Skip to content

Is Ham or Bacon More Fatty? A Nutritional Showdown

4 min read

According to nutritional data, standard American bacon, derived from the fatty pork belly, contains significantly more total fat per 100 grams than most cuts of cured ham. This fundamental difference in the source cut provides the answer when you ask: is ham or bacon more fatty?

Quick Summary

This guide compares the fat content of ham and bacon by exploring their cuts, preparation methods, and nutritional values to determine which is the fattier option.

Key Points

  • Bacon is Fattier: Traditional bacon is typically much higher in total fat and saturated fat than most cuts of ham.

  • Cut is Key: Bacon comes from the fatty pork belly, while ham is from the leaner hind leg, explaining the fat discrepancy.

  • Preparation Matters: Cooking bacon renders out some fat, but it still remains a higher-fat product than most ham.

  • Not All Bacon is Equal: Leaner options like Canadian bacon exist, which is a loin cut and more comparable to ham in fat content.

  • Mind the Sodium: While bacon is fattier, many cured hams can contain a higher sodium content, so moderation is key for both.

  • Read Labels for Certainty: The best way to know the specific nutritional profile is to check the packaging, as fat content can vary by brand and cut.

In This Article

The Source and Cut: The Defining Difference

The most significant factor determining the fat content of ham versus bacon is the specific cut of the pig from which they are sourced. While both are processed pork products, their origins are distinct:

  • Bacon: Typically comes from the pork belly, a very fatty section of the pig. The characteristic strips of bacon feature a high ratio of fat to meat, which is what gives it its rich flavor and crispy texture when cooked.
  • Ham: Is traditionally cut from the hind leg of the pig, a much leaner and muscular part of the animal. Because of its origin, ham naturally has a lower fat content than belly-derived bacon, although this can vary depending on the specific cut and how it's prepared.

This core anatomical difference sets the stage for the nutritional variations found in the final products. While preparation methods and curing processes also play a role, the fundamental nature of the cut is the primary differentiator in fat levels.

Bacon vs. Ham: A Comparison Table

To provide a clear, side-by-side comparison, here is a breakdown of the nutritional profiles for typical 100-gram servings of cooked bacon and ham, based on data compiled from nutritional sources like the USDA.

Nutrient (per 100g) Cooked Bacon (Strips) Cured Ham (Regular)
Total Fat approx. 37g approx. 5-7.7g
Saturated Fat approx. 13g approx. 1.7-2.6g
Calories approx. 541 kcal approx. 132-151 kcal
Protein approx. 37g approx. 21g
Sodium approx. 1700-1900mg approx. 1000-1275mg

Note: Nutritional information can vary significantly depending on the specific product, brand, and cooking method. Canadian bacon is substantially leaner than regular bacon.

The Impact of Preparation and Cut Variety

While the table highlights the general differences, the final fat content is influenced by several other factors. Bacon's preparation method is a major variable. When you cook bacon, a substantial amount of fat renders out, and if drained properly, the final product's fat content is lower than its raw state. The degree of crispiness also matters; crispier bacon loses more fat.

Conversely, ham comes in a wide variety of cuts, which also impacts its fat content. Here's a brief list of some ham types and their fat profiles:

  • Canadian Bacon: A lean loin cut, it is much lower in fat than traditional streaky bacon.
  • Lean Cured Ham: Many deli hams and lean cuts are processed to have very low fat, making them a healthier choice.
  • Country Ham: Some country hams and other cured specialty hams can contain higher fat levels, though still typically less than standard bacon strips.

The Cooking Process and Other Nutritional Impacts

Bacon's preparation, particularly how much fat is rendered and drained, directly affects its final fat and calorie totals. For example, baked bacon often results in more fat being removed compared to pan-fried. Another point of difference is sodium. While bacon is high in sodium, many types of cured ham, especially country hams, are also notoriously high in sodium due to the curing process. Therefore, for individuals monitoring sodium intake, both should be consumed in moderation.

Beyond Fat: Comparing Overall Nutritional Value

Looking beyond just fat reveals more about how these meats fit into a diet. Both are good sources of protein and provide essential micronutrients. Ham is often richer in certain B vitamins, such as thiamin and niacin, while bacon can provide more of others. However, both are processed meats, and their consumption in large quantities has been linked to health risks, so moderation is key. Ultimately, a balanced diet should include a variety of protein sources rather than relying heavily on one processed meat over the other.

Making a Healthier Choice

When faced with the choice, here are a few tips to help you make a decision based on your dietary needs:

  1. Read the Label: The most reliable way to compare is to check the specific nutritional information on the packaging of the exact products you are considering.
  2. Mind the Cut: If prioritizing lower fat, opt for lean ham cuts or Canadian bacon over streaky bacon.
  3. Portion Control: Given that both are high in sodium and, for bacon, fat, consuming smaller portions is always the best strategy for a balanced diet.
  4. Consider Preparation: The cooking method for bacon can drastically alter its fat content. Baking or air-frying can remove more fat than pan-frying.
  5. Focus on Balance: Incorporate a wide range of protein sources into your diet and view ham and bacon as occasional additions rather than staples.

Conclusion: The Clear Winner for Lower Fat

In the definitive showdown between ham and bacon regarding fat content, bacon is the clear winner for being the fattier option. The fundamental difference lies in their source cuts—pork belly for bacon and the leaner hind leg for ham. While some variation exists between specific cuts, with options like Canadian bacon being much leaner, traditional streaky bacon consistently contains significantly more fat and calories per serving. For those seeking a lower-fat pork option, a lean cut of ham is the better choice, but always remember to check the nutritional label for the most accurate information on any specific product.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, Canadian bacon is a leaner loin cut and typically has a lower fat content than traditional streaky bacon, making it nutritionally closer to many cuts of ham.

Cooking bacon does render out a significant amount of fat, reducing the final fat and calorie count of the cooked strips compared to their raw state.

Determining which is 'healthier' depends on dietary priorities. Bacon has higher fat, but ham is often higher in sodium. Both are processed meats and best consumed in moderation as part of a balanced diet.

The primary reason is the cut of meat. Bacon is typically made from the pork belly, a naturally fattier cut, whereas ham is made from the hind leg, which is a leaner, more muscular cut.

Most typical ham cuts have less fat than standard bacon, but fattier specialty hams exist. The most accurate way to compare is by checking the nutritional label of the specific product.

For a 100-gram serving, cooked bacon can have over 30 grams of fat, while a regular cured ham might have around 5-8 grams. This is a general comparison and varies by product.

Some individuals on low-carb diets like keto choose bacon for its low-carb content, despite its high fat. However, they should remain mindful of the high saturated fat and sodium levels.

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.