Skip to content

Do licking envelopes have calories? Uncovering the Truth

4 min read

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the adhesive on a U.S. envelope contains around 1.7 calories per gram, which equates to about one-tenth of a calorie per lick. This fact confirms that yes, licking envelopes have calories, but the amount is so minuscule it has no impact on your diet.

Quick Summary

The minuscule caloric content of envelope adhesive is derived from starches and natural gums used in its manufacturing. The amount consumed from a single lick is functionally zero and holds no nutritional value. While non-toxic, licking multiple envelopes offers no dietary benefit and alternatives are available for those with concerns.

Key Points

  • Insignificant Calories: Licking an envelope provides less than 0.1 calories, a negligible amount that won't impact your diet.

  • Food-Safe Ingredients: Envelope adhesive is typically made from non-toxic, food-grade materials like cornstarch, potato starch, or gum arabic.

  • Myth vs. Reality: The idea of significant calories from licking envelopes is an urban myth, as the actual caloric intake is minimal.

  • Risk-Free: For most people, licking a new, clean envelope is safe; risks of illness or harm are extremely low due to FDA oversight.

  • Alternatives Exist: If you prefer not to lick, using a moist sponge or opting for self-adhesive envelopes are practical alternatives.

  • Caloric Content Varies: Adhesives can have different caloric densities, but the quantity used on a single envelope is always very small.

  • Modern Adhesives: Many modern stamps and envelopes are self-adhesive and don't require licking at all.

In This Article

Understanding the Composition of Envelope Adhesive

To grasp why licking an envelope involves consuming a trace amount of calories, one must first understand what the glue is made of. The adhesive, often referred to as 'envelope gum,' is not the same as household glue. Traditionally, and still commonly today, it's made from food-safe ingredients.

The primary components of water-activated envelope glue are natural starches and gums. Historically, gum arabic—a natural substance from the hardened sap of acacia trees—was a standard ingredient. This ingredient is also used as a stabilizer in food products like marshmallows and gumdrops. In modern manufacturing, especially in the United States, cornstarch or potato starch is also widely used, often in combination with synthetic resins. The Envelope Manufacturers Association (EMA) has stated that adhesive made from cornstarch is gluten-free.

The Negligible Caloric Count

The caloric value of envelope adhesive comes from these carbohydrate-based ingredients. For instance, gum arabic has approximately 1.7 calories per gram. However, the actual amount of glue on a single envelope flap is extremely small. The trace amount transferred to your tongue during a single lick contains less than 0.1 calories, a quantity so insignificant it's not even worth considering in any dietary context. The energy required to raise your tongue to the envelope is likely greater than the calories you would consume.

Comparison of Envelope Sealing Methods and Caloric Content

Feature Water-Activated (Gummed) Self-Adhesive (Peel & Seal)
Adhesive Base Gum Arabic, dextrin, cornstarch, potato starch Latex or synthetic resin
Caloric Content Yes, but negligible (less than 0.1 calories per lick) None (no consumption involved)
Application Requires moistening with tongue or a damp sponge Simply peel off a strip and press to seal
Health Safety Non-toxic, overseen by the FDA Non-toxic, no risk of ingestion
Taste Can be unpleasant or have a chemical taste No taste
Common Use Traditional envelopes, machine-insertable envelopes Modern office and mail-order envelopes

Are there any risks to licking envelopes?

For the most part, licking a new, clean envelope is safe. The ingredients are non-toxic and regulated by bodies like the FDA for consumer contact. The risk of getting sick from a clean envelope is minimal. However, there are a few reasons why people might choose to use an alternative to licking:

  • Unpleasant Taste: Some people find the taste of the adhesive unappealing.
  • Germs and Contaminants: While a low risk, envelopes can carry germs from manufacturing, shipping, or handling.
  • Paper Cuts: An occasional tongue paper cut is an unpleasant, if minor, risk.
  • Allergies: In very rare cases, an individual might have a minor sensitivity or allergic reaction to one of the ingredients, though this is not common.

As an alternative, a moist sponge or an envelope moistening tool can be used to activate the adhesive without using your tongue. This is especially useful when sealing a large volume of mail, such as wedding invitations, where the cumulative effect of the taste might become an issue.

The Verdict on Envelope Calories

The idea that licking an envelope could add a significant number of calories to your diet is a popular myth that holds no weight. While it technically does have a caloric value, it is so infinitesimally small that it is utterly irrelevant to any dietary or weight management plan. The caloric content is derived from simple, food-safe ingredients like cornstarch or gum arabic, which are present in tiny quantities. For all practical purposes, the calories from licking an envelope can be considered zero. This curiosity is more a testament to the fact that almost everything we consume, no matter how small, contains some form of energy, but not all of it is meaningful. If you are ever concerned about licking envelopes, the simplest solution is to use one of the many alternatives available, such as a moist sponge or peel-and-seal envelopes. Ultimately, you can put this particular nutritional concern out of your mind for good. For more information on the safety of envelope adhesives, you can consult official sources like the Envelope Manufacturers Association.

What is the history behind envelope glue?

Lickable glue on envelopes and stamps has been around for over 150 years. The use of potato starch-based glue was patented for envelopes in the 1840s. The formulation evolved over time, with gum arabic becoming a common ingredient. While the technology has progressed to include peel-and-seal options, the water-activated adhesive remains a fixture, relying on these time-tested, food-safe ingredients.

Conclusion

In summary, the notion of envelope calories is an interesting but practically insignificant detail. The trace amounts of calories from the food-safe starches or gums used in the adhesive are not enough to affect your diet in any measurable way. The occasional lick is safe for the average person, although alternatives are available for those with concerns about taste, hygiene, or sensitivities. This popular topic serves as a fun conversation starter rather than a serious dietary consideration.

Frequently Asked Questions

One lick of a standard U.S. envelope contains approximately one-tenth of a calorie (0.1 calories). The exact amount is so small it is nutritionally insignificant.

No, the adhesive used on modern envelopes is non-toxic and is overseen by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. It is made from food-grade ingredients like cornstarch and gum arabic.

Gummed envelopes have a water-activated strip that requires moisture to seal, while self-adhesive envelopes have a peel-and-stick strip that is instantly sealed by pressure.

No, it is not possible to gain weight from licking envelopes. The calories are so minimal that they have no impact on your daily caloric intake or body weight.

While the glue itself is safe, envelopes can carry germs from handling. The risk of getting sick is very low, but using a moist sponge is a safer alternative if you are concerned.

The adhesive is commonly made from dextrin or gum arabic, which are natural, non-toxic substances. Some modern adhesives also use corn or potato starch.

Some historical reports have suggested different caloric content for foreign stamps. For example, British stamps were once reported to have around 5.9 calories, but they are now self-adhesive, and the caloric amount is irrelevant.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.