Skip to content

Is Lard or Crisco Better for You?

4 min read

For decades, Crisco was marketed as a healthier, plant-based alternative to lard, a perception that is now largely debunked. Deciding if lard or Crisco is better for you requires a closer look at their processing, nutritional content, and historical context, especially considering Crisco's reformulation to eliminate trans fats.

Quick Summary

This article examines the nutritional profiles, processing methods, and health implications of lard and Crisco, detailing the historical shift in dietary perceptions and how modern formulations have changed the comparison. It offers a comprehensive overview to help inform your cooking and baking choices.

Key Points

  • Modern Crisco is Trans-Fat-Free: The biggest historical health concern with Crisco, its trans-fat content, has been addressed through reformulation due to an FDA ban.

  • Pure Lard is Less Processed: Lard, especially high-quality rendered or leaf lard, is a natural, animal-based fat that undergoes minimal processing compared to modern Crisco.

  • Lard Has a Better Fat Profile: Pure lard contains a higher proportion of healthy monounsaturated fat and less saturated fat than previously thought, making it a more favorable fat compositionally than butter.

  • Flavor is a Differentiator: For baking, lard imparts a traditional, richer flavor and creates exceptional flakiness, while Crisco offers a neutral taste and softer texture.

  • Consider the Source for Lard: Look for pure rendered or leaf lard from butchers or reputable sources, as some shelf-stable store brands may still contain hydrogenated fats.

  • Moderation is Crucial for All Fats: Regardless of the fat chosen, both lard and Crisco are calorically dense and should be used judiciously as part of a balanced nutritional plan.

  • Processed Lard Can be Hydrogenated: Some commercial lards are processed with hydrogenation to increase shelf stability, so checking the product label is essential to avoid unwanted additives.

In This Article

A Tale of Two Fats: Lard vs. Crisco

In the early 20th century, a dramatic shift occurred in American kitchens with the introduction of Crisco, a vegetable-based shortening. Marketed as a healthier alternative to animal-based fats like lard, Crisco's popularity soared. However, the story isn't so simple, and modern nutritional science has forced a re-evaluation of this long-held belief. Lard, rendered from pig fat, and Crisco, a processed vegetable oil product, are fundamentally different, and the question of which is better for you has a complex answer.

The Nutritional Showdown: Lard vs. Crisco

The primary difference between lard and Crisco lies in their origin and chemical composition. Lard is a natural animal product, while Crisco is a heavily processed vegetable shortening. A closer look at their nutritional makeup reveals key differences that influence their health impact.

  • Lard: Pure, unhydrogenated lard is a mix of saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fats. Interestingly, it contains less saturated fat than butter and is a good source of monounsaturated fats, similar to olive oil. Leaf lard, considered the highest quality, comes from the visceral fat around a pig's kidneys and is especially prized for baking.
  • Crisco: The original Crisco formula was made from partially hydrogenated oils and contained trans fats, which are highly detrimental to heart health. After widespread health concerns and regulations, Crisco was reformulated to be trans-fat-free. The current version uses a blend of vegetable oils, including fully hydrogenated palm and soybean oils, to achieve its semi-solid state. While it contains 0g of trans fat per serving, it's still a highly processed fat.

The Health Implications: What You Need to Know

The health debate surrounding these fats is ongoing. Historically, Crisco was vilified for its trans-fat content, while lard was shunned for being an animal fat. Today, the conversation is more nuanced.

The Problem with Trans Fats

The original Crisco, along with other partially hydrogenated vegetable shortenings, contained artificial trans fats, which were linked to significant health risks, including increased LDL (bad) cholesterol and decreased HDL (good) cholesterol. The FDA banned partially hydrogenated oils in 2018, leading to Crisco's reformulation. This change addressed the most significant health concern with the product.

Saturated vs. Unsaturated Fats

Lard's fat profile offers a blend of saturated and unsaturated fats, with a significant amount of monounsaturated fat. Crisco's current formula, while trans-fat-free, relies on fully hydrogenated palm and soybean oils, which contributes to its saturated fat content. Some nutritionists argue that even though Crisco is now free of artificial trans fats, the processing involved and the use of fully hydrogenated oil may still pose health concerns.

