Skip to content

Do Stabilisers Make Food Ultra Processed? An In-depth Look

4 min read

According to the most widely used NOVA food classification system, ultra-processed foods are defined by containing ingredients not typically used in home cooking, which often includes stabilisers. However, this simple fact raises a critical question for many consumers: do stabilisers alone make a product ultra-processed, or is it a more complex issue involving the entire formulation and manufacturing process?

Quick Summary

This article explores the relationship between food stabilisers and ultra-processed foods, differentiating between processed and ultra-processed items based on the NOVA classification system. It examines the function of stabilisers, their common sources, and how to interpret food labels. The discussion clarifies that while stabilisers are a marker of ultra-processing, their presence alone does not define a food's health impact, which is more dependent on the overall nutritional profile.

Key Points

  • NOVA Classification: The most common system for categorizing processed foods, which places items with industrially-formulated ingredients like stabilisers into the 'ultra-processed' group.

  • Stabilisers are Additives: Stabilisers are substances added to food to maintain texture and consistency. They are often derived from natural sources but are still classified as additives.

  • Processing is Not Just Stabilisers: A food is deemed 'ultra-processed' due to the combination of extensive industrial processing, multiple extracted ingredients, and the addition of substances not used in home cooking—not just the presence of a single stabiliser.

  • Context is Key: A product's health impact depends on its overall nutritional profile, not just whether it contains a stabiliser. Some products with stabilisers can be more nutritious than other ultra-processed alternatives.

  • Read the Label: The best way to identify ultra-processed food is to look for a long list of unfamiliar ingredients and additives, along with high levels of fat, sugar, and salt.

  • Focus on Whole Foods: For optimal health, focus on consuming a diet rich in whole and minimally processed foods, rather than becoming overly concerned with the presence of every single food additive.

  • Food Classification Debate: There is no universal consensus on the definition of 'ultra-processed food,' and expert opinions vary on how to weigh the impact of processing methods versus nutritional content.

In This Article

Understanding the NOVA Classification System

The NOVA system, developed by Brazilian researchers, categorizes foods based on the extent and purpose of their processing, rather than their nutrient content. This classification is crucial for understanding why a food is labeled 'ultra-processed.'

The Four NOVA Groups

  • Group 1: Unprocessed or minimally processed foods. These are natural foods with minimal alterations, such as fresh fruits, vegetables, meat, and eggs. The processing methods used (e.g., freezing, pasteurization, drying) are designed to preserve the food's natural state without adding extra ingredients.
  • Group 2: Processed culinary ingredients. These are substances derived from Group 1 foods through processes like pressing, refining, or milling. Examples include sugar, vegetable oils, and salt, which are not meant to be eaten on their own but are used to season and cook other foods.
  • Group 3: Processed foods. Created by combining Group 1 and Group 2 items, these are simple products like canned vegetables with salt or bread made with flour, water, and yeast. The purpose of processing is generally to increase the durability of Group 1 foods.
  • Group 4: Ultra-processed foods (UPFs). This category includes industrially produced foods made with ingredients and additives not typically found in a home kitchen. The processing methods often involve the fractioning of whole foods into substances like fats, starches, and protein isolates, which are then reassembled with flavourings, colours, and stabilisers. The primary purpose is to create products that are cheap, highly palatable, and have a long shelf life, often leading to poor nutritional quality.

The Role of Stabilisers in Food Production

Stabilisers are a type of food additive used to maintain a product's physical properties, such as texture, consistency, and stability over time. They prevent ingredients from separating, inhibit the formation of ice crystals in frozen desserts, and give a product its desired mouthfeel. Many stabilisers are derived from natural sources, such as plants, seaweed, or seeds.

Commonly used stabilisers include:

  • Xanthan Gum: A polysaccharide produced by fermentation, often used in salad dressings and gluten-free products.
  • Pectin: A naturally occurring polysaccharide found in fruits, commonly used to set jams and jellies.
  • Carrageenan: Extracted from red seaweed, this is frequently used in dairy products like yogurt and ice cream to prevent whey separation.
  • Guar Gum: Derived from guar beans, it is used for its thickening and stabilising properties in various dairy products and sauces.

Are Stabilisers Alone Enough to Classify a Food as Ultra-Processed?

