Skip to content

Is Lunchly actually healthier than Lunchables?

5 min read

According to reports, Lunchly was marketed as a healthier alternative to Lunchables, with social media influencers highlighting its lower calorie and sugar content compared to its competitor. However, the full nutritional and safety picture reveals a more complex story that challenges these initial claims.

Quick Summary

Despite claims of being a healthier option, experts found Lunchly and Lunchables to be similar ultra-processed products with significant nutritional drawbacks like high sodium and processed meats. Tests revealed concerning levels of lead in both brands, and Lunchly's lower sugar content is achieved using artificial sweeteners.

Key Points

  • No Significant Health Advantage: Experts, including Consumer Reports, confirm Lunchly is not significantly healthier than Lunchables despite influencer marketing claims.

  • Artificial Sweeteners Used: Lunchly's lower sugar count is achieved by replacing sugar with artificial sweeteners in its Prime drink, which is not recommended for children by some health experts.

  • High Sodium & Processed Meats: Both Lunchly and Lunchables are ultra-processed foods high in sodium and containing processed meats linked to health risks.

  • Concerning Heavy Metal Levels: Tests found concerning levels of lead and cadmium in Lunchly kits, similar to previous findings in Lunchables.

  • Quality Control Issues: Lunchly faced viral reports of moldy cheese, raising questions about product safety and quality control.

  • Homemade is Healthier: Nutrition experts consistently recommend homemade, whole-food alternatives for the healthiest lunch option for kids.

  • Influencer Marketing Warning: The immense marketing power of Lunchly's creators can influence kids' decisions, potentially overriding nutritional concerns.

In This Article

The Viral Launch vs. The Nutritional Reality

Launched in late 2024 by YouTube giants MrBeast, KSI, and Logan Paul, Lunchly quickly garnered massive attention as a direct competitor to the long-standing Lunchables. Capitalizing on their immense social media followings, the creators promoted Lunchly as a "better-for-you" option, often showcasing comparisons on their channels and website that highlighted lower calories and sugar. However, a closer inspection by nutrition experts and consumer advocacy groups like Consumer Reports reveals that Lunchly is not the nutritional upgrade its marketing suggests. While there are minor differences, both products remain highly processed convenience meals with similar concerning ingredients.

Deconstructing the Healthier Claims

Lunchly's marketing primarily focuses on specific nutritional metrics, while strategically omitting others. The inclusion of a Prime Hydration drink and a Feastables chocolate bar creates a different nutritional profile than a standard Lunchables kit, but not necessarily a healthier one.

  • Calories and Sugar: Lunchly kits do generally have fewer calories and less sugar than their Lunchables counterparts. For instance, one Lunchly turkey kit has 230 calories and 7 grams of sugar, compared to 310 calories and 21 grams of sugar in a comparable Lunchables. However, this lower sugar count in Lunchly is largely because the Prime drink uses artificial sweeteners (sucralose and acesulfame potassium), not a reduction in overall processed content. Health experts, including the World Health Organization (WHO), question the benefits of substituting sugar with artificial sweeteners, especially for children.

  • Sodium and Saturated Fat: Both brands are criticized for their high sodium content, which can account for a significant portion of a child's daily recommended intake in a single meal. While Lunchly often omits these figures in its marketing comparisons, a typical kit can deliver nearly half of a young child's daily sodium limit. Similarly, the saturated fat levels between the two are very similar.

  • Processed Ingredients: At their core, both Lunchly and Lunchables are ultra-processed foods. They contain processed meats, refined grains, and various additives. Nutritionists and health organizations advise against regular consumption of ultra-processed foods, linking them to health issues like obesity, diabetes, and certain cancers.

Food Safety and Quality Concerns

Beyond the daily nutrition, both brands have faced scrutiny over potential food safety issues, particularly regarding contaminants and quality control.

Heavy Metals

In early 2025, Consumer Reports tested Lunchly kits for heavy metals, finding detectable levels of lead and cadmium. These findings are especially concerning for children, as cumulative heavy metal exposure can affect cognitive development. The lead levels were comparable to what Consumer Reports had previously found in Lunchables. Notably, tests indicated that the Feastables chocolate bar in the Lunchly kits was a significant contributor to the overall lead content.

Mold and Quality Control

Following Lunchly's launch, social media and YouTube were filled with reports and videos from consumers finding mold in their kits. This led to viral backlash and questions about the product's quality control. While Lunchly's creators dismissed the claims as isolated incidents and mentioned standard food safety inspections, the widespread reports raised concerns about the consistency and safety of the product.

