Skip to content

Is Monk Fruit Safer Than Stevia? A Deep Dive into These Natural Sweeteners

4 min read

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), both monk fruit and highly purified steviol glycosides from the stevia plant are designated as 'Generally Recognized as Safe' (GRAS) for use as sweeteners. However, a closer look at the nuances of each reveals differences in potential side effects, taste, and processing that can influence which option is best for you.

Quick Summary

This article provides an in-depth comparison of monk fruit and stevia, examining their safety profiles, potential side effects, taste differences, and suitability for different dietary needs like diabetes. It also addresses the complexities of commercial products that often include other sweeteners or fillers.

Key Points

  • Both Are FDA-Approved: Both monk fruit (as mogroside extract) and stevia (as highly purified steviol glycosides) are considered 'Generally Recognized as Safe' (GRAS) by the FDA.

  • Taste Differs Significantly: Monk fruit provides a clean, fruity sweetness with less aftertaste, while stevia can leave a bitter or licorice-like flavor for some individuals.

  • Additives are a Key Concern: Most commercially available products are not pure. Many include bulking agents like erythritol, which can cause digestive issues or have other health implications.

  • Safety Depends on Individual Tolerance: For some, stevia's aftertaste or potential for allergic reaction (if sensitive to ragweed) may make monk fruit a safer choice. Others may not experience these issues.

  • Long-Term Research is Ongoing: While both are considered safe, long-term human studies on the effects of pure extracts, especially for monk fruit, are still limited.

  • Diabetic-Friendly with Caveats: Both are suitable for diabetics as pure extracts don't raise blood sugar. However, always check labels to avoid products with added sugars or fillers that can impact glucose levels.

In This Article

Monk Fruit vs. Stevia: Safety and Health Considerations

Both monk fruit and stevia are popular zero-calorie sugar alternatives derived from plants. Their safety is generally well-regarded, but understanding their differences in processing, potential side effects, and health impacts is crucial for choosing between them.

Monk Fruit: The 'Buddha Fruit' Sweetener

Originating from Southern China, monk fruit's sweetness comes from mogrosides, which are antioxidants and don't affect blood sugar levels. It's favored by those managing diabetes or on low-carb diets.

  • Processing: Mogrosides are extracted and purified from the crushed fruit.
  • Side Effects: Pure monk fruit extract is generally safe, with rare allergic reactions possible for those sensitive to gourds. High consumption might cause mild digestive issues, often linked to common additives like sugar alcohols.
  • Long-Term Research: While used in traditional Chinese medicine for centuries, extensive long-term studies on pure monk fruit extract in Western markets are limited.

Stevia: The Herbaceous Sweetener

Stevia, native to South America, gets its sweetness from steviol glycosides. The FDA considers highly purified stevia extracts (like Reb A) as GRAS.

  • Processing: Steviol glycosides are extracted and purified from the leaves. Crude extracts are not FDA-approved due to insufficient safety data.
  • Side Effects: Some users experience a bitter aftertaste. Digestive issues like bloating and nausea can occur, frequently due to added sugar alcohols. Allergies are possible for individuals sensitive to related plants such as ragweed.
  • Potential Risks: Some research suggests potential effects on the gut microbiome and endocrine system, though more human studies are needed. It may also interact with certain medications.

Potential Issues with Commercial Blends

Most monk fruit and stevia products contain additives. These often include:

  • Sugar Alcohols: Erythritol is a common bulking agent linked to potential cardiovascular risks and digestive upset at high doses.
  • Fillers: Dextrose and maltodextrin can raise blood sugar, counteracting the benefits of using a zero-calorie sweetener.

