Skip to content

Is There Sugar in Ricola? Understanding Their Product Line

3 min read

Since 1930, Ricola has been crafting herbal sweets using a special blend of Swiss alpine herbs, but many consumers wonder about the use of sweeteners. The answer to "is there sugar in Ricola?" is that it depends on the specific product, as the company offers both traditional sugar-based lozenges and a wide selection of sugar-free varieties. This means careful label reading is essential for those monitoring their sugar intake.

Quick Summary

This article explores Ricola's product offerings, explaining the difference between their sugar and sugar-free lozenges. It details the ingredients and sweeteners used in each type and clarifies the implications for individuals managing their sugar consumption or allergies.

Key Points

  • Both Options Available: Ricola produces both traditional sugar-sweetened lozenges and sugar-free alternatives.

  • Sugar-Free Sweeteners: Sugar-free varieties use sweeteners like isomalt, stevia extracts, and sometimes artificial options like sucralose or acesulfame-K.

  • Read the Label: The packaging will clearly indicate if a product is sugar-free or contains sugar; checking the ingredients list is the most accurate method.

  • Distinct Packaging: Sugar-free Ricola lozenges often come in an oval shape, while the original, sugar-based drops are traditionally cube-shaped.

  • Diabetic Consideration: Individuals with diabetes should choose sugar-free options and consult a doctor, as the traditional products contain significant sugar.

In This Article

Ricola's Dual Product Strategy: Sugar vs. Sugar-Free

For nearly a century, Ricola has maintained a dual approach to its product formulation, providing both classic, sugar-sweetened herbal drops and modern, sugar-free alternatives. The original Ricola recipe, developed in the 1930s, includes sugar and starch syrup, while a later innovation introduced a range of products using different sugar substitutes. This variety allows consumers to choose based on their dietary needs and preferences.

The Sugar-Free Lineup and Sweetener Alternatives

Ricola's sugar-free products rely on a combination of sweeteners to replicate the taste and texture of their original formula without the calories or dental impact of sugar. The main sweeteners used include:

  • Isomalt: A sugar alcohol (polyol) that provides bulk and mild sweetness.
  • Steviol Glycosides: Extracts from the stevia plant, which are natural and calorie-free.
  • Artificial Sweeteners: Some products, depending on the region, may also use sucralose, acesulfame-K, or aspartame.

This careful formulation ensures that the soothing effects of Ricola's 13-herb blend can be enjoyed without sugar. For instance, Ricola's Original Herb Cough Drops in the sugar-free version are made using these substitutes, making them a suitable choice for many.

The Original Sugar Formula

In contrast, Ricola's traditional or 'original' lozenges, such as the cube-shaped Original Herb Cough Drops, contain sugar and starch syrup as their primary inactive ingredients. While still relying on the same blend of Swiss herbs, these products offer a classic taste profile sweetened with traditional ingredients. The nutritional information for these lozenges reflects a notable sugar content, with the Cherry flavor, for example, listing 72g of sugars per 100g.

Comparison Table: Sugar vs. Sugar-Free Ricola

Feature Sugar-Free Ricola Lozenges Traditional (Sugar) Ricola Lozenges
Sweeteners Used Isomalt, Steviol Glycosides, and potentially Aspartame/Sucralose Sugar, Starch Syrup
Sugar Content 0g of sugar per lozenge Approximately 3g of sugar per lozenge
Calories Significantly lower calorie count due to sweeteners Higher calorie count from sugar
Dental Health 'Tooth-friendly,' as they do not promote tooth decay Can contribute to tooth decay if consumed frequently
Appearance Often oval-shaped to distinguish from the original Traditionally cube-shaped
Diabetic Suitability Consult a doctor; relies on artificial or alternative sweeteners Not recommended for individuals with diabetes
Taste Profile Pleasingly sweet, designed to mimic the original Classic, traditionally sweet taste

Understanding the Label: How to Tell the Difference

When purchasing Ricola, the most reliable way to determine the sugar content is to read the packaging carefully. Manufacturers are required to list all ingredients, including sweeteners, in descending order of predominance. The sugar-free versions are clearly labeled as such and typically use phrases like 'sugar-free,' 'no sugar added,' or 'sweetened with stevia'. The packaging for sugar-free variants is also often oval, differentiating them from the traditional cube-shaped sugar lozenges.

The Growing Popularity of Sugar Alternatives

As consumer awareness of sugar intake has grown, so has the demand for sugar-free products. Ricola has adapted to this shift by replacing some artificial sweeteners, like aspartame, with more naturally sourced alternatives such as steviol glycosides in certain markets. This reflects a broader industry trend towards cleaner labels and more natural ingredient sourcing, which aligns with Ricola's long-standing heritage of using Swiss-grown herbs. The company's recent B Corp certification also highlights its commitment to sustainable practices, including the cultivation of sugar beets with sustainable methods for its sugar-sweetened products.

Conclusion

In summary, the presence of sugar in Ricola depends entirely on the specific product. While the traditional lozenges contain sugar, the company offers a robust lineup of clearly-labeled, sugar-free alternatives that use sweeteners like isomalt and stevia. Consumers should always check the package to ensure they are selecting the version that aligns with their dietary needs, especially if managing conditions like diabetes. The brand's history shows a clear evolution, adapting to consumer demand for lower-calorie and sugar-free options while staying true to its herbal roots.

What are the 13 Ricola herbs? An Overview

Ricola's signature blend consists of 13 herbs, including: elder, horehound, hyssop, lemon balm, linden flowers, mallow, peppermint, sage, thyme, wild thyme, burnet, speedwell, and marshmallow. The specific parts of the plants used and their combination remain a carefully guarded secret.

For more information on Ricola products and their ingredients, visit the official Ricola website.

Frequently Asked Questions

Not all Ricola products are sugar-free. Ricola offers both traditional lozenges sweetened with sugar and a wide range of products clearly labeled as 'sugar-free' that use sweeteners like stevia and isomalt.

Ricola's sugar-free products are sweetened using a combination of isomalt (a sugar alcohol), steviol glycosides from the stevia plant, and sometimes other artificial sweeteners such as sucralose or acesulfame-K, depending on the specific product and region.

Ricola offers 'no sugar added' lozenges that are suitable for diabetics, but it's important to choose the sugar-free varieties and consult a doctor before use. The traditional, sugar-sweetened versions are not recommended for those managing diabetes.

The easiest way to tell is by reading the product packaging. Look for 'sugar-free' labeling on the front. Additionally, you can check the ingredients list for 'sugar' or 'starch syrup' or look for the word 'polyols' on sugar-free products.

No, not every single flavor has a sugar-free equivalent. While many popular flavors are available in both forms, some may only be produced with the traditional sugar recipe.

Isomalt is a sugar alcohol (polyol) used as a sugar substitute in many sugar-free products, including some Ricola lozenges. It is considered safe for consumption, though excessive intake may have a laxative effect.

The original, cube-shaped Ricola Original Herb lozenges are sweetened with sugar and starch syrup. However, a sugar-free version of the original herb blend is also available, often in an oval shape.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.