Skip to content

Is MK-7 Better Than MK-4? Unpacking the Vitamin K2 Debate

4 min read

A 2012 study published in Nutrition Journal found that nutritional doses of MK-7 were well-absorbed, whereas MK-4 was not detectable in the serum, highlighting a key difference in absorption. The question of whether MK-7 is better than MK-4 depends on understanding the unique properties of these two Vitamin K2 forms.

Quick Summary

This guide compares MK-4 and MK-7, detailing their sources, half-life, bioavailability, and recommended dosages. It clarifies why MK-7 is generally preferred for supplementation and long-term health benefits, especially for extrahepatic tissues.

Key Points

  • Bioavailability favors MK-7: At standard nutritional doses, MK-7 is well-absorbed and detected in the bloodstream, unlike MK-4 which shows poor absorption.

  • Half-life is longer for MK-7: MK-7 can stay in the bloodstream for up to 72 hours, providing a consistent effect, while MK-4 is rapidly eliminated within hours.

  • MK-7 provides a sustained systemic effect: Due to its longevity, MK-7 is better at consistently activating vitamin K-dependent proteins in extrahepatic tissues, including bone and arteries.

  • Nutritional MK-4 requires high dosage: To achieve a therapeutic effect similar to MK-7, MK-4 often requires significantly higher (milligram) dosages, as seen in some clinical studies, making standard microgram supplements less effective.

  • MK-7 is a better 'delivery system': The body converts absorbed MK-7 into MK-4 at the local tissue level, meaning MK-7 effectively supplies the biologically active MK-4 to where it's needed.

  • MK-7 is typically sourced from bacterial fermentation: Fermented foods like natto are rich in MK-7, whereas MK-4 is found in animal products.

In This Article

Vitamin K2 is not a single compound but a family of related molecules called menaquinones (MK-n). Among these, MK-4 and MK-7 are the most well-known forms, particularly in the supplement market, but they differ significantly. While both are critical for activating proteins involved in calcium metabolism and blood clotting, their absorption, half-life, and effective dosage levels vary drastically, which is central to the debate over which is superior.

The Fundamental Differences Between MK-4 and MK-7

The debate over whether MK-7 is better than MK-4 primarily centers on their distinct pharmacological profiles. MK-4, or menaquinone-4, has a very short half-life and is rapidly cleared from the body, typically within a few hours. In contrast, MK-7 has a significantly longer side chain, which allows it to remain in the bloodstream for up to 72 hours, meaning it can accumulate and provide a more consistent supply to extrahepatic tissues like bones and arteries.

Bioavailability and Absorption

  • MK-4: Studies show that MK-4 is poorly absorbed at the low microgram dosages typically used in nutritional supplements. To achieve a significant biological effect, pharmaceutical-level dosages (in milligrams) are often required, which are over 1,000 times higher than a standard MK-7 dose. At normal dietary levels, supplemental MK-4 is largely ineffective at raising serum vitamin K2 levels.
  • MK-7: This form is highly bioavailable and effectively absorbed at much lower, nutritional microgram dosages. Its long half-life allows it to build up in the bloodstream with consistent daily intake, ensuring a steady supply of vitamin K2 throughout the body. This makes it a far more efficient supplement choice for influencing long-term vitamin K status.

Sources and Production

  • MK-4 Sources: Found predominantly in animal products, including eggs, meat, and liver. However, the MK-4 content in many modern animal products is lower than historical levels due to modern farming practices. Supplemental MK-4 is often produced synthetically.
  • MK-7 Sources: Primarily derived from bacterial fermentation. The Japanese fermented soybean dish natto is an exceptionally rich food source of MK-7. In supplements, MK-7 is typically extracted from natto or derived from bacterial synthesis.

MK-4 vs. MK-7 Comparison Table

Feature MK-4 (Menaquinone-4) MK-7 (Menaquinone-7)
Half-Life Very short (hours) Long (up to 3 days)
Bioavailability Poor at nutritional doses High at nutritional doses
Effective Dose High, pharmaceutical-level (mg) Low, nutritional-level (µg)
Primary Sources Animal products (e.g., meat, eggs) Fermented foods (natto, some cheeses)
Systemic Effect Poor at supplemental doses, requires frequent intake Sustained and consistent systemic effect
Main Advantage It is the biologically active form used by tissues. High bioavailability and long duration of action.

