Skip to content

Why Should Iron Not Be Given During Infection?

4 min read

During an infection, the human body's iron metabolism changes dramatically, a survival strategy that has evolved over millennia. This process, known as 'nutritional immunity,' is the primary reason why should iron not be given during infection.

Quick Summary

The body deliberately withholds iron during an infection by raising hepcidin levels to starve pathogens of this essential nutrient. Supplementing with iron can counteract this natural defense mechanism, potentially worsening the infection and aiding microbial growth.

Key Points

  • Nutritional Immunity: The body actively sequesters iron during infection to prevent pathogens from accessing this essential nutrient for growth.

  • Role of Hepcidin: Inflammation triggers the release of the hormone hepcidin, which limits iron absorption and locks iron in storage, reducing blood iron levels.

  • Fueling Pathogens: Providing supplemental iron during infection can bypass the body's iron-withholding defense, potentially fueling microbial replication and worsening the illness.

  • Increased Virulence: Excess iron, especially non-transferrin-bound iron, can enhance the virulence of certain bacteria, leading to more severe infections in susceptible individuals.

  • Impaired Immune Function: High iron levels can impair the function of key immune cells like phagocytes and lymphocytes, compromising the host's ability to fight off pathogens.

  • Oxidative Stress: Free iron promotes the production of harmful free radicals, which can cause significant cellular and tissue damage during severe infections.

  • Consideration for Treatment: Deciding on iron supplementation during illness requires balancing the risks of fueling infection against the potential benefits of treating iron-deficiency anemia.

In This Article

The Host's Clever Defense: Nutritional Immunity

Limiting Microbial Growth

Iron is a vital nutrient for nearly all living organisms, including the bacteria and other pathogens that cause infections. Without a sufficient iron supply, these microbes cannot proliferate or produce the virulence factors they need to cause disease. To exploit this weakness, the human body has developed a sophisticated defense mechanism called nutritional immunity.

When an infection begins, the immune system orchestrates a response that actively reduces the availability of iron in the bloodstream and at the site of infection. This is achieved by increasing the production of the hormone hepcidin, which acts as the body's 'master iron regulator'. High hepcidin levels cause the body to:

  • Reduce iron absorption: It inhibits the protein ferroportin, which is responsible for exporting iron from intestinal cells into the bloodstream, thus decreasing dietary iron uptake.
  • Trap stored iron: It blocks the release of iron from storage sites, such as the liver and macrophages, effectively locking it away from invading pathogens.

This process results in a state of hypoferremia, or low plasma iron, which is a key part of the acute-phase response to infection. By making iron scarce, the body starves the pathogens and helps to contain the infection.

The Danger of Exogenous Iron

Introducing supplemental iron during an active infection can bypass the body's natural defense mechanisms. Oral or intravenous iron can saturate the body's iron-binding proteins, such as transferrin, leading to an increase in free, non-transferrin-bound iron (NTBI). This free iron is readily available for opportunistic pathogens to scavenge and use for their own growth and replication. For example, studies have shown that in patients with iron overload conditions like hemochromatosis, certain bacteria like Yersinia enterocolitica and Vibrio vulnificus can cause severe, life-threatening infections. Providing supplemental iron during an infection risks inadvertently providing fuel for the very enemy the body is trying to starve.

The Role of Hepcidin in Acute and Chronic Infection

During an infection, the body experiences a state of increased inflammation. Pro-inflammatory cytokines, especially interleukin-6 (IL-6), are released and trigger a sharp increase in hepcidin production by the liver. This rapid increase in hepcidin and subsequent hypoferremia is a critical host defense mechanism. However, in chronic infections or inflammatory diseases, persistently high hepcidin levels can lead to a condition known as 'anemia of inflammation' or 'anemia of chronic disease'. In this state, the body has plenty of iron in storage (high ferritin) but cannot release it for use in producing red blood cells due to the iron-blocking action of hepcidin (low serum iron).

