Skip to content

Is Canned Mackerel Better Than Canned Salmon?

4 min read

According to the USDA, both canned mackerel and salmon are excellent sources of protein and omega-3 fatty acids, making them staples for health-conscious consumers. But is canned mackerel better than canned salmon? The answer depends on your specific nutritional needs and preferences.

Quick Summary

This guide compares canned mackerel and salmon based on their nutritional profiles, including omega-3 fats, protein, and vitamin content, along with differences in taste, cost, and mercury levels. It provides a comprehensive analysis to help you decide which canned fish is the best choice for your diet.

Key Points

  • Omega-3 Content: Mackerel can sometimes contain higher omega-3 levels, but it varies by species; always check the label.

  • Protein Source: Mackerel often has a slightly higher protein content per serving compared to canned salmon.

  • Mercury Exposure: Wild-caught pink and sockeye salmon are typically lower in mercury than many mackerel species, making them safer for regular consumption.

  • Taste and Texture: Mackerel has a stronger, richer flavour and softer texture, while salmon is milder and firmer.

  • Sustainability Varies: Atlantic mackerel has had sustainability downgrades, so look for certifications like MSC when choosing.

  • Calcium Source: Canned salmon often includes edible bones, providing a significant boost of calcium not typically found in canned mackerel.

  • Cost-effectiveness: Canned mackerel is generally more budget-friendly than canned salmon.

In This Article

Canned Mackerel vs. Canned Salmon: A Nutritional Breakdown

Choosing between canned mackerel and canned salmon can be tricky, as both are hailed for their health benefits. While both offer substantial nutritional value, a deeper look at their differences reveals which might be the superior choice for your needs. Factors like omega-3 content, protein levels, and potential mercury exposure are all important to consider.

Omega-3 Fatty Acids: A Crucial Distinction

Omega-3 fatty acids, specifically EPA and DHA, are vital for heart health, brain function, and reducing inflammation. While many sources suggest salmon is the omega-3 king, some comparisons indicate that certain species of canned mackerel may contain even higher levels. However, sources differ, so it is important to check the specific type of fish and brand. For instance, a small fatty fish like mackerel is sometimes cited as having a higher omega-3 concentration per 100g than some types of salmon. Conversely, canned sockeye salmon offers over 1,000mg per serving. Always check the nutritional information on the label for the most accurate data.

Protein Content: Building Blocks of a Healthy Diet

Both fish are excellent sources of high-quality protein, which is essential for building and repairing tissues and keeping you full. A 100g serving of mackerel generally provides more protein than a similar serving of salmon. For example, studies show mackerel can offer around 23-24 grams of protein, while salmon contains approximately 19-22 grams. For those prioritizing protein intake, canned mackerel often has a slight edge.

Mercury Levels: A Potential Concern

Mercury levels in fish are a key consideration for frequent consumers, especially pregnant women and children. As a smaller fish, mackerel typically has lower mercury content than larger fish like some species of tuna, making it a safer option for regular consumption. However, some larger species of mackerel, such as king mackerel, can contain higher levels of mercury. Conversely, wild-caught salmon, especially smaller pink and sockeye varieties, are known for their very low mercury levels. Consumers should be aware of the specific species within the can when making a choice.

Taste, Texture, and Cost: What to Expect

  • Taste: Canned mackerel tends to have a more robust, 'fishy' flavour, and a softer texture compared to canned salmon. Canned salmon, especially pink or sockeye, is typically milder in taste and firmer in texture.
  • Texture: Mackerel has a tender, delicate texture, while canned salmon is fleshier and firmer.
  • Cost: Mackerel is often more affordable than salmon, making it a budget-friendly alternative for those seeking nutrient-dense canned fish.

