Skip to content

Are there nanoparticles in Coca-Cola products? The science explained

4 min read

According to a 2018 study, fluorescent nanoparticles were detected in both Coca-Cola and Pepsi products, sparking curiosity and concern among consumers. This raises the important question: are there nanoparticles in Coca-Cola products, and what do these findings mean for consumer safety?

Quick Summary

A 2018 study found fluorescent carbon-based nanoparticles in Coca-Cola and Pepsi. The particles, likely formed incidentally during manufacturing, were shown to cross the blood-brain barrier in mice. Regulatory agencies approach nanoparticles on a case-by-case basis, and ongoing research is evaluating long-term health effects.

Key Points

  • Discovery: A 2018 study detected fluorescent, carbon-based nanoparticles in both Coca-Cola and Pepsi products, measuring around 5 nanometers.

  • Source: These particles are believed to be incidental byproducts formed during the manufacturing and processing of ingredients, not intentionally added engineered materials.

  • Bio-effects: Animal studies revealed that these particles can be absorbed by cells and can cross the blood-brain barrier, accumulating in major organs.

  • Toxicity: Acute toxicity tests on mice showed no significant harm at the tested dosages, but long-term health effects in humans are still unknown.

  • Regulation: The FDA uses a case-by-case, science-based approach to regulate nanomaterials in food, while the EU requires labeling for intentionally added engineered nanomaterials and has banned some, like titanium dioxide.

  • Other Nanomaterials: Ingredients like titanium dioxide (E171) and silicon dioxide (E551), known to contain nano-sized particles, are sometimes used in other sodas but are being phased out by major brands, especially in Europe.

In This Article

Nanoparticles and the Food Industry

Nanotechnology, the manipulation of matter on an atomic and molecular scale, has numerous applications in the food industry. These can be intentional, such as using nano-encapsulation to improve nutrient absorption or mask flavors, or they can occur incidentally during processing. The presence of nanoparticles in beverages, including the topic of nanoparticles in Coca-Cola products, has become a subject of both scientific research and public speculation.

The 2018 Study on Fluorescent Carbon Dots

A landmark study published in the journal Nanotoxicology in 2018 was the first to report the presence of fluorescent nanoparticles in Coca-Cola and Pepsi. These tiny particles, identified as carbon dots (CDs) around 5 nanometers in size, fluoresced under ultraviolet light, indicating their presence. The research team isolated and characterized these particles to evaluate their properties and potential biological effects through in vitro (cell-based) and in vivo (animal-based) studies.

The study found that these fluorescent particles were absorbed by living cells and could accumulate in the cytoplasm and cell membranes. Additionally, in mouse studies, the nanoparticles were found to accumulate in major organs, including the liver and brain, suggesting they can cross the blood-brain barrier. It is crucial to note, however, that the study found no obvious acute toxicity or apparent organ damage in the mice at the tested dosages. The researchers highlighted that much is still unknown about the long-term human health impacts of these foodborne nanoparticles.

Engineered vs. Incidental Nanoparticles

The discovery of nanoparticles in Coca-Cola does not necessarily mean they were deliberately added. Nanoparticles can form as a byproduct of chemical reactions during manufacturing or processing. The 2018 study's findings are distinct from other, often sensationalized, claims of intentionally added 'nanobots' or other engineered materials. A key distinction must be made between intentionally engineered nanomaterials and those formed incidentally.

Major beverage manufacturers have not disclosed using intentionally engineered nanoparticles in their core products. The ingredients list for standard Coca-Cola, for instance, includes carbonated water, high fructose corn syrup, caramel color, phosphoric acid, natural flavors, and caffeine, none of which are intentionally manufactured nanomaterials. The nanoparticles found by researchers are most likely a result of the complex chemical processes involved in creating the beverage's ingredients, like the caramel color or flavorings, where large molecules can break down into nano-sized components.

