Skip to content

Does kale have more calories than spinach? An in-depth nutritional comparison

3 min read

According to the USDA, a 100g serving of raw kale contains 43 calories, while the same amount of raw spinach has 23 calories. The question of whether does kale have more calories than spinach has a clear answer, but understanding the full nutritional picture is far more complex.

Quick Summary

Raw kale contains more calories and carbohydrates than raw spinach, but both are exceptionally low-calorie, nutrient-dense foods. The best choice depends on specific nutritional goals, such as iron, folate, or vitamin C intake.

Key Points

  • Calorie Count: Raw kale has more calories per 100g than raw spinach, though both are very low-calorie.

  • Nutrient Differences: Kale is richer in vitamin C and calcium, while spinach boasts higher levels of folate, iron, and magnesium.

  • Preparation Matters: Cooking can reduce oxalates in spinach, increasing mineral absorption, while raw kale offers more vitamin C.

  • Dietary Considerations: Spinach has high oxalates (potentially affecting those with kidney stones), and kale contains goitrogens (a concern only with high intake and thyroid issues).

  • Best for Overall Health: Incorporating both kale and spinach into your diet ensures a wider range of vitamins and minerals.

  • Weight Management: As both are low-calorie and high in fiber, they are excellent for weight loss and satiety.

  • Cooking Versatility: Spinach is better for quick cooking due to its tender leaves, while kale's hardier texture withstands longer cooking times.

In This Article

Kale vs. Spinach: The Calorie and Nutrient Breakdown

When comparing the calorie content of kale and spinach, the numbers vary depending on whether the vegetables are raw or cooked and the serving size used for comparison. For example, a standard 100-gram serving of raw kale contains 43 calories, while 100 grams of raw spinach contains just 23 calories. When measured by volume, such as a cup, the numbers can be closer due to how tightly packed the leaves are. Regardless of the measurement, both greens are incredibly low in calories relative to their nutrient density, making them excellent choices for any health-conscious diet.

Raw Nutritional Comparison (per 100 grams)

To provide a clear picture of their nutritional differences beyond just calories, here is a detailed look at 100g of raw kale versus 100g of raw spinach, based on data from various sources.

Nutrient Raw Kale (100g) Raw Spinach (100g)
Calories 43 kcal 23 kcal
Carbohydrates 4.42 g 3.63 g
Fiber 4.1 g 2.2 g
Protein 2.92 g 2.86 g
Vitamin K 390 mcg (325% DV) 483 mcg (403% DV)
Vitamin C 93.4 mg (104% DV) 28.1 mg (31% DV)
Vitamin A 241 mcg (27% DV) 469 mcg (52% DV)
Folate (B9) 62 mcg (16% DV) 194 mcg (49% DV)
Calcium 254 mg (20% DV) 99 mg (8% DV)
Iron 1.6 mg (9% DV) 2.71 mg (15% DV)
Magnesium 33 mg (8% DV) 79 mg (19% DV)

Digging Deeper into Health Benefits and Nutrient Profiles

Beyond the basic calorie count, the choice between kale and spinach is influenced by their unique vitamin and mineral concentrations. Kale, a cruciferous vegetable, is known for its high content of vitamins C and K, as well as calcium. Spinach, on the other hand, is a champion for folate and a great source of iron and magnesium. Both greens are packed with antioxidants that combat cellular damage and inflammation.

The Impact of Preparation on Nutrients

Cooking methods significantly influence the nutritional value of both vegetables. For instance, lightly cooking spinach can actually make certain nutrients, like iron and calcium, more bioavailable by reducing its high oxalate content. Conversely, cooking can reduce the heat-sensitive vitamin C in kale. For raw preparations, like salads, massaging kale leaves can tenderize them and improve palatability. For soups or sautéed dishes, spinach wilts faster and has a milder flavor, while kale maintains its structure better during longer cooking times. A varied intake of both raw and cooked preparations will help maximize the benefits each green has to offer.

Potential Concerns and Dietary Considerations

While extremely healthy, both kale and spinach have considerations to keep in mind. Spinach's high oxalate levels can hinder calcium absorption and may contribute to kidney stone formation in sensitive individuals, though cooking reduces this effect. Kale, a cruciferous vegetable, contains goitrogens, which can interfere with thyroid function if consumed in very large amounts by those with iodine deficiency or thyroid issues. However, for most people consuming a balanced diet, these compounds are not a significant concern, and cooking deactivates them. Always consult a healthcare provider if you have specific dietary concerns or health conditions.

Conclusion: Which Green Is Right for You?

When deciding between kale and spinach, the verdict is not a clear win for one over the other. Kale does have more calories than spinach by weight, but the difference is minimal in the context of a healthy diet. Both leafy greens are nutritional powerhouses that offer unique benefits. The best approach for optimal health is to incorporate a variety of colorful fruits and vegetables into your diet, including both kale and spinach, to receive the broadest spectrum of nutrients. Choose based on your personal taste, texture preference, and specific nutritional needs to enjoy the benefits of these two fantastic superfoods.

For more detailed nutritional breakdowns and health insights, consider visiting reputable health sites like Healthline.com.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, the calorie difference is minimal and insignificant for weight loss purposes. Both are very low in calories and high in nutrients, making either a great choice for a diet focused on weight management.

Kale has slightly more fiber than spinach, particularly in its raw form. This higher fiber content can contribute to better digestive health and increased feelings of fullness.

Cooking does not significantly change the calorie count of kale or spinach itself. However, it can affect serving size (they wilt and become more compact), meaning a cup of cooked greens will have more calories than a cup of raw greens.

Kale might be a better option. Spinach is very high in oxalates, which can contribute to the formation of calcium oxalate kidney stones. While cooking reduces oxalates in spinach, kale is naturally lower in this compound.

Spinach contains more iron, but its high oxalate content can hinder absorption. Pairing spinach with a vitamin C-rich food (which kale is high in) can help improve iron absorption.

Yes, you can often use them interchangeably, but be mindful of their differences. Kale has a tougher, more fibrous texture and a more bitter taste, while spinach is milder and wilts much faster.

Kale provides significantly more vitamin C than spinach, offering more than twice the amount per 100 grams.

Spinach is a superior source of folate (vitamin B9) compared to kale, making it an excellent choice for pregnant women.

Yes, both kale and spinach are excellent sources of antioxidants that help protect the body's cells from damage and contribute to overall health.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.