Comparison Table: Canned Mackerel vs. Canned Salmon

Feature Canned Mackerel Canned Salmon
Omega-3s (per 100g) Can be very high (e.g., >2000mg depending on species) High (e.g., >1000mg depending on species and canned variety)
Protein (per 100g) Slightly higher (e.g., ~23-24g) High (e.g., ~19-22g)
Mercury Levels Low, but varies with species Very low, especially wild-caught pink or sockeye
Taste Stronger, more pronounced 'fishy' flavour Milder, more delicate flavour
Texture Softer and more delicate Firmer and fleshier
Cost Generally more affordable Often more expensive
Sustainability Varies; Atlantic mackerel is amber-rated by MCS due to overfishing Generally more sustainable, especially MSC-certified Pacific varieties
Notable Vitamins B12, D, Selenium D, B12, Calcium (with bones)

Making the Best Choice for You

Ultimately, the better choice between canned mackerel and canned salmon depends on your personal health goals and taste preferences. If you are focused on maximizing omega-3 and protein intake on a budget, and you enjoy a richer flavour, mackerel might be the right fit. However, if a milder taste, firmer texture, and the highest sustainability ratings are your priority, particularly if consuming frequently, then wild-caught canned salmon is an excellent alternative.

Consider your overall diet and health factors, such as potential mercury exposure from other seafood, and always check the label to make the most informed decision. Both are convenient, nutritious, and affordable additions to a healthy diet.

Conclusion

While both canned mackerel and canned salmon provide significant nutritional advantages, they are not identical. Canned mackerel often provides a higher concentration of omega-3s and protein at a lower price point, but can come with sustainability concerns and a stronger flavor. Canned salmon, particularly sustainably sourced wild Pacific varieties, offers a milder taste, a firmer texture, and a more dependable sustainability profile, along with a great nutrient boost. Your ideal canned fish comes down to balancing these factors to meet your dietary priorities. The best practice is to incorporate both into your meal rotation to enjoy a variety of flavours and nutritional benefits. For more information on seafood sustainability, check the Marine Stewardship Council.

Mackerel and Salmon: Preparation Ideas

Here are some delicious and easy ways to prepare your canned mackerel or salmon.

Canned Mackerel

  • Mackerel Pate: Blend canned mackerel with cream cheese, lemon juice, black pepper, and fresh dill. Serve with crackers or toast.
  • Simple Salad Topping: Flake canned mackerel over a mixed green salad with a vinaigrette dressing. The rich flavour holds up well to robust greens.
  • Pan-fried Mackerel Cakes: Mix canned mackerel with breadcrumbs, egg, finely chopped onion, and seasoning. Form into patties and pan-fry until golden brown. Serve with tartar sauce or a squeeze of lemon.

Canned Salmon

  • Salmon Salad Sandwich: Use canned salmon instead of tuna for a healthier twist on a classic. Mix with mayonnaise, finely chopped celery, and a dash of pepper.
  • Quick Salmon Kedgeree: Mix canned salmon with cooked rice, hard-boiled eggs, and curry powder. Perfect for a quick, warming lunch.
  • Salmon Burgers: Combine canned salmon with breadcrumbs, fresh parsley, and an egg to make flavorful burgers. Grill or pan-fry and serve on a bun with your favourite toppings.

Frequently Asked Questions

The omega-3 content can vary by species, but certain types of mackerel may contain higher levels than salmon. However, some comparisons show salmon is richer overall. Consumers should always check the nutrition facts on the specific can they purchase for the most accurate information.

Mackerel is typically a smaller fish, and therefore accumulates less mercury than larger predator fish like some types of tuna. However, consumers should be cautious of larger species of mackerel, such as king mackerel, which may have higher mercury levels. Smaller wild-caught salmon varieties are considered one of the safest options for low mercury.

Yes, canned salmon can be a better source of calcium, especially when the edible bones are included in the canning process. This is a significant nutritional benefit that canned mackerel does not typically provide.

Canned mackerel has a stronger, richer, and more pronounced 'fishy' flavour, with a softer texture. Canned salmon is known for its milder flavour and firmer, flakier texture.

Canned mackerel is generally more affordable than canned salmon, making it a great budget-friendly option for adding omega-3s and protein to your diet.

Sustainability depends on the species and fishing practices. While many canned salmon varieties, particularly MSC-certified wild Pacific salmon, are sustainably managed, Atlantic mackerel populations have faced overfishing issues. It is best to look for a sustainability certification on the packaging.

Yes, you can substitute canned mackerel for salmon in many recipes, though you should be aware of the difference in flavour and texture. Mackerel has a richer, oilier taste and softer consistency, which may change the dish's overall profile.

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.