The Role in Bone and Cardiovascular Health

Both forms of Vitamin K2 are involved in activating key proteins that regulate where calcium goes in the body. However, the efficiency with which they achieve this, especially outside the liver, is where MK-7 demonstrates a clear advantage.

  • Bone Health: Vitamin K2 activates osteocalcin, a protein that binds calcium to the bone matrix. A consistent supply of Vitamin K2 is crucial for bone mineralization. Given its long half-life and steady presence in the bloodstream, MK-7 provides continuous support for activating osteocalcin, whereas MK-4's short lifespan at nutritional doses makes it far less effective for this purpose.
  • Cardiovascular Health: Vitamin K2 activates Matrix Gla Protein (MGP), which helps prevent the calcification of arteries by directing calcium away from soft tissues. The superior bioavailability and prolonged circulation of MK-7 ensure that sufficient amounts reach arterial walls to effectively activate MGP, offering more robust cardiovascular protection compared to low-dose MK-4 supplementation.

Is MK-4 Useless, Then?

Not at all. The body efficiently converts other forms of vitamin K, including MK-7, into MK-4 at the local tissue level, particularly in extrahepatic tissues. Think of MK-7 as a highly effective delivery vehicle. It travels through the bloodstream and is then converted to the active MK-4 form where it's needed most. Therefore, supplementing with MK-7 can be a more efficient strategy to increase MK-4 availability throughout the body than taking nutritional doses of MK-4 directly.

The Verdict: Why MK-7 Edges Out MK-4

For the average consumer seeking a supplement for bone and heart health, MK-7 is the more logical and effective choice. Its superior bioavailability and prolonged half-life ensure a consistent and sustained elevation of vitamin K2 levels in the body, which is critical for activating vitamin K-dependent proteins in both bone and cardiovascular tissues. While MK-4 is the biologically active form at the tissue level, nutritional doses from supplements are poorly absorbed. By delivering a steady supply of MK-7, you are, in effect, providing your body with the raw material it needs to produce MK-4 where and when it's required, without the need for excessively high dosages or multiple daily pills. However, patients on blood thinners like warfarin must consult a doctor before starting any Vitamin K2 protocol.

How to Choose the Right Supplement

  • Read the label carefully: Look for a supplement that specifies "MK-7" and check the dosage, typically in micrograms (µg).
  • Consider combination products: Many supplements now combine MK-7 with Vitamin D3, as the two nutrients work synergistically for calcium regulation.
  • Prioritize long-term health: If your goal is to consistently support bone mineral density and cardiovascular health, MK-7 is the more reliable option.
  • Talk to a healthcare professional: This is especially important if you have pre-existing conditions or take other medications.

For a deeper dive into the science behind MK-7's efficiency, see the research published in PubMed Central on bioavailability: Comparison of menaquinone-4 and menaquinone-7 bioavailability in healthy women.

Frequently Asked Questions

MK-4 is the biologically active form used by the body's tissues. While nutritional doses of MK-4 have poor bioavailability, very high, pharmaceutical-grade doses (45 mg) have been used in some clinical settings, particularly in Japan, and have shown benefits.

MK-4 is less expensive to produce synthetically and is widely used. However, consumer awareness is growing regarding the superior absorption and long-term efficacy of MK-7 at nutritional dosages.

The label should specify the form of Vitamin K2. Look for "Menaquinone-7" or "MK-7" in the ingredients list. It may also list its source, such as being derived from natto or another fermented source.

Yes, it is possible but depends on dietary habits. The Japanese fermented soybean dish natto is one of the richest sources, containing high levels of MK-7. Some fermented cheeses also contain MK-7, but usually in smaller quantities.

Yes, some supplements offer a combination of both forms. Since MK-7 is efficiently converted to MK-4 in the body, a combined supplement may offer benefits, though MK-7 alone is often considered sufficient for most needs due to its superior absorption.

Vitamin D3 helps with calcium absorption in the gut. Vitamin K2, including MK-7 and MK-4, then directs this absorbed calcium to the bones and teeth, away from soft tissues like arteries. They are considered synergistic and are often supplemented together.

Both MK-4 and MK-7 are generally considered safe at recommended doses, with no established upper limit for Vitamin K. However, anyone taking blood-thinning medication should consult a doctor before starting a Vitamin K supplement.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.