A Look at Other Nanomaterials in Food

While carbon dots are believed to be incidentally formed, other types of nanomaterials are sometimes intentionally used in the food industry. Key examples include:

  • Titanium Dioxide (E171): Historically used as a whitener in some foods and drinks, including cloudy citrus sodas. The EU banned its use as a food additive in 2022 due to potential health concerns, prompting many major companies to remove it from their recipes in Europe. The FDA in the US still permits its use.
  • Silicon Dioxide (E551): Acts as an anti-caking agent in powdered drink mixes and some other food items, and often contains nano-sized particles.
  • Silver (E174): Approved for limited food uses in some regions, though research suggests potential for adverse health effects related to intestinal migration.

Regulatory Landscape and Safety Research

Regulatory bodies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) have been developing guidelines for nanomaterials in food. The FDA does not treat nanotechnology as inherently safe or harmful but evaluates products on a case-by-case, science-based approach. Industry is responsible for ensuring its products meet all legal safety requirements, and the FDA encourages consultation for products involving nanomaterials. In the EU, regulations require labeling of intentionally added engineered nanomaterials, though incidental particles are not subject to the same requirement. The evolving regulatory landscape highlights the need for ongoing research into the long-term health effects of ingesting nanoparticles.

Nanoparticles in Coca-Cola vs. Engineered Additives

Feature Incidental Nanoparticles (e.g., carbon dots in Coke) Engineered Nanomaterials (e.g., TiO2, SiO2)
Intentionality Occur unintentionally as byproducts of manufacturing processes. Deliberately produced to have specific functions in food.
Composition Carbon-based fluorescent dots detected via advanced methods. Wide range, including titanium dioxide, silicon dioxide, and silver.
Purpose None; their presence is a consequence of production. Used for specific functions like whitening, anti-caking, or enhanced bioavailability.
Regulatory Status (EU) Not explicitly regulated or labeled as 'nano' if not intentionally added. Intentionally added engineered nanomaterials must be labeled 'nano' (E171 was banned).
Regulatory Status (US) Falls under existing regulations; FDA evaluates on a case-by-case basis. Must meet safety standards; some, like E171, are still permitted under limits.

Conclusion

While a 2018 study confirmed the presence of fluorescent carbon-based nanoparticles in Coca-Cola, these appear to be incidental byproducts of the manufacturing process rather than intentionally added engineered materials. The health implications of consuming such foodborne nanoparticles over the long term are not yet fully understood and remain a topic of ongoing scientific research. Regulatory bodies are taking cautious, science-based approaches to managing and assessing nanomaterials in the food supply. For consumers, staying informed about ingredient lists and the latest research is the most prudent approach. For instance, in regions with stricter regulations like the EU, certain potentially nano-containing additives have been removed from formulations. Ultimately, the tiny, incidental particles in Coca-Cola are a fascinating and evolving aspect of modern food science.

For more detailed information on nanotechnology in food, consult the review paper available from the National Institutes of Health.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, there is no evidence that Coca-Cola intentionally adds engineered nanoparticles to its beverages. The nanoparticles found in a 2018 study are believed to be incidental byproducts formed during the manufacturing process, not deliberate additives.

A 2018 study identified fluorescent carbon-based nanoparticles, known as carbon dots, in Coca-Cola and Pepsi. These particles, found through advanced detection methods, are very small, measuring around 5 nanometers.

The health effects of the incidental nanoparticles in Coca-Cola are not yet fully understood. While an acute animal study showed no significant toxicity at tested dosages, long-term human health impacts have not been sufficiently studied.

Incidental nanoparticles form unintentionally as a byproduct of food processing, such as during heating or chemical reactions. Engineered nanoparticles are deliberately produced and added to food for a specific purpose, such as improving color or shelf life.

The FDA regulates nanomaterials in food and food packaging on a case-by-case basis, rather than making a blanket judgment. They require rigorous safety assessments for intentionally added nanomaterials and encourage consultation with manufacturers.

Yes, the 2018 study found that the carbon dot nanoparticles in Coca-Cola were able to cross the blood-brain barrier and accumulate in the brains of mice.

To potentially avoid nanoparticles, consumers can look for sodas with simple ingredient lists, as more complex formulations may have a higher chance of incidental particle formation. It is also beneficial to check ingredient lists for known additives like titanium dioxide (E171) or silicon dioxide (E551), particularly in citrus-flavored or opaque drinks.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.