Skip to content

Is Cod More Fatty Than Salmon? A Nutritional Comparison

3 min read

According to the National Institutes of Health, cod is classified as a lean fish, while salmon is considered a fatty fish, clearly establishing the difference in their fat content. Understanding this fundamental distinction is key for anyone comparing whether cod is more fatty than salmon for their dietary needs.

Quick Summary

This article provides a comprehensive nutritional breakdown comparing the fat content of cod and salmon, including omega-3 fatty acids, calories, protein, and other key nutrients to help inform your dietary choices.

Key Points

  • Cod is a lean fish: It has significantly lower fat and calorie content compared to salmon.

  • Salmon is a fatty fish: It contains substantially more fat and calories per serving than cod.

  • Omega-3 fatty acids are higher in salmon: Salmon provides much higher levels of heart-healthy omega-3s, making it more beneficial for brain and heart health.

  • Cod is a high-protein, low-calorie choice: It is an excellent option for those focused on weight management due to its lean protein content and fewer calories.

  • Nutrient density varies: Salmon offers a broader and more concentrated range of vitamins and minerals, including B vitamins and selenium, though both are nutritious.

  • Both have distinct health benefits: The best choice depends on your specific nutritional needs, whether prioritizing healthy fats or a lean protein.

In This Article

Cod vs. Salmon: The Fundamental Fat Difference

When it comes to fat content, the distinction between cod and salmon is straightforward: salmon is significantly fattier than cod. Cod is classified as a 'lean' or 'whitefish,' while salmon is considered a 'fatty' or 'oily' fish. This difference in fat directly influences their calorie counts and nutritional profiles, with salmon containing notably more fat and calories per serving. The fat in salmon, however, is a key reason for its health-promoting reputation, as it is packed with heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids. In contrast, cod is prized for being a low-calorie, lean protein source, making it a favorite for those managing their weight.

Comparing Fat and Omega-3s

The most significant nutritional difference between these two popular fish lies in their fatty acid composition. The fatty tissue in salmon is where its potent omega-3s are stored, and this is why it has a much higher concentration than cod. For context, a 3.5-ounce serving of cooked wild Atlantic salmon provides approximately 2,208 milligrams of omega-3 fatty acids, whereas the same serving of Atlantic cod contains only around 171 milligrams. This disparity highlights why health guidelines often recommend incorporating fatty fish like salmon into one's diet to meet omega-3 needs.

Nutritional Table: Cod vs. Salmon (3-Ounce Cooked Serving)

Nutrient Wild Atlantic Salmon Atlantic Cod
Calories 182 105
Total Fat Approx. 10g Approx. 1g
Omega-3s (EPA/DHA) Approx. 2,208 mg Approx. 171 mg
Protein 25.4 g 22.8 g
Vitamin B12 (% DV) 45% 15%
Selenium (% DV) High Also a good source

Beyond Fat: Key Nutritional Differences

While fat is the primary differentiator, there are other nutritional nuances to consider when choosing between cod and salmon. For those monitoring calorie intake, cod offers a leaner alternative with fewer calories per serving, providing a high-quality protein boost without the additional fat. However, salmon provides a more robust profile of vitamins and minerals, including significantly higher amounts of B vitamins and selenium.

For example, salmon delivers a much higher percentage of the Daily Value for Vitamin B12 and Vitamin B6 compared to cod. B vitamins are essential for converting food into energy and maintaining healthy skin and hair. Furthermore, the omega-3 fatty acids and astaxanthin found in salmon contribute to its reputation for supporting brain health and reducing inflammation. Cod liver oil supplements, in contrast, are often a source of concentrated omega-3s, highlighting that cod fillet itself is not the primary source.

Considerations for Mercury Content and Sustainability

When making a choice, it is also important to consider potential contaminants like mercury and the sustainability of the fish. As a general rule, larger, longer-lived predatory fish tend to have higher mercury levels. Salmon is generally considered to have lower mercury levels than cod, although both contain some mercury. According to one source, you can safely consume more servings of salmon per week than cod. Wild-caught options for both fish are often recommended over farmed alternatives, which may contain higher levels of other contaminants and can raise sustainability concerns. When shopping, look for certifications from organizations that promote sustainable fishing practices.

Conclusion

To conclude, is cod more fatty than salmon? No, cod is a notably leaner fish, while salmon is the significantly fattier one. The choice between them ultimately depends on your dietary goals. If your priority is a lower-calorie, lean protein source, cod is the superior option. However, if you are looking to maximize your intake of heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin B, and other nutrients, the richer, fattier salmon is the clear winner. Both fish offer valuable health benefits, so incorporating a variety of seafood into your diet, including both lean and fatty types, is an excellent approach to balanced nutrition.

Optional Outbound Link: Learn more about the specific benefits of omega-3 fatty acids from reliable health sources.(https://www.lipid.org/sites/default/files/omega-3_fats1.pdf)

Frequently Asked Questions

Not necessarily; 'healthier' depends on your nutritional goals. Salmon is richer in omega-3 fatty acids and certain vitamins, while cod is a leaner, lower-calorie protein source ideal for weight management.

Salmon has significantly more omega-3 fatty acids than cod. The fat in salmon is the source of its high concentration of beneficial omega-3s.

No, cod is considered a lean fish with a very low fat content. Salmon, in contrast, is classified as a fatty or oily fish.

Salmon has more calories than cod. For instance, a 3-ounce cooked serving of wild Atlantic salmon has about 182 calories, while the same serving of Atlantic cod has approximately 105 calories.

Cod is a better option for weight loss due to its lower calorie and fat content, offering lean protein with minimal fat.

You can substitute cod for salmon in many recipes, especially those where lean, flaky whitefish is desired. However, you will miss out on the higher omega-3 content and richer flavor of salmon.

Cod generally has lower mercury levels than some larger predatory fish, but slightly more than salmon. It is still considered safe to consume regularly within recommended guidelines.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.