Skip to content

Can a Human Survive Eating Once a Day? The Dangers and Limited Benefits of OMAD

3 min read

While some studies have shown that restricting calorie intake to a small window can aid weight loss, it's important to understand the full context. Asking, "Can a human survive eating once a day?" requires a serious look at the potential metabolic and nutritional dangers of this extreme intermittent fasting practice, known as OMAD.

Quick Summary

The one meal a day (OMAD) diet involves a 23-hour fast, but health experts warn against its potential long-term risks, including nutritional inadequacy, increased cholesterol, and metabolic disruptions.

Key Points

  • High risk of nutritional deficiencies: Consuming all daily nutrients in one sitting is extremely difficult, leading to a high likelihood of deficiencies.

  • Not recommended for most people: Most healthcare professionals advise against the OMAD diet due to its extreme nature and associated risks.

  • Potential for muscle mass loss: Severe calorie restriction on OMAD can cause the body to burn lean muscle for energy, slowing metabolism.

  • May disrupt metabolic health: Some studies suggest OMAD can increase cholesterol, blood pressure, and cause glucose instability.

  • High dropout rate: Due to intense hunger, irritability, and other side effects, OMAD is difficult to sustain long-term.

  • Alternative methods are safer: Less restrictive intermittent fasting methods, like 16:8, offer many similar benefits with fewer risks.

  • Consult a professional first: Never start an extreme diet like OMAD without first speaking with a doctor or registered dietitian.

In This Article

Understanding the One Meal a Day (OMAD) Diet

One Meal a Day, or OMAD, is a form of intermittent fasting where a person consumes their entire daily caloric intake within a single, condensed eating window, usually lasting about an hour. This leaves a 23-hour period of fasting, during which only non-caloric beverages like water, black coffee, and plain tea are permitted. The appeal lies in its simplicity and the potential for rapid weight loss through significant calorie reduction. However, this extreme approach forces the body into a prolonged fasted state, with consequences that are not fully understood, particularly for long-term health.

The Body's Reaction to Extreme Fasting

When following the OMAD diet, the body undergoes a metabolic shift. During the extended fast, the body depletes its stored glucose and begins to burn fat for energy through a process called ketosis. This prolonged fasted state also triggers cellular repair mechanisms, known as autophagy. Yet, unlike less restrictive fasting methods, the extreme nature of OMAD means these adaptations happen under greater duress, potentially causing significant metabolic instability and stress.

Potential Benefits (and Why They're Questionable)

Proponents often cite benefits associated with fasting in general, not necessarily OMAD specifically. While some short-term studies have shown effects like weight loss and some metabolic improvements, these are often observed in controlled, small-scale studies and are not always superior to more sustainable methods.

  • Weight Loss: Consuming fewer calories will result in weight loss. However, this calorie reduction can be achieved with less drastic and more sustainable methods, and OMAD may lead to lean muscle mass loss.
  • Autophagy: The extended fasting period may promote cellular cleanup. However, less extreme intermittent fasting methods also trigger this process without the same level of risk.
  • Improved Insulin Sensitivity: Prolonged periods of low insulin could improve sensitivity. But some studies suggest OMAD specifically can impair glucose tolerance and increase fasting blood sugar.

The Proven Dangers and Downsides of the OMAD Diet

  • Serious Nutritional Deficiencies: It is nearly impossible to meet all daily macro- and micronutrient requirements in one meal, leading to malnutrition over time. This can result in fatigue, weakness, and long-term health issues.
  • Significant Muscle Mass Loss: Extreme calorie restriction often results in the body breaking down muscle tissue for energy, particularly if protein intake is insufficient during the single meal. This can slow metabolism and increase frailty, especially in older adults.
  • Adverse Metabolic Effects: Some studies show that OMAD can lead to increased total and LDL ("bad") cholesterol, as well as higher blood pressure. It can also increase the appetite-stimulating hormone ghrelin, leading to increased hunger.
  • Increased Mortality Risk: A 2023 study found that skipping meals and having a shorter eating window was associated with an increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality.
  • Negative Side Effects: Many people experience severe hunger, dizziness, low energy, irritability, constipation, and difficulty concentrating while adapting to OMAD.
  • Risk of Disordered Eating: The restrictive nature of the OMAD diet can promote unhealthy eating behaviors and increase the risk of binge eating and other disordered patterns.

Comparison of OMAD and Safer Alternatives

Feature OMAD (One Meal a Day) 16:8 Intermittent Fasting Balanced, Calorie-Controlled Diet
Fasting Window 23 hours 16 hours N/A (no fasting)
Eating Window 1 hour 8 hours All day, controlled portions
Risk of Deficiencies High Lower Low, with proper planning
Sustainability Very low for most Moderate to High High
Long-Term Evidence Limited research, many risks Growing evidence, generally safer Extensive, well-established
Suitability for Athletes Generally unsuitable Possible, with careful planning Suitable and recommended

Expert Recommendations and Conclusion

Most health professionals advise against the OMAD diet as a long-term strategy for overall health. The risks, which include nutritional deficiencies, loss of muscle mass, metabolic disruption, and increased cholesterol, often outweigh the potential weight loss benefits, which can be achieved more safely through less extreme methods. Sustainable weight management and improved health are best achieved through a balanced, nutrient-dense diet combined with regular physical activity.

For most people, the trade-offs involved in attempting to survive on one meal a day are simply not worth it. If you are considering any form of intermittent fasting, it is crucial to consult with a doctor or registered dietitian to ensure it is safe and appropriate for your individual health needs.

For additional information on the risks and benefits of the OMAD diet, consult Healthline.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, most health professionals do not consider eating once a day for a long period to be safe. It significantly increases the risk of nutritional deficiencies, muscle loss, and can lead to adverse metabolic effects.

Some studies have found that individuals on the OMAD diet experienced an increase in total and LDL ('bad') cholesterol levels compared to those with more frequent meals.

No, OMAD is particularly risky for people with diabetes. The extended fasting can cause dangerous fluctuations in blood sugar levels and impaired glucose regulation.

The fatigue and irritability are often caused by low blood sugar levels during the prolonged fast and a lack of consistent energy supply for the brain. Your body is also under stress from the extreme calorie restriction.

Yes, prolonged and severe calorie restriction, like that on OMAD, can cause your metabolism to slow down as your body tries to conserve energy, making weight loss more difficult over time.

For most people, safer and more sustainable options include less restrictive forms of intermittent fasting, such as the 16:8 method, or simply adopting a balanced, calorie-controlled diet with regular physical activity.

Yes, the intense hunger and mental strain from fasting for 23 hours can trigger overeating or binge-eating episodes during the single meal, potentially undermining weight loss efforts and creating an unhealthy relationship with food.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.