Skip to content

Are Tenderloins Less Calories Than Breasts? A Full Nutritional Breakdown

6 min read

According to the USDA, a 3.5-ounce serving of cooked, skinless chicken breast contains approximately 165 calories, while some sources indicate that chicken tenderloins may contain fewer calories per serving, but this can be misleading. Understanding the complete nutritional profile is key to answering the question: are tenderloins less calories than breasts?

Quick Summary

This article provides a comprehensive comparison of chicken tenderloins and chicken breasts, examining their calorie count, protein, fat, and other nutritional components. The analysis helps clarify which cut is the better option for different dietary needs and cooking preferences.

Key Points

  • Tenderloins have marginally fewer calories per gram: A 100g serving of skinless chicken tenderloin is slightly lower in calories than the same size serving of skinless chicken breast.

  • Cooking method is the main calorie differentiator: The way you cook either cut—frying versus grilling—will have a much larger impact on the final calorie content than the small difference between the raw cuts.

  • Breasts offer a higher protein density: Per 100 grams, chicken breasts contain a higher amount of protein, which is excellent for muscle repair and promoting satiety.

  • Tenderloins are generally more expensive: Due to being a smaller, single muscle cut, tenderloins have a higher per-pound cost than the larger chicken breasts.

  • Both are healthy, lean protein sources: For those prioritizing low-fat, high-protein meals, both cuts are suitable options as long as they are prepared with health-conscious methods.

  • Fat and sodium content differ slightly: Tenderloins can have a slightly higher fat and sodium content naturally, though both cuts are generally low in these aspects compared to other meats.

In This Article

Tenderloin vs. Breast: A Nutritional Deep Dive

When it comes to lean protein, chicken is a staple in many diets. But shoppers often face a choice between two popular cuts: the tenderloin and the breast. The question of whether are tenderloins less calories than breasts is common, yet the answer requires looking beyond just the raw calorie count. Both are white meat and high in protein, but subtle nutritional differences, as well as variations in preparation, can impact their final calorie content. This article will break down the nutritional facts and help you determine which cut best fits your dietary goals.

The Anatomy of Chicken Cuts

To understand the nutritional differences, it helps to know where each cut comes from. The chicken breast is the large, central muscle on the chicken's chest. It is a dense, thick piece of meat, popular for its low fat content and versatility. The tenderloin, on the other hand, is a smaller, more delicate muscle strip located underneath the breast, close to the breastbone. It is naturally more tender, a quality that is reflected in its name.

Comparing Raw Nutritional Values

While nutritional information can vary slightly between brands and processing, general data from sources like Healthline or the USDA provides a reliable comparison for boneless, skinless cuts. Based on a 3.5-ounce (100-gram) serving, the differences are revealing:

  • Chicken Breast (Cooked, Skinless): Approximately 165 calories, 31 grams of protein, and 3.6 grams of fat.
  • Chicken Tenderloin (Raw, Skinless): Some nutritional sources suggest around 89 calories, 22.3 grams of protein, and 1.34 grams of fat. However, some discrepancies exist and may be due to variations in processing or measurement of raw vs. cooked weight.

Looking at these figures, it appears that chicken tenderloins are, in fact, lower in calories than chicken breasts on a per-serving basis. This is primarily due to their smaller size and slightly different muscle composition. However, the difference is not as significant as some marketing might suggest and can be easily negated by cooking methods.

Cooking Methods and Their Caloric Impact

How you prepare your chicken has a major impact on its final calorie and fat content. This is where the initial caloric advantage of the tenderloin can be lost.

  • Frying: Cooking chicken in oil, especially deep-frying, adds a significant amount of calories and fat. Chicken tenders, often breaded and fried, can end up being far more caloric than a simply grilled chicken breast.
  • Grilling and Baking: These low-fat cooking methods are excellent for both cuts. Because of its size, a chicken breast will take longer to cook, but it will retain its lean profile. Tenderloins cook faster, making them convenient for quick meals.
  • Sauces and Marinades: While a flavorful marinade can enhance either cut, some store-bought sauces and marinades are high in sugar and sodium, adding hidden calories and making the final meal less healthy. Tenderloins, due to their smaller size, can absorb more of the marinade relative to their volume.

A Comparative Look at Key Nutrients

Beyond calories, both cuts of chicken offer a variety of essential nutrients. The differences, while small, can be relevant for those with specific dietary needs.

Attribute Chicken Tenderloin (per 100g, approx.) Chicken Breast (per 100g, approx.)
Calories ~89 kcal ~165 kcal
Protein ~22.3g ~31g
Fat ~1.34g ~3.6g
Sodium Relatively higher Relatively lower
Magnesium Minimal amount Higher
Potassium Minimal amount Higher
Cost Typically more expensive per pound Typically less expensive per pound

Which Cut is Right for You?