Comparison Table: Lard vs. Crisco

Feature Lard (Pure, Unhydrogenated) Crisco (Modern, Trans-Fat-Free)
Origin Rendered animal fat (pork) Processed vegetable oils (soybean, palm)
Processing Minimally processed (rendered) Heavily processed (hydrogenated, interesterified)
Trans Fats 0g (in pure form) 0g per serving (as per FDA rules)
Flavor Mild, rich flavor, depending on type Neutral, flavorless
Saturated Fat Lower than butter, moderate amount Moderate amount, from fully hydrogenated oils
Monounsaturated Fat Good source Good source
Baking Texture Flaky, tender results (e.g., pie crusts) Tender, soft cookies; flaky crusts

The Modern Health Perspective

Many health experts now view pure, unhydrogenated lard as a more natural, less processed option than Crisco. Lard from pasture-raised pigs can even contain fat-soluble vitamins and healthy fats that support overall wellness. While moderation is key for any fat, the historical narrative that Crisco was superior has been thoroughly challenged. However, it's crucial to distinguish between pure lard and commercially processed lard, which can be hydrogenated and contain additives. Always check the label for processed versions.

Conclusion: Making the Right Choice for Your Kitchen

Ultimately, deciding if lard or Crisco is better for you depends on your priorities. For those seeking a less-processed, traditional fat with a richer flavor profile and potential nutritional benefits, pure, unhydrogenated lard is the clear winner. It excels in applications like flaky pie crusts and is a favorite among culinary traditionalists. However, Crisco's modern, trans-fat-free formula provides a neutral-flavored, reliable, and shelf-stable fat suitable for vegetarian baking and creating tender cookies. The old perception that Crisco was the unequivocally healthier choice is no longer valid. The best practice is to understand the composition of what you're using and consume all fats in moderation as part of a balanced diet. The real issue is often the quantity and context of consumption, not just the single ingredient itself.

Essential Facts on Lard vs. Crisco

  • Original Crisco vs. Modern Crisco: The health risks of original Crisco were primarily due to trans fats from partial hydrogenation, a process banned by the FDA, leading to a reformulated, trans-fat-free product.
  • Lard is not just saturated fat: Contrary to popular belief, pure lard contains a significant amount of heart-healthy monounsaturated fats, along with some saturated and polyunsaturated fats.
  • Processing makes a difference: While pure rendered lard is minimally processed, shelf-stable lard found in some supermarkets is often hydrogenated, which can introduce trans fats. Always check labels.
  • Flavor is a key distinction: Lard provides a richer, more traditional flavor to baked goods like pie crusts, whereas modern Crisco is flavorless, making it ideal for recipes where a neutral fat is preferred.
  • Sourcing matters for lard: For the highest quality and mildest flavor, bakers often seek out leaf lard, which is fat from around the pig's kidneys, or render their own fat at home.
  • Neither is a health food: Both lard and Crisco are calorie-dense fats that should be consumed in moderation within a balanced diet.
  • Trans fats in Crisco aren't completely gone: The FDA allows products with less than 0.5 grams of trans fat per serving to be labeled as 0g, so trace amounts may still exist, though the significant health risks of the original formula are gone.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, not necessarily. While modern Crisco is free of trans fats, pure, unhydrogenated lard is a more natural, less processed fat with a beneficial fatty acid profile, including a good amount of monounsaturated fat.

No, there are different types. Pure rendered lard is minimally processed, while some shelf-stable commercial lards are hydrogenated for a longer shelf life and may contain additives.

Leaf lard, which comes from around a pig's kidneys, is considered the highest quality for baking due to its mild flavor and creamy texture.

Yes, they can often be used interchangeably, especially in baking. However, keep in mind that lard will add a richer flavor, while Crisco is neutral.

Many bakers prefer lard for creating flaky, tender pie crusts due to its distinct texture and composition.

Lard is an animal fat derived from pigs, while Crisco is a vegetable shortening made from processed vegetable oils like soybean and palm oil.

The original Crisco formula, produced for much of the 20th century, contained trans fats from partial hydrogenation. The current version has been reformulated and is trans-fat-free per serving.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.