This is a common point of confusion. The presence of a stabiliser, while often associated with ultra-processed foods, is not the sole determining factor. For instance, a gourmet ice cream made with simple, high-quality ingredients might contain a plant-derived stabiliser like guar gum to achieve a perfect texture. By the strict NOVA definition, it would be considered ultra-processed because of the additive, but its overall nutritional profile could be much better than a low-cost, mass-produced alternative laden with sugar and unhealthy fats.

The key distinction lies in the context and extent of the processing. Ultra-processed foods are defined by a constellation of factors, including extensive industrial techniques, a long list of extracted and modified ingredients, and a poor nutritional balance. A single, naturally derived stabiliser in an otherwise healthy, minimally processed product does not automatically put it in the same category as a highly formulated, sugar-laden breakfast cereal.

Navigating the Food Aisle: How to Tell the Difference

To make informed choices, consumers should look beyond a single ingredient. The NOVA system and other classification methods help provide a framework for a more holistic evaluation.

Comparison Table: Processed vs. Ultra-Processed

Feature Processed Food (NOVA Group 3) Ultra-Processed Food (NOVA Group 4)
Core Ingredients Primarily whole or minimally processed foods. Industrial ingredients and extracts (e.g., starches, protein isolates).
Number of Ingredients Generally fewer than five. Typically five or more ingredients.
Additives May contain basic additives like salt or sugar. Often includes specific stabilisers, emulsifiers, artificial colours, and flavours.
Industrial Processing Uses relatively simple cooking or preservation methods (e.g., canning, fermentation). Involves extensive industrial techniques (e.g., moulding, extrusion).
Nutritional Profile Varies, but often retains significant nutritional value. Frequently high in unhealthy fats, sugar, and salt, with little nutritional value.
Example Canned chickpeas, bread from a local bakery. Flavoured yogurt with sweeteners, mass-produced bread with stabilisers.

Conclusion: Beyond a Single Ingredient

While stabilisers are a characteristic of ultra-processed foods under the NOVA classification, they are not the sole factor determining a product's place in this category. The true definition rests on the nature and extent of the processing, the industrial origin of the ingredients, and the resulting nutritional composition. Instead of fixating on a single additive, consumers are better served by reading labels for the full list of ingredients and assessing the overall nutritional value. Prioritising whole, minimally processed foods remains the best approach for a healthy diet. In an increasingly complex food landscape, a critical understanding of these distinctions empowers individuals to make better dietary choices without unnecessary alarm over every additive. For more information on food classification and healthy eating, consult the NHS Eatwell Guide.

Frequently Asked Questions

According to the NOVA system, an ultra-processed food is a formulation of ingredients created by a series of industrial techniques, containing substances and additives not typically used in home cooking, such as stabilisers, emulsifiers, and artificial flavours.

No, not all food additives are bad. Many, including naturally derived stabilisers like pectin and guar gum, are considered safe within acceptable daily intake limits and approved by regulatory bodies like the FDA and EFSA. Some additives, however, can cause digestive issues or allergies in sensitive individuals.

Stabilisers, like other additives, must be listed on the food label. Look for ingredients such as carrageenan, guar gum, xanthan gum, or pectin, sometimes identified by their E-number code (e.g., E412 for guar gum).

Some stabilisers can offer health benefits. For instance, certain hydrocolloids act as prebiotics that promote beneficial gut bacteria and improve digestive health. Others, like pectin and guar gum, can increase satiety, aid in weight management, and may help lower cholesterol.

The primary function of a stabiliser is to maintain the texture, consistency, and overall physical properties of a food product, preventing ingredients from separating over time. They are crucial for products like creamy ice cream or uniform salad dressings.

Yes, a food with stabilisers can still be part of a healthy diet, depending on its overall nutritional profile. For example, some low-fat yogurts or wholegrain breads containing stabilisers might offer valuable nutrients. The focus should be on the total diet composition, not just one type of ingredient.

Traditional nutritional scoring systems focus on a food's nutrient content (e.g., fat, sugar, salt), whereas the NOVA classification groups foods based on the degree of industrial processing they undergo. A diet high in ultra-processed foods has been linked to poor health outcomes, though it is still debated whether this is due to the processing itself or the poor nutritional content often found in these products.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.