Skip to content

Are Coco Pops reduced sugar? The definitive guide to the new recipe

4 min read

Back in 2018, Kellogg's significantly reduced the sugar content in its popular Coco Pops cereal by 40% in the UK, a move that surprised many consumers. So, are Coco Pops reduced sugar? The answer is a clear yes, but understanding the details reveals a more complex picture across different markets and product variations.

Quick Summary

This article details Kellogg's initiative to reduce sugar in Coco Pops and its various product formulations. We explore how the recipe has changed, compare sugar levels across different versions and regions, and discuss the impact on taste and nutritional value. The content also addresses common consumer questions regarding the reformulation.

Key Points

  • Significant Sugar Reduction: In the UK, Coco Pops were reformulated in 2018 with a 40% reduction in sugar content.

  • Market Variations: The sugar reduction is not consistent globally, with some markets offering special reduced-sugar variants like Coco Pops Chocos.

  • Formulation Changes: The new recipe includes more premium cocoa powder to maintain flavour without relying on excessive sugar.

  • Improved Nutritional Profile: The reformulation helped Coco Pops move out of the 'high in fat, salt, or sugar' (HFSS) category in the UK.

  • Still a Treat: Despite the reduction, nutritionists advise that Coco Pops should be consumed in moderation due to its overall nutritional composition.

  • Positive Reception: Taste tests indicate that many consumers, including children, enjoy the lower sugar recipe.

In This Article

The Coco Pops Sugar Reduction Initiative

Facing growing public and regulatory pressure to address childhood obesity, Kellogg's, like many food manufacturers, embarked on a significant reformulation of its cereals. The most prominent of these efforts was the sweeping reduction of sugar in Coco Pops, a beloved but historically high-sugar breakfast cereal. In a widely reported 2018 move in the UK, Kellogg's cut the sugar in its original Coco Pops by 40%, dropping the per-100g amount from 30g to 17g. This was not a standalone effort but part of a multi-stage plan that had seen sugar reduced by 14% the previous year. The reformulation also removed artificial preservatives and sweeteners, replacing them with a more premium cocoa powder to retain the iconic flavour. This UK change was significant enough to push Coco Pops out of the 'high in fat, salt, or sugar' (HFSS) category.

Global variations and new products

The sugar reduction in Coco Pops isn't uniform across the globe, and Kellogg's has also introduced new variants with different nutritional profiles. For instance, in other markets like Australia, products such as Coco Pops Chocos have been released, specifically promoting 25% less sugar than the original recipe in that region. These variations mean that consumers must check the nutritional information on the packaging specific to their country. The company's 'Better Starts Plan' and 'Wellbeing Manifesto' underpin these product changes, signalling a long-term commitment to improving the health credentials of its range.

The reformulation process: How was sugar reduced?

The process of reducing sugar in a product like Coco Pops is a complex balancing act. The challenge for food developers is to reduce the sugar content without negatively impacting the taste that has made the cereal a favourite for decades. To achieve this, Kellogg's replaced some of the sugar with a high-quality cocoa powder, which provides a more robust chocolate flavour and reduces the reliance on sweetness alone. The absence of artificial sweeteners was also a key part of the new recipe in some regions. Kellogg's undertook extensive taste tests, reporting high approval ratings for the new recipe, even from their target child audience.

Comparison: Original vs. Reduced Sugar Coco Pops

Feature Original Coco Pops (Pre-2018 UK) Current Coco Pops (UK Recipe) Coco Pops Chocos (AU Recipe)
Sugar per 100g 30g 17g ~26g (based on older data; Chocos are 25% lower than AU Original)
Sweeteners Sugar Sugar, more premium cocoa Sugar
Preservatives Contained artificial ones No artificial preservatives Varies by market
Taste Profile Very sweet, classic chocolate flavour Slightly less sweet, stronger cocoa notes Delicious, very chocolatey
Market UK, prior to 2018 UK Australia
Nutri-Score Not applicable Improved nutritional rating (non-HFSS) 4 Health Stars (AUS)

Are Coco Pops still a healthy breakfast choice?

While the sugar reduction is a positive step, nutritionists advise that Coco Pops should still be considered an occasional treat rather than a daily staple. The cereal, even in its reduced-sugar form, remains relatively high in sugar compared to other breakfast options and low in protein and fibre. It is primarily a rice-based cereal, which means it provides simple carbohydrates. Health experts often suggest pairing it with other foods, like fresh fruit or yogurt, to create a more balanced meal. Ultimately, while it is healthier than its original version, it does not stand up to the nutritional profile of a high-fibre, low-sugar cereal. For consumers aiming for a healthier breakfast, many alternatives are available, and Coco Pops should be enjoyed in moderation.

The consumer response and long-term outlook

The consumer response to the reduced sugar Coco Pops has been mixed but largely positive, especially concerning the taste. Kellogg's reported that taste tests showed nearly 85% of children loved the new recipe as much as the old one. However, some online conversations reveal a nostalgia for the sweeter original, while others appreciate the move towards healthier options. Kellogg's continues to introduce new variations and expand its product line, showcasing the ongoing evolution of the cereal market driven by consumer demand for healthier choices.

Conclusion

Yes, Coco Pops are reduced sugar, thanks to a significant reformulation by Kellogg's in response to health concerns. However, the extent of the reduction and the specific product variants can differ depending on the region. Consumers should always check local packaging for the most accurate nutritional information. While the cereal is healthier than it once was, it is still not considered a highly nutritious daily breakfast by many dietitians and is best enjoyed as an occasional treat. The move represents a broader industry trend towards more health-conscious products, but the classic chocolate flavour remains at the core of the Coco Pops experience.

Can I still find the original, high-sugar Coco Pops?

No, the original high-sugar formula of Coco Pops has been phased out and is no longer produced by Kellogg's in the UK and many other regions. The newer, reduced-sugar versions are now the standard.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, Kellogg's significantly reduced the sugar content in its Coco Pops cereal. The UK recipe saw a 40% reduction in sugar between 2017 and 2018.

According to Kellogg's taste tests, a high percentage of children liked the new, lower sugar recipe just as much as the old one. The company worked to maintain the flavour using higher-quality cocoa.

Yes, Kellogg's offers different Coco Pops products with varying nutritional profiles across different regions. For example, some markets have variants like Coco Pops Chocos, which specifically advertise a lower sugar content than the regional original.

In the UK, the current recipe contains 17g of sugar per 100g. However, this can vary by country, so it's best to check the nutritional information on the local packaging.

While the sugar reduction is a positive change, dietitians still suggest viewing Coco Pops as more of a treat than a highly nutritious daily breakfast, as it remains high in sugar relative to other options and lower in fiber and protein.

No, according to the 2018 announcement for the UK market, the new recipe included a more premium cocoa powder and did not add artificial preservatives or sweeteners to compensate for the sugar reduction.

Kellogg's reduced the sugar in response to growing health concerns regarding childhood obesity and pressure from health groups and government regulations. The initiative was part of their broader 'Better Starts Plan'.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.