Comparison Table: Monk Fruit vs. Stevia

Feature Monk Fruit Stevia
Origin Southern China (Siraitia grosvenorii) South America (Stevia rebaudiana)
Sweetening Compound Mogrosides (antioxidants) Steviol glycosides
Aftertaste Generally clean, fruit-like, less bitter Can have a bitter, licorice-like taste
Known Allergies Very rare; cross-reactivity with gourd family Possible in those allergic to ragweed/daisies
Digestive Issues Mild effects possible at high doses, often from additives Bloating, gas, nausea possible, especially from added sugar alcohols
Regulatory Status (U.S.) GRAS (pure extract) GRAS (highly purified extract only)
Cost Often more expensive Widely available and affordable
Potential Benefits Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory properties Some studies suggest blood pressure/sugar control

Making Your Decision: Which is 'Safer'?

Determining the 'safer' option is often subjective and depends on individual factors. Key considerations include taste preferences, potential allergies, and sensitivity to common additives. Diabetics can benefit from both, but checking labels for added sugars or fillers is vital. Choosing pure extracts helps avoid issues associated with bulking agents like erythritol.

Conclusion

Both highly purified monk fruit and stevia extracts are safe natural sweeteners for most individuals. The choice between them often comes down to personal taste and sensitivity to additives. Monk fruit is often preferred for its cleaner taste and lacks the potential endocrine concerns sometimes associated with stevia in early studies. For the safest use, opt for pure extracts and consume in moderation. Consult a healthcare professional if you have health conditions or take medications.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is monk fruit better for baking than stevia? Monk fruit blends (often with erythritol) tend to mimic sugar's texture in baking better than stevia. However, both require recipes specifically adapted for them.

2. Why do commercial stevia and monk fruit products often contain other ingredients? Additives are used to bulk up the highly potent extracts, making them easier to measure and use in place of sugar, and to improve taste.

3. Is pure stevia leaf powder or crude extract safe? No. Only highly purified steviol glycoside extracts are considered GRAS by the FDA; crude extracts and whole leaves lack sufficient safety data.

4. Can monk fruit or stevia cause weight gain? As zero-calorie sweeteners, they don't directly cause weight gain. However, some research suggests they may not promote long-term weight loss and could potentially increase sweet cravings.

5. Can children or pregnant women use these sweeteners? Purified extracts are generally considered safe in moderation for these groups, but consulting a healthcare provider is recommended due to limited specific research.

6. Do either of these sweeteners impact blood sugar levels? Pure extracts do not significantly affect blood sugar or insulin, making them suitable for diabetics. Products with added sugar or fillers will impact glucose levels.

7. What is the biggest difference in potential safety risks? Potential safety concerns are mainly individual. Stevia is more linked to aftertaste, possible digestive issues from additives, and plant allergies. Pure monk fruit has no significant reported side effects.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, the FDA does not consider crude stevia extracts or whole stevia leaves as 'Generally Recognized as Safe' (GRAS) due to insufficient research on their potential health effects. Only highly purified steviol glycoside extracts are approved.

Highly purified stevia and monk fruit extracts are generally considered safe for children and pregnant/breastfeeding women when consumed in moderation. However, consulting a healthcare provider for personalized advice is always recommended due to limited research in these specific populations.

Pure monk fruit and highly purified stevia extracts have a negligible effect on blood sugar and insulin levels, making them safe for people with diabetes. However, many commercial products are blended with other ingredients like dextrose or sugar alcohols that can affect blood glucose.

The most notable difference is related to individual tolerance. Stevia is more commonly associated with a bitter aftertaste and potential gastrointestinal issues from additives, as well as a risk for those with specific plant allergies. Pure monk fruit extract has no significant reported side effects.

Monk fruit is generally preferred by those sensitive to aftertastes, as it provides a cleaner, fruit-like sweetness. Stevia often has a persistent bitter or licorice-like aftertaste for many users.

Additives are included because pure stevia and monk fruit extracts are extremely concentrated. Bulking agents like erythritol or dextrose are used to provide volume, making them easier to measure and use in recipes, and to improve taste.

Yes, monk fruit gets its sweetness from mogrosides, which are potent antioxidants. This provides an anti-inflammatory property not found in stevia.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.