standards for calories and nine essential nutrients.
The Evolution to Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs)
Over the decades, the RDAs were periodically revised to reflect new scientific knowledge. However, the scope of the recommendations expanded beyond simply preventing nutrient deficiencies to addressing the role of diet in reducing the risk of chronic diseases. By the mid-1990s, the FNB, in collaboration with Health Canada, initiated a comprehensive effort to revise and expand the standards, resulting in the introduction of the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) in 1997.
The DRI system represents a significant leap forward, providing a more sophisticated and flexible set of values for planning and assessing nutrient intakes. The framework includes four distinct categories, each serving a unique purpose:
- Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA): The average daily intake level sufficient to meet the nutrient requirements of nearly all (97–98 percent) healthy individuals in a particular life stage and gender group.
- Estimated Average Requirement (EAR): The daily intake value estimated to meet the requirements of half of the healthy individuals in a life stage and gender group.
- Adequate Intake (AI): A value based on experimentally determined or observed average nutrient intake by a group of healthy people. It is used when there is insufficient evidence to establish an EAR and subsequently an RDA.
- Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL): The highest average daily intake level that is likely to pose no risk of adverse health effects for nearly all individuals in the general population.
These values are developed by expert committees and are based on a review of scientific evidence. They serve as the foundation for various public health policies, nutrition education programs, and food labeling regulations.
The Global Perspective: WHO and FAO
On a global scale, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) collaborate to establish global nutrient requirements and promote healthy eating. These organizations serve as a vital resource for countries worldwide, especially those that lack the resources for their own extensive research.
International dietary standards are crucial for:
- Providing a scientific basis for developing national food-based dietary guidelines.
- Assisting in the planning of food supplies and nutrition policies, especially in developing nations.
- Informing nutrition education programs globally.
- Guiding the development of products in the food industry.
While some countries adopt WHO and FAO recommendations directly, many use them as a foundation for their own national standards. The WHO also publishes specific guidance, such as fact sheets on healthy diets, emphasizing nutrient-dense foods and appropriate intake levels.
DRI vs. Historical Standards: A Comparison
| Feature | Historical Standards (e.g., early RDAs) | Modern DRIs | 
|---|---|---|
| Primary Goal | Prevent nutrient-deficiency diseases (e.g., scurvy, rickets). | Prevent deficiency, avoid excess, and reduce risk of chronic disease. | 
| Reference Values | Primarily focused on the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA). | Four distinct reference values: RDA, EAR, AI, and UL. | 
| Basis for Estimates | Based on available, sometimes limited, scientific data from observational studies and experiments. | More sophisticated process based on a thorough review of extensive and evolving scientific evidence. | 
| Scope of Application | Primarily used for planning food supplies and interpreting consumption data. | Used for broader public health policies, food labeling, and dietary assessment for individuals and groups. | 
| Considerations | Often lacked specific guidance on fats, sugars, and overall energy intake. | Includes recommendations for macronutrients and considers the role of diet in preventing chronic diseases. | 
The Continuous Evolution of Nutritional Science
The recommendations for dietary intake are not static; they are dynamic guidelines that are periodically reviewed and refined as new scientific evidence emerges. The process involves extensive research, expert committee reviews, and input from various health and nutrition communities. The DRI reports, published by the National Academies, document these updates and provide the scientific rationale for the changes.
The continuous reassessment of nutrient needs reflects our deepening understanding of human physiology, health, and the complexities of diet. From the initial wartime effort to the modern focus on chronic disease prevention, the recommendations represent a living document of nutritional science.
Conclusion: The Importance of Independent Recommendations
In conclusion, the question of who recommended dietary intake is best answered by pointing to authoritative, science-based bodies like the Food and Nutrition Board and the international organizations WHO and FAO. These entities provide the rigorous, independent assessments that form the bedrock of dietary guidelines in many countries. The evolution from simple deficiency-prevention standards (RDAs) to the multi-faceted DRI framework reflects a maturation of nutritional science, helping to guide public health policy and empower individuals to make informed dietary choices. Understanding the source and scientific basis of these recommendations is crucial for appreciating their importance in promoting overall health and preventing disease.
For more detailed information on the development and use of dietary standards in the US and Canada, readers can explore the National Academies Press resources.