Comparison Table: Lunchly vs. Lunchables

Feature Lunchly Lunchables Analysis
Key Claim "Healthier" alternative Convenient, easy-to-pack Both are ultra-processed convenience foods.
Sweetener Artificial sweeteners (Prime drink) Sugar, fruit juice (Capri Sun drink) Artificial sweeteners are not necessarily a healthier choice, especially for children.
Sodium Level High; often comparable to Lunchables High; often comparable to Lunchly Both contain significant sodium, raising health concerns.
Processing Ultra-processed (processed meats, refined carbs) Ultra-processed (processed meats, refined carbs) Fundamentally similar levels of processing.
Protein Protein content is comparable Protein content is comparable The emphasis on protein in marketing is misleading; levels are similar.
Contaminants Detected lead and cadmium in tests Detected lead and cadmium in tests (previous reports) Both show concerning levels of heavy metals.
Added Item Feastables chocolate bar & Prime drink Various small treats & Capri Sun drink Both include a treat, impacting overall healthiness and contributing to contaminants.

Building Your Own Healthier Alternative

Since neither Lunchly nor Lunchables provides a genuinely healthy meal option for daily consumption, experts often recommend creating your own homemade version. This approach allows for full control over ingredients, providing a balanced, nutritious, and safe alternative.

Here are a few ideas for a DIY lunch kit:

  • Mini Pizzas: Use whole-wheat pita bread, low-sodium marinara sauce, and real mozzarella cheese cubes. Add sliced bell peppers or cherry tomatoes for veggies.
  • Turkey and Cheese "Stackers": Fill a bento box with whole-grain crackers, nitrate-free deli turkey slices, and cubes of natural cheddar cheese. Include baby carrots and cucumber slices on the side.
  • Nachos with Dip: Pack whole-grain tortilla chips with a container of homemade guacamole or low-sodium salsa. Include a small container of plain Greek yogurt for added protein and healthy fats.
  • Protein Box: Combine hard-boiled eggs, cheese sticks, and a handful of mixed nuts. Add fresh berries and a few whole-wheat crackers for a complete meal.
  • Tortellini and Sauce: Pre-cook whole-wheat cheese tortellini and pack it with a small container of low-sugar marinara sauce for dipping. Add a side of fresh fruit and raw veggies with hummus.

The Verdict: No Real Winner, Only Better Choices

Ultimately, the question of whether Lunchly is actually healthier than Lunchables is a red herring. While Lunchly's marketing might highlight certain figures, both are ultra-processed products that do not contribute meaningfully to a balanced, nutritious diet for kids. The presence of high sodium, processed meats, and potential contaminants like lead in both brands suggests that neither is a recommended option for regular consumption.

The most nutritious and safest lunch remains one prepared at home with fresh, whole foods. This allows parents to provide a meal that is genuinely healthy, affordable, and customizable to their child's preferences. The best strategy is to look past the flashy influencer marketing and choose whole-food alternatives.

The Problem with Ultra-Processed Foods

It's crucial to understand why nutritionists raise concerns about ultra-processed foods, regardless of brand. These products typically contain ingredients that have undergone significant industrial processing, such as additives, emulsifiers, refined grains, and high levels of added sugar, salt, and fat. They are specifically designed to be hyper-palatable, inexpensive, and have a long shelf life, but often lack essential nutrients like fiber, vitamins, and minerals. Regular consumption of such foods has been linked to numerous health problems, including increased risk of obesity, heart disease, diabetes, and certain cancers. The marketing surrounding these products, particularly when led by popular social media figures, can create an added layer of appeal that makes them even harder for children and parents to resist, compounding the potential health risks. The core issue isn't just a comparison between two products, but the broader impact of a diet high in ultra-processed convenience meals. The BMJ has published research on this topic, further reinforcing expert concerns.

The Best Lunch for Kids Is Still Made at Home: A Guide to Packing Nutritious Meals

Conclusion

Despite clever marketing and social media hype, a detailed nutritional and safety analysis shows that Lunchly does not represent a genuinely healthier alternative to Lunchables. Both products are ultra-processed, high in sodium, and contain concerning levels of contaminants like lead. While Lunchly may swap some sugar for artificial sweeteners, this is not a significant health improvement and the influencers' marketing power can mislead consumers. For parents prioritizing nutrition and safety, the best choice remains making healthy, whole-food-based meals at home.

Frequently Asked Questions

The main difference is the branding and components. Lunchly is backed by social media influencers and includes a Prime Hydration drink and a Feastables chocolate bar, while Lunchables has a Capri Sun drink and other candy.

Yes, Lunchly was marketed as a "better-for-you" option, with its website and promotional content highlighting lower calorie and sugar counts compared to Lunchables.

No, experts agree neither is a truly healthy option for regular consumption. Both are ultra-processed and high in sodium, and Lunchly's use of artificial sweeteners is not necessarily an improvement.

Following its launch, numerous consumers reported finding mold in their Lunchly kits, and tests by Consumer Reports found detectable levels of lead and cadmium.

Lunchly's lower sugar content comes from using artificial sweeteners instead of sugar in its drink. The World Health Organization and other health experts caution against relying on artificial sweeteners for children.

Both products contain high sodium levels. One Lunchly kit can provide nearly half of a young child's daily sodium limit, a fact often omitted in its marketing comparisons.

Health experts recommend packing homemade lunches with fresh, whole foods. Examples include bento boxes with whole-grain crackers, real cheese, deli meat, fruits, and vegetables with dips.

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.