Risks of Iron Supplementation During Infection

Factor Impact of Excess Iron During Infection Impact of Withholding Iron During Infection
Microbial Growth Provides essential nutrient for pathogens, potentially increasing virulence and promoting replication. Deprives pathogens of a critical growth factor, hindering their ability to multiply.
Host Immune Function Can impair the function of immune cells, including phagocytes and T-lymphocytes, compromising the body's ability to fight off infection. Supports the host's innate immune response, including the antimicrobial effects of various immune cells and proteins like lactoferrin.
Free Radical Damage Promotes the Fenton reaction, leading to increased production of toxic hydroxyl radicals and causing cellular and tissue damage, particularly in severe infections like sepsis. Prevents the increase of damaging free radicals caused by excess iron, protecting the host's cells from oxidative stress.
Clinical Outcome Associated with increased risk and severity of infection, especially in vulnerable populations or those with underlying iron overload disorders. Aligns with the body's natural defense mechanisms, potentially leading to better control of the infection.

The Iron and Infection Paradox

The relationship between iron and infection is complex. While iron is a necessary nutrient, its availability must be tightly controlled during illness. The body's innate wisdom is to sequester iron to create a hostile environment for pathogens. This is a delicate balance, as prolonged and severe iron restriction can also impair host resistance. However, the acute inflammatory response prioritizes starving the invading microorganisms. Giving supplemental iron during this critical phase can override this natural defense mechanism and, in some cases, worsen the infection. This highlights why medical decisions regarding iron therapy, especially in cases of active infection, must be made with careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits. In malaria-endemic areas, for instance, iron supplementation has been associated with an increased risk of severe malaria, and its use is managed with strict protocols to avoid exacerbating the disease.

Conclusion

The practice of withholding iron during infection is rooted in the fundamental principle of nutritional immunity. The body's acute inflammatory response naturally restricts iron to inhibit pathogen growth. Supplementing with iron during this phase provides a vital resource to the invading microbes, potentially leading to a more severe and prolonged illness. While iron is an essential mineral for overall health, its administration during active infection can have serious, adverse consequences. Medical guidelines and the body's own defense mechanisms converge on the same conclusion: during an infection, iron is a double-edged sword, and it is safest to allow the body's evolved defenses to run their course before restoring iron levels. Careful assessment of the patient's overall condition is critical, and in many cases, delaying iron therapy until the acute infection has resolved is the most prudent course of action.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary risk is that supplemental iron can overcome the body's natural defense mechanism of nutritional immunity. This provides an essential growth nutrient to invading pathogens, potentially making the infection more severe or prolonging its duration.

The body hides iron by increasing the production of the hormone hepcidin. Hepcidin reduces the absorption of new iron and blocks the release of iron from storage sites in the liver and immune cells, effectively reducing the amount of iron available in the bloodstream for pathogens.

This defense mechanism is a general response to many types of infections, particularly those caused by bacteria that require iron for growth. However, the specific risks and body's response can vary depending on the pathogen and the severity of the illness.

Individuals with iron overload, such as those with hereditary hemochromatosis, are at a higher risk of severe infections from certain bacteria, including Yersinia enterocolitica and Vibrio vulnificus. Their already high iron levels can provide a fertile environment for these pathogens.

Yes, excess iron can compromise the function of immune cells, including phagocytes and lymphocytes, which are essential for fighting infection. Iron overload can suppress the immune response, making the body less effective at clearing pathogens.

If you have iron-deficiency anemia and develop an infection, it is best to consult a healthcare provider. The standard medical approach is often to withhold iron supplementation during the active infection and resume it once the infection has resolved. The priority is to treat the infection first.

Receiving intravenous iron during a severe infection like sepsis can be particularly dangerous. The excess iron can exacerbate inflammation, promote bacterial growth, and increase oxidative stress, potentially worsening the patient's condition and increasing mortality risk.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.