Skip to content

Does Salmon Contain Mercury Like Tuna? The Definitive Guide

3 min read

Most fish and shellfish contain at least trace amounts of mercury, but the levels vary significantly across species. This raises a common question: does salmon contain mercury like tuna? The short answer is yes, but the concentration is dramatically lower, making salmon a much safer and more regular choice for consumption.

Quick Summary

While all fish have some mercury, salmon is consistently low on the scale, unlike certain tuna varieties which are known for higher levels. This difference is primarily due to their place in the food chain and lifespan.

Key Points

  • Salmon is Low in Mercury: Due to its shorter lifespan and position lower on the food chain, salmon accumulates very little mercury compared to larger predatory fish.

  • Tuna Varies Greatly: The mercury content in tuna differs significantly by species; for instance, canned light tuna is much lower in mercury than bigeye or fresh/frozen varieties.

  • Farmed Salmon is Safe: Contrary to some myths, both farmed and wild salmon are considered safe and low in mercury according to FDA data.

  • Prioritize Variety: The FDA recommends eating a variety of low-mercury fish 2-3 times per week to maximize nutritional benefits while minimizing risk.

  • High-Mercury Fish to Avoid: Large predatory fish like shark, swordfish, and bigeye tuna contain the highest levels of mercury and should be limited or avoided.

  • Omega-3s vs. Lean Protein: Salmon is richer in omega-3s and Vitamin D, while tuna offers more lean protein, allowing you to choose based on dietary needs.

In This Article

The Science Behind Mercury in Fish

Mercury is a naturally occurring element, but industrial activity has increased its presence in the environment. Once mercury enters water, microorganisms convert it into methylmercury, a highly toxic organic form. This methylmercury is absorbed by aquatic life and bioaccumulates up the food chain. Large, long-lived predatory fish at the top of the food chain, such as shark, swordfish, and some tuna, accumulate the highest levels of methylmercury in their muscle tissue.

Salmon, by contrast, are lower on the food chain and have shorter lifespans compared to larger predatory fish. This means they have less time to accumulate significant amounts of mercury, keeping their overall levels low.

Salmon vs. Tuna: A Mercury Level Comparison

While both are nutritious seafood options, their mercury content is a key difference. Federal agencies like the FDA and EPA provide consumption guidelines based on a fish's mercury levels, categorizing fish as "Best Choices," "Good Choices," or "Choices to Avoid".

Here is a comparison of mercury levels and classifications for common fish:

Fish Species Average Mercury Level (PPM) FDA/EPA Category Key Reason for Level
Salmon 0.022 Best Choice Lower on the food chain, shorter lifespan
Canned Light Tuna Low Best Choice Smaller species (like skipjack) used
Canned Albacore Tuna Moderate Good Choice Larger than skipjack tuna
Bigeye Tuna (fresh/frozen) High (0.689) Choices to Avoid Large, predatory, longer lifespan
Swordfish High (0.995) Choices to Avoid Large, predatory, long lifespan

Wild vs. Farmed Salmon Mercury

A common concern revolves around whether wild or farmed salmon is safer to consume. The reality, supported by data from the FDA, is that both wild and sustainably farmed salmon have consistently low mercury levels. Any perceived difference is often negligible in terms of health risk from mercury. For most consumers, the choice between wild and farmed can come down to taste, texture, and sourcing preferences rather than mercury content.

Beyond Mercury: A Nutrient Showdown

Beyond mercury, comparing salmon and tuna reveals differences in their nutritional profiles. Both are rich in protein, but they excel in different areas.

  • Salmon: A fatty fish, it is an excellent source of anti-inflammatory omega-3 fatty acids (DHA and EPA), which are crucial for heart and brain health. Salmon also contains higher levels of vitamin D, which is essential for bone health and immune function.
  • Tuna: A leaner fish, tuna offers more protein per serving and fewer calories. It is a good source of iron, which helps transport oxygen in the blood, but its omega-3 content is generally lower than salmon's.

Making the Safest Choices for Your Health

To minimize your mercury exposure while maximizing the benefits of seafood, follow these guidelines:

  • Diversify your seafood intake. Eating a variety of fish and shellfish helps to balance out potential contaminants.
  • Stick to low-mercury options. Prioritize fish from the FDA's "Best Choices" list, which includes salmon, shrimp, sardines, and canned light tuna.
  • Limit or avoid high-mercury fish. Reduce your consumption of larger predatory fish like swordfish, king mackerel, and bigeye tuna, which are classified as "Choices to Avoid" or "Good Choices" for certain populations.
  • Consult advisories. If you fish recreationally, check local fish consumption advisories, as mercury levels in specific waterways can vary.

Following these steps ensures that you can safely enjoy the significant nutritional benefits that seafood provides. For more detailed information on which fish to eat, you can refer to the official FDA guidelines. Learn more about FDA fish consumption advice here.

Conclusion

In summary, while does salmon contain mercury like tuna is a reasonable question, the answer reveals a significant difference in safety profiles. Salmon, whether wild or farmed, contains very low levels of mercury and is considered a “Best Choice” for regular consumption. Tuna, on the other hand, requires more caution, with mercury levels varying greatly by species. By understanding the factors that influence mercury accumulation and following consumption guidelines, you can confidently include low-mercury options like salmon in your diet to reap its valuable health benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, mercury levels vary significantly among tuna species. Canned light tuna (often skipjack) is considered a low-mercury 'Best Choice,' while larger, longer-lived species like bigeye tuna are high in mercury and should be avoided.

Like other fish, salmon absorb methylmercury from the water and through their diet. However, because salmon are smaller, have shorter lifespans, and eat lower on the food chain, they accumulate far less mercury than large predators.

No, studies have consistently shown that both farmed and wild salmon contain remarkably low levels of mercury, and are both considered 'Best Choices' by the FDA.

The FDA and EPA recommend eating 2 to 3 servings (8 to 12 ounces) per week of a variety of low-mercury fish, such as salmon.

Fish with the highest mercury levels include shark, swordfish, king mackerel, marlin, orange roughy, and bigeye tuna. These should be limited or avoided, especially by vulnerable populations.

Yes, for low-mercury fish like salmon, the nutritional benefits—including heart-healthy omega-3s and vitamin D—far outweigh any minimal risk from trace mercury levels for the vast majority of people.

The organic form of mercury, known as methylmercury, is the most hazardous to human health and is the type that bioaccumulates in fish tissue.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.