Choosing between tenderloins and breasts depends on your priorities:

  • For maximum protein: Chicken breast offers a slightly higher protein content per 100g, making it a powerful muscle-building tool.
  • For weight management: The raw calorie difference is minimal, but the larger size and slower cooking time of chicken breast may help with satiety. However, for a quick, low-calorie meal, a plainly cooked tenderloin is an excellent choice.
  • For convenience: Tenderloins cook faster due to their smaller size, ideal for a fast stir-fry or pan-searing.
  • For budget: Chicken breast is often more cost-effective per pound, especially when bought in larger packs.

Nutritional Information Consistency

It is important to acknowledge that nutritional information, especially concerning chicken tenderloins, can sometimes be inconsistent online. Differences can arise from whether the data refers to raw or cooked measurements, brand variations, or processing methods. The most reliable information comes from government food databases like the USDA's or reputable health sites that cite their sources. For personalized dietary advice, it is always best to consult a registered dietitian or healthcare professional. For more general guidelines on healthy poultry consumption, a good resource is the National Chicken Council.

Conclusion

Ultimately, when asking, "are tenderloins less calories than breasts?", the answer is yes, on a gram-for-gram basis, tenderloins do have a slightly lower calorie count. However, the difference is marginal and easily influenced by how the chicken is prepared. For most health-conscious individuals, the best choice depends less on this small caloric discrepancy and more on cooking method, cost, and meal prep convenience. Both cuts are excellent sources of lean protein and can fit into a healthy diet when prepared simply with minimal added fats or sodium.

Key Takeaways

  • Tenderloins have slightly fewer calories: Per 100 grams, boneless, skinless chicken tenderloins are marginally lower in calories than chicken breasts due to being smaller and leaner.
  • Cooking method is crucial: Preparation has a greater impact on final calorie count than the initial cut. Frying tenderloins will add more calories and fat than grilling or baking a chicken breast.
  • Breasts offer more protein density: Chicken breast provides a higher protein content per 100 grams, which is beneficial for muscle building and satiety.
  • Tenderloins are more expensive: Despite their smaller size, tenderloins are often more expensive per pound than chicken breasts due to having fewer per chicken.
  • Both are excellent lean options: For a healthy, high-protein diet, both chicken breast and tenderloins are great choices, provided they are cooked with minimal fat and high-sodium additions.
  • Consider nutritional information carefully: Be mindful of inconsistencies in online data regarding raw vs. cooked weights and processing variations.

FAQs

Question: Which is better for weight loss, chicken breast or tenderloin? Answer: Both are excellent for weight loss due to being high in protein and low in fat. The best choice depends on your cooking method, as frying can negate the benefits of either cut. Both promote satiety, which is helpful for weight management.

Question: Is there a significant flavor difference between chicken breast and tenderloin? Answer: The flavor is very similar, though some describe tenderloins as slightly more pronounced due to their higher natural fat and sodium content. Tenderloins also cook faster, which can impact the final texture.

Question: Why are tenderloins more expensive than breasts? Answer: Tenderloins are a smaller, more delicate part of the chicken, and there are only two per bird. This lower yield makes them a pricier, premium cut.

Question: Can I substitute chicken tenderloins for chicken breasts in recipes? Answer: Yes, you can often substitute them, especially in recipes that call for smaller, quicker-cooking pieces, like stir-fries or curries. However, note that breasts are thicker and will require a longer cooking time.

Question: Does adding the skin make a difference in calories? Answer: Yes, adding the skin significantly increases the calorie and fat content for both cuts. A skinless cut is always the leaner option.

Question: Are chicken tenders and tenderloins the same thing? Answer: A chicken tenderloin is the natural strip of muscle, while chicken tenders (often found breaded and fried) are a prepared product that may be made from tenderloins or cut from the breast. The preparation method is the key difference.

Question: Is the nutritional value the same for raw and cooked chicken? Answer: No, cooking can change nutritional values, mainly through the loss of water weight and the addition of cooking fats or oils. Nutritional labels typically specify if they are for raw or cooked portions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Both are excellent for weight loss due to being high in protein and low in fat. The best choice depends on your cooking method, as frying can negate the benefits of either cut. Both promote satiety, which is helpful for weight management.

The flavor is very similar, though some describe tenderloins as slightly more pronounced due to their higher natural fat and sodium content. Tenderloins also cook faster, which can impact the final texture.

Tenderloins are a smaller, more delicate part of the chicken, and there are only two per bird. This lower yield makes them a pricier, premium cut.

Yes, you can often substitute them, especially in recipes that call for smaller, quicker-cooking pieces, like stir-fries or curries. However, note that breasts are thicker and will require a longer cooking time.

Yes, adding the skin significantly increases the calorie and fat content for both cuts. A skinless cut is always the leaner option.

A chicken tenderloin is the natural strip of muscle, while chicken tenders (often found breaded and fried) are a prepared product that may be made from tenderloins or cut from the breast. The preparation method is the key difference.

No, cooking can change nutritional values, mainly through the loss of water weight and the addition of cooking fats or oils. Nutritional labels typically specify if they are for raw or cooked portions.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.